Skip to main content
Log in

Gustatory Responsiveness to Polycose in Four Species of Nonhuman Primates

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The taste responsiveness of six squirrel monkeys, five pigtail macaques, four olive baboons, and four spider monkeys to polycose, a starch-derived polysaccharide, was assessed in two-bottle preference tests of brief duration (2 min). In experiment 1, the monkeys were given the choice between tap water and defined concentrations of polycose dissolved in tap water. In experiment 2, the animals were given the choice between polycose and sucrose, fructose, glucose, lactose, and maltose presented in equimolar concentrations of 100 and 200 mM, respectively. The animals were found to prefer concentrations of polycose as low as 10 mM (pigtail macaques), 30 mM (olive baboons and spider monkeys), and 60 mM (squirrel monkeys) over tap water. Relative taste preferences were stable across the concentrations tested and indicate an order of relative effectiveness (sucrose > polycose ≥ maltose) in squirrel monkeys, spider monkeys, and olive baboons that is similar to the order of relative sweetness in humans. Pigtail macaques, however, displayed an order of relative effectiveness (maltose > polycose ≥ sucrose) that differs markedly from that found in the other primate species tested and is similar to relative taste preferences found in rodents such as rats. Both the high sensitivity of the pigtail macaques to polycose and their vivid predilection for this polysaccharide and its disaccharide constituent maltose suggest that Macaca nemestrina, unlike other primates, but like rodents, may have specialized taste receptors for starch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • ASTM, 1973. Compilation of odor and taste threshold values data. Data Series DS 48. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

  • BEAUCHAMP, G. K., MALLER, O., and ROGERS, J. G. 1977. Flavor preferences in cats (Felis catus and Panthera sp.). J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 91:1118-1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • CALDECOTT, J. O. 1986. An Ecological and Behavioural Study of the Pig-Tailed Macaque. Contributions to Primatology, Vol. 21. Karger, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHAPMAN, C. A. 1987. Flexibility in the diets of three species of Costa Rican primates. Folia Primatol. 49:90-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLUTTON-BROCK, T. H. and HARVEY, P. H. 1977. Species differences in feeding and ranging behaviour in primates, pp. 557-584, in T. H. Clutton-Brock (ed.). Primate Ecology. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEIGIN, M. B., SCLAFANI, A., and SUNDAY, S. R. 1987. Species differences in polysaccharide and sugar taste preferences. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 11:231-240.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FORMAKER, B. K., Kearns, C. E., and FRANK, M. E. 1998. The taste of polycose in hamsters. Chem. Senses 23:675-682.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GIZA, B. K., SCOTT, T. R., SCLAFANI, A., and ANTONUCCI, R. F. 1991. Polysaccharides as taste stimuli: Their effect in the nucleus tractus solitarius of the rat. Brain Res. 555:1-9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GLASER, D. 1993. The effects of sweeteners in primates, pp. 353-363, in M. Mathlouti, J. A. Kanters, and G. G. Birch (eds.). Sweet-Taste Chemoreception. Elsevier, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLASER, D. 1986. Geschmacksforschung bei Primaten. Vjschr. Naturforsch. Ges. Zurich 131:92-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • HETTINGER, T. P., FRANK, M. E., and MYERS, W. E. 1996. Are the tastes of polycose and monosodium glutamate unique? Chem. Senses 21:341-347.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HIZUKURI, S. 1996. Starch: Analytical aspects, pp. 347-429, in A. C. Eliasson (ed.). Carbohydrates in Food. Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • KARE, M. 1971. Comparative study of taste, pp. 278-292, in L. M. Beidler (ed.). Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. IV, Part 2. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • LASKA, M. 1994. Taste difference thresholds for sucrose in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). Folia Primatol. 63:144-148.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LASKA, M. 1996. Taste preference thresholds for food-associated sugars in the squirrel monkey, Saimiri sciureus. Primates 37:93-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • LASKA, M. 1997. Taste preferences for five food-associated sugars in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). J. Chem. Ecol. 23:659-672.

    Google Scholar 

  • LASKA, M. 1999. Taste responsiveness to food-associated acids in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). J. Chem. Ecol. 25:1623-1632.

    Google Scholar 

  • LASKA, M. 2000. Gustatory responsiveness to food-associated sugars and acids in pigtail macaques Macaca nemestrina. Physiol. Behav. 70:495-504.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laska, M., CARRERA SANCHEZ, E., RODRIGUEZ RIVERA, J. A., and RODRIGUEZ LUNA, E. 1996. Gustatory thresholds for food-associated sugars in the spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi). Am. J. Primatol. 39:189-193.

    Google Scholar 

  • LASKA, M., CARRERA SANCHEZ, E., and RODRIGUEZ LUNA, E. 1998. Relative taste preferences for food-associated sugars in the spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi). Primates 39:91-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • LASKA, M., SCHEUBER, H.-P., CARRERA SANCHEZ, E., and RODRIGUEZ LUNA, E. 1999a. Taste difference thresholds for sucrose in two species of nonhuman primates. Am. J. Primatol. 48:153-160.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LASKA, M., SCHüLL, E., and SCHEUBER, H.-P. 1999b. Taste preference thresholds for food-associated sugars in baboons, Papio hamadryas anubis. Int. J. Primatol. 20:25-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • LASKA, M., HERNANDEZ SALAZAR, L. T., RODRIGUEZ LUNA, E., and HUDSON, R. 2000. Gustatory responsiveness to food-associated acids in the spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi). Primates 41:175-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • NISSENBAUM, J. W. and SCLAFANI, A. 1987. Qualitative differences in polysaccharide and sugar tastes in the rat: A two-carbohydrate taste model. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 11:187-196.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • PFAFFMANN, C. 1977. Biological and behavioral substrates of the sweet tooth, pp. 3-24, in J. M. Weiffenbach (ed.). Taste and Development. The Genesis of Sweet Preference. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • PLATA-SALAMAN, C. R., SCOTT, T. R., and SMITH-SWINTOSKY, V. L. 1993. Gustatory neural coding in the monkey cortex: The quality of sweetness. J. Neurophysiol. 69:482-493.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • REHNBERG, B. G., MACKINNON, B. I., HETTINGER, T. P., and FRANK, M. E. 1996. Analysis of polysaccharide taste in hamsters: Behavioral and neural studies. Physiol. Behav. 59:505-516.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • RICHTER, C. P. and CAMPBELL, K. H. 1940. Taste thresholds and taste preferences of rats for five common sugars. J. Nutr. 20:31-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSS, C. 1992. Basal metabolic rate, body weight and and diet in primates: An evaluation of the evidence. Folia Primatol. 58:7-23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SAKO, N., SHIMURA, T., KOMURE, M., MOCHIZUKI, R., MATSUO, R., and YAMAMOTO, T. 1994. Differences in taste responses to polycose and common sugars in the rat as revealed by behavioral and electrophysiologcal studies. Physiol. Behav. 56:741-745.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SCLAFANI, A. 1991. Starch and sugar tastes in rodents: An update. Brain Res. Bull. 27:383-386.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SCLAFANI, A. and CLYNE, A. E. 1987. Hedonic response of rats to polysaccharide and sugar solutions. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 11:173-180.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SCLAFANI, A. and MANN, S. 1987. Carbohydrate taste preferences in rats: Glucose, sucrose, maltose, fructose and polycose compared. Physiol. Behav. 40:563-568.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SCLAFANI, A. and NISSENBAUM, J. W. 1987. Taste preference thresholds for polycose, maltose, and sucrose in rats. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 11:181-185.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SIEGEL, S. and CASTELLAN, N. J. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPECTOR, A. C. 2000. Linking gustatory neurobiology to behavior in vertebrates. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 24:391-416.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SUNDERLAND, G. and SCLAFANI, A. 1988. Taste preferences of squirrel monkeys and bonnet macaques for polycose, maltose and sucrose. Physiol. Behav. 43:685-690.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laska, M., Kohlmann, S., Scheuber, HP. et al. Gustatory Responsiveness to Polycose in Four Species of Nonhuman Primates. J Chem Ecol 27, 1997–2011 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012286719241

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012286719241

Navigation