Abstract
Learning and, more generally, the development of cognitive processes in children has been thought to depend on the nature of the conflict induced by confrontation with others (i.e., socio-cognitive conflict). The aim of this article is to extend this notion to social-influence situations involving adolescents and young adults through the presentation of a model that explains social influence in aptitude tasks. This model takes into account the differences or similarities of the competencies of the source and target. It conceptualizes the social versus epistemic regulations of conflict in terms of an identity threat that can be induced by social comparison. To illustrate parts of the model, several experiments are briefly summarized. One demonstrates the conflict regulation dynamics involved in the similarities or differences of the sources' and targets' competencies, while the others show how social-influence dynamics are modified by the presence or absence of a threat to self-competence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abric, Jean-Claude (1994). Les représentations sociales: Aspects théoriques. In Abric, J.C. (Ed.), Pratiques sociales et représentations. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; pp. 11–35.
Allen, Vernon L (1965). Situational factors in conformity. In Berkowitz L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press; pp. 133–175.
Asch, Solomon E (1956). Studies on independence and conformity: A minority of one against aunanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70, 416.
Baldwin, James M (1913). History of psychology. London: Watts.
Brown, Jonathan D (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgement. Social Cognition, 4, 353–376.
Butera, Fabrizio, Gardair, Emmanuelle, Maggi, Jenny, & Mugny, Gabriel (1998). Les paradoxes de l'expertise: influence sociale et (in)compétence de soi et d'autrui. In Py, J., Somat, A., & Baillé, J. (Eds.), Psychologie sociale et formation professionnelle: propositions et regards critiques. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes; pp. 111–123.
Butera, Fabrizio, Huguet, Pascal, Mugny, Gabriel, & Pérez, Juan-Antonio (1994). Socioepistemic conflict and constructivism. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 53, 229–239.
Butera, Fabrizio & Mugny, Gabriel (1992). Influence minoritaire et falsification. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 5(2), 115–132.
Butera, Fabrizio & Mugny, Gabriel (1995). Conflict between incompetencies and influence of a low-expertise source in hypothesis testing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 457–462.
Butera, Fabrizio, Mugny, Gabriel, Legrenzi, Paulo, & Pérez, Juan-Antonio (1996). Majority and minority influence, task representation and inductive reasoning. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123–136.
Butera, Fabrizio, Mugny, Gabriel, & Tomei, Alexander (2000). Incertitudes et enjeux identitaires dans l'influence sociale. In Beauvois, J.L., Joule, R.V., & Monteil, J.M. (Eds.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales (Vol. 7). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes; pp. 205–229.
Clark, Russell D. & Maass, Anne (1990). The effects of majority size on minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(2), 99–117.
Collins, Rebecca L (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on selfevaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 1, 51–69.
Deutsch, Morton & Gerard, Harold B (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.
De Vries, Nanne K., De Dreu, Carsten K.W., Gordijn, Ernestine, & Schuurman, Mieke (1996). Majority and minority influence: A dual role interpretation. In Stroebe, W. & Hewstone, M. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 7). Chichester: Wiley & Sons pp. 145–172.
Doise, Willem & Mugny, Gabriel (1979). Individual and collective conflicts of centration in cognitive development. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 105–108.
Doise, Willem & Mugny, Gabriel (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Doise, Willem, Mugny, Gabriel, & Pérez, Juan-Antonio (1998). The social construction of knowledge: Socialmarking and sociocognitive conflict. In Flick, U. (Ed.), The psychology of the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; pp. 77–99.
Doise, Willem & Palmorani, Augusto (1984). Social interaction in individual development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, Schmuel & Kruglanski, Arie (1992). Self as an epistemic authority: Effects of experiential and instructional learning. Social Cognition, 10, 357–375.
Evans, Jonathan St. B.T. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Hove: UK: Erlbaum.
Falomir, Juan-Manuel, Mugny, Gabriel, Sanchez-Mazas, Margarita, Pérez, Juan-Antonio, & Carrasco, Feliciano (1998). Influence et conflit d'identité: de la conformité à l'intériorisation. In Beauvois, J.L., Joule, R.V. & Monteil J.M. (Eds.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites socials (Vol. 6), Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé pp. 313–336.
Festinger, Leon (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
Flament, Claude (1982). Du biais d'équilibre à la représentation du groupe. In Codol, J.P & Leyens, J.P (Eds.), Cognitive analysis of social behavior. La Haye, Boston, Londres: Martinus Nijhoff; pp. 151–169.
French, John R. & Raven, Bertram H. (1959). The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies in social power.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 118–149.
Goethals, George R. & Darley, John M. (1977). Social comparison theory: An attributional approach. In Suls, J. & Miller, R. (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Washington, DC: Hemisphere, pp. 259–278.
Gorman, Michael & Carlson, Bernard (1989). Can experiments be used to study science? Social Epistemology, 3, 89–106.
Hass, R. Glen (1981). Effects of source characteristics on cognitive responses and persuasion. In Petty, R.E., Ostrom, T.M. & Brock, T.C. (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; pp. 141–172.
Hovland, Carl I., Janis, Irving L., & Kelley, Harold H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Insko, Chester A., Drenan, Sarah, Solomon, Michael R., Smith, Richard, & Wade, Terry J. (1983). Conformity as a function of consistency of positive self-evaluation with being liked and being right. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 342–358.
Johnson, David W. & Johnson, Frank P. (1991). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kruglanski, Arie W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York, London: Plenum Press.
Kruglanski, Arie W. & Mayseless, Ofra (1987). Motivational effects in the social comparison of opinions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 834–842.
Legrenzi, Paolo, Butera, Fabrizio, Mugny, Gabriel, & Pérez, Juan-Antonio (1991). Majority and minority influence in inductive reasoning: A preliminary study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 359–363.
Levine, John M., Resnick, Lauren B., & Higgins, E. Tory (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585–612.
Maggi, Jenny, Butera, Fabrizio, & Mugny, Gabriel (1996). Conflict of incompetencies: Direct and indirect influences on representation of the centimeter. International Review of Social Psychology, 9, 91–105.
Mead, George H (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moliner, Pascal (1989). Validation expérimentale de l'hypothèse du noyau central des representations socials. Bulletin de Psychologie, 42, 759–762.
Moliner, Pascal & Tafani, Eric (1997). Attitudes and social représentations: A theoretical and experimental approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 687–702.
Monteil, Jean-Marc & Huguet, Pascal (1999). Social context and cognitive performance: Towards a social psychology of cognition. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Moscovici, Serge (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behaviour. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13). New York: Academic Press; pp. 209–239.
Moscovici, Serge, Lage, Elisabeth, & Naffrechoux, Martine (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32, 365–380.
Moscovici, Serge, Mucchi Faina, Angelica, & Maass, Anne (1994). Social influence. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Moscovici, Serge, Mugny, Gabriel, & Van Avermaet, Eddy (1985). Perspectives on minority influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
Mugny, Gabriel, Butera, Fabrizio, Quiamzade, Alain, Dragulescu, Agatta, & Tomei, Alexander (in press). Comparaison sociale des compétences et influence sociale. In Brangier, E., Dubois, N., & Tarquinio, C. (Eds.), L'analyse psychosociale des compétences.
Mugny, Gabriel, Butera, Fabrizio, Sanchez-Mazas, Margarita, & Pérez, Juan-Antonio (1995). Judgments in conflict: The conflict elaboration theory of social influence. In Boothe, B., Hirsig, R., Helminger, A., Meier, B., & Volkart, R. (Eds.), Perception, evaluation, interpretation. Berne: Huber, pp. 160–168.
Mugny, Gabriel, De Paolis, Paola, & Carugati, Felice (1984). Social regulation in cognitive development. In Doise, W. & Palmonari, A. (Eds.), Social interaction in individual development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; pp. 127–146.
Mugny, Gabriel & Doise, Willem (1978). Socio-cognitive conflict and structuration of individual and collective performances. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 181–192.
Mugny, Gabriel, Doise, Willem, & Perret-Clermont, Anne-Nelly (1975-1976). Conflit de centrations et progrès cognitive. Bulletin de Psychologie, XXIX(321), 4–7.
Mugny, Gabriel, Lévy, May, & Doise, Willem (1978). Conflit sociocognitif et développement cognitif: l'effet de la présentation par un adulte de modèles ‘progressifs’ et de modèles ‘régressifs,’ dans une épreuve de représentation spatiale. Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 19, 1–30.
Mugny, Gabriel, Moliner, Pascal, & Flament, Claude (1997). De la pertinence des processus d'influence sociale dans la dynamique des représentations socials. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 10, 31–49.
Mugny, Gabriel, Tafani, Eric, Butera, Fabrizio, & Pigière, Dominique (1998). Contrainte et dépendance informationnelles: Influence sociale sur la représentation du groupe d'amis ideal. Connexions, 72, 55–72.
Mugny, Gabriel, Tafani, Eric, Falomir, Juan-Manuel, & Layat, Carine (2000). Crédibilité de la source, comparaison sociale et influence sociale. International Review of Social Psychology, 13, 151–175.
Nemeth, Charlan J (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23–32.
Nemeth, Charlan J., Mosier, Kathleen, & Chiles, Cynthia (1992). When convergent thought improves performance: Majority versus minority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 139–144.
Nemeth, Charlan J. & Wachtler, Joel (1983). Creative problem solving as a result of majority versus minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 45–55.
Pérez, Juan-Antonio & Mugny, Gabriel (1987). Paradoxical effects of categorization in minority influence: When being an outgroup is an advantage. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 157–169.
Pérez, Juan-Antonio & Mugny, Gabriel (1996). The conflict elaboration theory of social influence. In Witte, E.H. & Davis, J.H. (Eds.), Understanding group behavior, (Vol. 2). Small group processes and interpersonal relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; pp. 191–210.
Perret-Clermont, Anne-Nelly (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children. London: Academic Press.
Piaget, Jean (1965). Etudes sociologiques. Genève: Librairie Droz.
Piaget, Jean & Inhelder, Bärbel (1948). La représentation de l'espace chez l'enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Popper, Karl R (1955). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper & Row.
Quiamzade, Alain, Falomir, Juan-Manuel, Mugny, Gabriel, & Butera, Fabrizio (1999). Gestion identitaire versus épistémique des competences. In Hansen, H., Sigrist, B., Goorhuis, H. & Landolt, H. (Eds.), Bildung und Arbeit: Das Ende einer Differenz? Aarau, Sauerländer; pp. 267–276.
Quiamzade, Alain, Tomei, Alexander, & Butera, Fabrizio (2000). Informational dependence and informational constraint: Social comparison and social influences in anagram resolution task. International Review of Social Psychology, 13, 123–150.
Tafani, Eric, Mugny, Gabriel, & Bellon, Sébastien (1999). Irréversibilité du changement et enjeux identitaires dans l'influence sociale sur une représentation sociale. Psychologie et société, 1, 73–104.
Vygotsky, Lev S (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wason, Peter C (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129–140.
Wheeler, Ladd, Martin, René, & Suls, Jerry (1997). The proxy model of social comparison for selfassessment of ability. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 54–61.
Wicklund, Robert A. (1989). The appropriation of ideas. In Paulus, P.B. (Ed.), Psychology of group influence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; pp. 393–423.
Wicklund, Robert A. & Brehm, Jack W (1968). Attitude change as a function of felt competence and threat to attitudinal freedom. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 64–75.
Wills, Thomas A (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245–271.
Winnykamen, Fayda (1990). Apprendre en imitant? Paris: Presses Universitaires de France
Wood, Joanne V. & Taylor Kathryn L (1991). Serving self-relevant goals through social comparison. In Suls, J. & Wills, T.A. (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; pp. 23–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quiamzade, A., Mugny, G. Social Influence Dynamics in Aptitude Tasks. Social Psychology of Education 4, 311–334 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011388821962
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011388821962