Skip to main content
Log in

Developing Intrinsically Motivated Information Systems—A Critical Systems Approach

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the problematic of development methodologies for organisational information systems and especially with their application to business systems. Historically, information systems development methodologies tend to fail, because either they take the organisational purposefulness for granted, or they do not analyse it thoroughly. This paper's position is that the analysis, and the definition or redefinition of the systemic purpose are regarded as the utmost expression of the system's purposefulness. This is to be achieved by ensuring the participation of all the stakeholders who affect, or are affected by, a particular business system's operations. The nature of participation, defined as a process of the stakeholders' perceptual exchanges, is deemed to be problematic in itself, due to the influence exerted upon it by organisational power, coercion and false consciousness. The paper highlights the philosophical reasons for the failures of information systems development methodologies, and provides a conceptual solution to this problematic as well as a strategy for the development of intrinsically motivated organisational information systems. The intrinsically motivated information systems methodology outlined here (BSPA) is intended to yield organisational information systems that demonstrably improve co-ordination of organisational activities, by enabling the development and maintenance of a single/multifaceted view of purpose throughout organisations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apel K-O. Toward a Transformation of Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auramäki E, Lehtinen E, Lyytinen K. A speech-act-based office modeling approach. ACM TOIS 1988;6(2):126–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin T. Language Crafted: A Linguistic Theory of Poetic Syntax. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S. The Heart of Enterprise. Chichester: Wiley, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell A, Tawadey K. Mission & Business Philosophy. London: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland PB. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: Wiley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida J. Dissemination. Translated by B. Johnson. London: Athlone Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker PF. Post-Capitalist Society. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood R. Six scenarios for the future of systems 'problem solving'. Systems Practice 1989;2:75–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood R. Liberating Systems Theory. New York: Plenum, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood R. Beyond TQM. Chichester: Wiley, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood R. Solving Problem Solving: A Potent Force For Effective Management. Chichester: Wiley, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood R. Rethinking the Fifth Discipline: Learning within the Unknowable. London: Routledge, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood R, Carson E. Dealing with Complexity: An Introduction to the Theory and Application of Systems Science. New York: Plenum, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood R, Jackson MC. Creative Problem Solving—Total Systems Intervention. Chichester: Wiley, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood R, Romm N. Diversity Management: Triple Loop Learning. Chichester: Wiley, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M. The Archaeology of Knowledge. (Trans. Sheridan Smith, A M). London: Tavistock, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith JR. Strategy and organisation planning. Human Resource Management. 1983;22:63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guller J. Communicative competence and normative force. NewGerman Critique 1985;35(Spring/Summer):135–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J. The Theory of Communicative Action—Reason and the Rationalisation of Society, Volume 1. London: Polity Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J. Communication and the Evolution of Society. London: Polity, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J. The Theory of Communicative Action—The Critique of the Functionalist Reason, Volume 2. London: Polity, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J. Knowledge & Human Interests. London: Polity, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth A. Critique of Power: Stages of Reflection of a Critical Theory of Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer M. Critical Theory: Selected Essays. Translated by M.J. O'Connel et al., New York: Herder and Herder, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M. Social systems theory and practice: The need for a critical approach. International Journal of General Systems 1985;(10):135–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M. Future prospects in systems thinking. In: Flood R, Jackson M and Keys P. ed. Human Relations: The Next Ten Years in Systems Research. New York: Plenum, 1989:73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M. Beyond a system of systems methodologies. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1990;41:657–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M. Systems Methodology for the Management Sciences. London: Wiley, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M, Keys P. Towards a system of systems methodologies. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1984;35:473–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys P. A methodology for methodology choice. Systems Research 1988;5:65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosko B. Fuzzy Thinking. Flamingo, 1994.

  • Kling, R. What is social informatics and why does it matter? D-Lib Magazine 1999;5(1):1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling R, Star L. Human centred systems in the perspective of organisational and social informatics. Computers and Society 1998;28(1):22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen E, Lyytinen K. Action based model of information system. Information Systems 1986;11(4):299–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin K. Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. Cartwright D, ed. London: Tavistock, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunn E. Marxism and Modernism: An Historical Study of Lukacs, Brecht, Benjamin and Adorno. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard F. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen K. Implications of theories of language for information systems. MIS Quarterly 1985;9(1):61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers JC. Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking: critical theory and soft systems methodology. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 1980;7:41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers JC. Self-Producing Systems—Implications and Applications of Autopoiesis. New York: Plenum, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers JC. Multi-paradigm Multimethodology. In: Mingers J and Gill A, ed. Multimethodology—The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies. London: Wiley, 1997:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H. Power In and Around Organisations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliga J. Power and Interest in Organizations: A Contingent, Relational View. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the International Society for Systems Science, Edinburgh, July 2–7, 1989.

  • Oliga J. Power, Ideology and Control. New York: Plenum, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagiotidis P. Business Systems Purpose, Analysis. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Birmingham: Aston University, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W. Critical Heuristics of Social Planning. Bern and Stuttgart: Verlag Paul Haupt, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman R, Peters T, Philips J. The 7-S Framework. New York: Business Horizons, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M. The Theory of Social and Economic Organisation. Trans. A.M. Henderson and T Parsons. New York: Free Press, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellmer A. The Persistence of Modernity: Essays on Aesthetics, Ethics, and Postmodernism. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann R. Emancipation and rationality: Foundational problems in the theories of Marx and Habermas. Ratio 1984; 26(2):143–165.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John S. Edwards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Panagiotidis, P., Edwards, J.S. Developing Intrinsically Motivated Information Systems—A Critical Systems Approach. Information Systems Frontiers 3, 211–226 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011400409028

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011400409028

Navigation