Skip to main content
Log in

The Variability of Estimates of Variance, and Its Effect on Power Analysis in Monitoring Design

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Power analysis can be a valuable aid in the design of monitoringprograms. It requires an estimate of variance, which may come from a pilot study or an existing study in a similar habitat. For marine benthic infauna, natural variation in abundances canbe considerable, raising the question of reliability of varianceestimates. We used two existing monitoring programs to generatemultiple estimates of variance. These estimates were found to differ from nominated best estimates by 50% or more in 43% of cases, in turn leading to under or over-estimation of samplesize in the design of a notional monitoring program. The twostudies, from the same general area, using the same samplingmethods and spanning a similar time scale, gave estimatesvarying by more than an order of magnitude for 25% of taxa.We suggest that pilot studies for ecological monitoring programsof marine infauna should include at least two sampling times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alden, R. W., III, Dahiya, R. C. and Young, R. J., Jr.: 1982, ‘A method for the enumeration of zooplanktonsubsamples’, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 59, 185–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, N. L. and Mapstone, B. D.: 1987, ‘Sampling and the descriptionof spatial pattern in marine ecology’, Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 25, 39–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassie, R. M.: 1971, ‘Sampling andstatistics’, in W. T. Edmondson and G. G. Winberg (eds), A Manual on Methods for the Assessment of Secondary Productivity in Fresh Waters. International Biological Programme Handbook No. 17. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. pp. 174–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R.: 1993, ‘Non-parametric multivariate analyses of change in community structure’, Aust. J. Ecol. 18, 117–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.: 1988, ‘Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences’, (2nd ed.) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt, L. L.: 1978, ‘Appraising variability in population studies’, J. Wildl. Manage. 42, 207–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, P.G.: 1991, ‘Statistical power and design requirements for environmental monitoring#x2019;, Aust. J.Mar. Freshwater Res. 42, 555–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faul, F. and Erdfelder, E.: 1992, GPOWER: A Priori, Post-hoc and Compromise Power Analyses for MS-DOS (Version 2.0), Bonn University, Dep. of Psychology, Bonn, FRG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. H.: 1989, ‘Power analysis and practical strategies for environmental monitoring’,Environ. Res. 50, 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidelbaugh,W. S. and Nelson,W. G.: 1996, ‘A power analysis of methods for assessment ofchange in seagrass cover’, Aquat. Bot. 53, 227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. K.: 1998, ‘Spatiotemporal variability of temperate lakemacroinvertebrate communities: detection of impact’, Ecol. Appl. 8, 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keough, M. J. and Mapstone, B. D.: 1995,‘Protocols for designing marine ecological monitoring programs associated with BEK mills’, National Pulp Mills Research Program, Technical Report No. 11. CSIRO, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keough, M. J. and Mapstone, B. D.: 1997, ‘Designing environmental monitoring for pulp millsin Australia’, Wat. Sci. Tech. 35(2#x2014;3), 397–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapstone, B. D.: 1995, ‘Scalable decision rules for environmental impactstudies: effect size, Type I, and Type II errors’, Ecol. Appl. 5, 401–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marine Science and Ecology.: 1990, ‘Study of thediet of flathead Platycephalus bassensis and school whiting Sillago flindersi from the Gippsland coast, Victoria’, unpublished report to the Latrobe Valley Water and Sewerage Board.

  • McArdle, B. H. and Pawley, M. D. M.: 1994, ‘Cost Benefit Analysis in the Design of BiologicalMonitoring Programs: Is it Worth the Effort?’, in D. J. Fletcher and B. F. J. Manly (eds), Statistics in Ecology and Environmental Monitoring. Otago Conference Series 2. University of Otago Press, Dunedin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osenberg, C.W., Schmitt, R. J., Holbrook, S. J., Abu-Saba, K. E.and Flegal, A. R.: 1994, ‘Detection of environmental impacts: natural variability, effect size and power analysis’, Ecol. Appl. 4, 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, T. H., Gray, J. S and Johannessen, P. J.: 1983, ‘Objective selection of sensitive species indicative of pollution-induced changein benthic communities. 2. Data analyses’, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 12, 237–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. H., Kennicutt, M. C., II, Green, R. H., Montagna, P., Harper, D. E., Jr., Powell, E. N. and Roscigno, P. F.: 1996, ‘Ecological consequences of environmental perturbations associated with offshore hydrocarbon production: a perspective on long-term exposures in the Gulf of Mexico#x2019;, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53, 2637–2654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plymouth Marine Laboratory (NERC): 1994, PRIMER: Plymouth Routines in Multivariate Ecological Research (Version4.0), Plymouth, UK.

  • SPSS Inc.: 1997, SYSTAT 7.0 for Windows, Chicago, IL.

  • Warwick, R. M.: 1988, ‘The level of taxonomicdiscrimination required to detect pollution effects on marine benthic communities’, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 19, 259–268.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet M. Carey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carey, J.M., Keough, M.J. The Variability of Estimates of Variance, and Its Effect on Power Analysis in Monitoring Design. Environ Monit Assess 74, 225–241 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014280405278

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014280405278

Navigation