Skip to main content
Log in

Neither good, nor bad, but dangerous: Surveillance as an ethical paradox

  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We argue for a discursive ethic of surveillance that accounts for the paradoxes that the phenomenon presents to today’s organisational members. We first we develop a genealogy of privacy and illustrate its relation to surveillance, focusing on the antinomian relationship between the “public” and “private.” Then we review the common ethical tensions that arise in today’s technologically intensive workplace. Lastly, we develop a critical approach to the ethical status of privacy and surveillance — a “micro-ethics” — that remains open to discursivelybased negotiation by those who find themselves at the very point of scrutiny.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Robert John Ackermann. Nietzsche: A Frenzied Look. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean-Marie Apostolidès. Le roi machine: Spectacle et politique au temps. Paris: Editions Gallimard, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jon Bannister, Nicholas R. Fyfe and Ade Kearns. Closed Circuit Television and the City. In Clive Norris, Jade Moran and Gary Armstrong, editors, Surveillance, Closed Circuit Television, and Social Control. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • James Barker and Graham Sewell. 'Here' Looking at You': Surveillance as a Trope for Organizational Domination. Department of Management Working Paper 2000/ 17, University of Melbourne, Australia, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • James R. Barker. The Discipline of Teamwork. Newbury Park CA: Sage, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • James R. Barker and George Cheney. The Concept and the Practices of Discipline in Contemporary Organizational Life. Communication Monographs, 61: 19–43, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley I. Benn and Gerald Gaus. The Private and the Public in Social Policy. London: Croom Helm, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeremy Bentham. The Panopticon Writings. London: Verso, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • William Bogard. The Simulation of Surveillance: Hypercontrol in Telematic Societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy Boyne. Post-Panopticism. Economy and Society, 29: 285–307, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harry Braverman. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • David Brin. The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us to Choose between Privacy and Freedom? Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Deigh. Ethics. In Robert Audi, editor, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Deigh. The Sources of Moral Agency: Essays in Moral Psychology and Freudian Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilles Deleuze. Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy Dubord. La société du spectacle. Paris: Buchet-Chastel, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norbert Elias. The Civilizing Process: The Development of Manners, Vol. I. New York: Urizen Books, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • David Flaherty. Privacy in Colonial New England. Charlottesville VA: University of Virginia Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Fleming and Graham Sewell. Looking for The Good Soldier, Švejk: Alternative Modalities of Resistance in the Contemporary Workplace. Department of Management Working Paper 2000/ 18, University of Melbourne, Australia, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel Foucault. Space, Knowledge, and Power. In Paul Rabinow, editor, The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1984a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel Foucault. On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of Work in Process. In Paul Rabinow, editor, The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1984b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel Foucault. The Ethic of Care for the Self as a Practice of Freedom. In James Bernauer and David Rasmussen, editors, The Final Foucault. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel Foucault. What is called ‘Punishing’? In James D. Faubion, editor, Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984: Volume 3 (Power). New York: New Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colin Gordon. Introduction. In James D. Faubion, editor, EssentialWorks of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984: Volume 3 (Power). New York: New Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ian Hacking. Making up People. In Thomas C. Heller, Morton Sosna and David E. Wellbery, editors, Reconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality and the Self in Western Thought. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin Heidegger. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. New York: Harper Row, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertrude, Himmelfarb. The Haunted House of Jeremy Bentham. In Richard Herr and Harold T. Parker, editors, Ideas in History. Durham NC: Duke University Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith W. Hoskins and Richard H. Macve. Accounting as Discipline: The Overlooked Supplement. In Ellen Messer-Davidow, David R. Shumway and David J. Sylvan, editors, Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luca D. Introna and Athanasia Pouloudi. Privacy in the Information Age: Stakeholders, Interests, and Values. Journal of Business Ethics, 22: 27–38, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin Jay. Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.L. Johnson. Privacy and the Judgement of Others. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 23: 259–275, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • David S. Landes. What Do Bosses Really Do? Journal of Economic History, XLVI: 585–623, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oren M. Levin-Waldman. Reconceiving Liberalism: Dilemmas of Contemporary Liberal Public Policy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • David Lyon. The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen A. Marglin. What Do Bosses Do? The Origins and Functions of Hierarchy in Capitalist Production. In Victor D. Lippit, editors, Radical Political Economy: Explorations in Alternative Economic Analysis. Armok NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1994 [1974].

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques-Alain Miller. Jeremy Bentham' Panoptic Device. October, 41 ( Summer): 3–29, 1987 [1973].

  • Stephen Paul Miller. The Seventies Now: Culture as Surveillance. Durham NC: Duke University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance Packard. The Naked Society. Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mary Poovey. The History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Roy Porter. Enlightenment: Britain and the Making of the Modern World. London: Allen Lane, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tom Rockmore. Heidegger on Technology and Democracy. In Andrew Feenberg and Alastair Hannay, editors, The Politics of Knowledge. Bloomington IN: University of Indiana Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • James Rule. Private Lives and Public Surveillance. London: Allen & Lane, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham Sewell. Be Seeing You: A Rejoinder to Webster and Robins and to Jenkins. Sociology, 30: 785–797, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham Sewell. Plenary Address. International Workshop on Lean Production, Rende, Italy, March, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alan Sheridan. Michel Foucault: The Will to Truth. London: Tavistock Books, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdinand Shoeman. Privacy: Philosophical Dimensions of the Literature. In Ferdinand Shoeman, editor, Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • William G. Staples. The Culture of Surveillance: Discipline and social control in the United States. New York: St. Martin' Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandeis. The Right to Privacy [the Implicit Made Explicit. In Ferdinand Shoeman, editors, Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Reginald Whitaker. The End of Privacy? How Total Surveillance is Becoming a Reality. New York: New Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steve Woolgar. Science and Technology Studies and the Renewal of Social Theory. In Stephen P. Turner, editor, Social Theory and Sociology: The Classics and Beyond. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sewell, G., Barker, J.R. Neither good, nor bad, but dangerous: Surveillance as an ethical paradox. Ethics and Information Technology 3, 181–194 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012231730405

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012231730405

Keywords

Navigation