Skip to main content
Log in

Pea responses to saline stress is affected by the source of nitrogen nutrition (ammonium or nitrate)

  • Published:
Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of the source of nitrogen nutrition (ammonium or nitrate), onthe response of pea plants to a moderate saline stress (30 mMNaCl)was studied. Growth declined under saline stress but nitrate-fed plants wereless sensitive to salinity than ammonium-fed plants. This different sensitivitywas due mainly to a better maintenance of root growth in nitrate-fed plants.Organic nitrogen content decreased significantly in roots of ammonium-fedplants. Water relations changed slightly under saline stress leading to adecrease in stomatal conductance, which was correlated to a decline in carbonassimilation rates regardless of nitrogen source. Salinity affects the uptakeofseveral nutrients in a different way, depending on the nitrogen source. Thus,chloride was accumulated mainly in nitrate-fed plants, displacing nitrate,whereas sodium was accumulated mainly in ammonium-fed plants, especially inroots, displacing other cations such as ammonium and potassium. It is concludedthat the nitrogen source (ammonium or nitrate) is a major factor affecting pearesponses to saline stress, plants being more sensitive when ammonium is thesource used. The different sensitivity is discussed in terms of a competitionfor energy between nitrogen assimilation and sodium exclusion processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amthor J.S. 1984. The role of the maintenance respiration in plant growth. Plant Cell Environ. 7: 561–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • AOAC 1990. Official methods of analysis.: 127–129.

  • Ashraf M. 1994. Breeding for salinity tolerance in plants. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 13: 17–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker A.V. and Mills H.A. 1980. Ammonium and nitrate nutrition of horticultural crops. Hortic. Rev. 2: 395–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker A.V., Volk R.J. and Jackson W.A. 1966. Growth and nitrogen distribution patterns in bean plants Phaseolus vulgaris L. subjected to ammonium nutrition: I Effects of carbonates and acidity control. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 30: 228–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry J.A. and Downton W.J.S. 1982. Environmental regulation of photosynthesis. In: Govindjee M. (ed.), Photosynthesis: Development, Carbon metabolism and Plant Productivity. Vol. 2. Academic Press, New York, pp. 263–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom A.J., Sukrapanna S.S. and Warner R.L. 1992. Root respiration associated with ammonium and nitrate absorption and assimilation by barley. Plant Physiol. 99: 1294–1301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botella M.A., Martínez V., Nieves M. and Cerdá A. 1997. Effect of salinity on the growth and nitrogen uptake by wheat seedlings. J. Plant Nutr. 20: 793–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeais-Chaillou P., Perez-Alfocea F. and Guerrier G. 1992. Comparative effects of N-sources on growth and physiological responses of soybean exposed to NaCl-stress. J. Exp. Bot. 43: 1225–1233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaillou S., Rideout J.W., Raper C.D. and Morot-Gaudry J.F. 1994. Responses of soybean to ammonium and nitrate supplied in combination to the whole root system or separately in a splitroot system. Physiol. Plant. 90: 259–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer G.R., Läuchli A. and Polito V.S. 1985. Displacement of Ca2+ by Na+ from the plasmalemma of root cells. A primary response to salt stress?. Plant Physiol. 79: 207–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evangelou V.P. 1994. Influence of sodium on soils of humid regions. In: Pessarakli M. (ed.), Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 31–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frechilla S., Gonzalez E.M., Royuela M., Arrese-Igor C., Lamsfus C. and Aparicio-Tejo P.M. 1999. Source of nitrogen nutrition affects pea growth involving changes in stomatal conductance and photorespiration. J. Plant Nutr. 22: 911–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn E.P., Brown J.J. and Blumwald E. 1999. Salt tolerance and crop potential of halophytes. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 18: 227–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattan S.R. and Grieve C.M. 1994. Mineral nutrient acquisition and response by plants grown in saline environments. In: Pessarakli M. (ed.), Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 203–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenway H. and Munns R. 1980. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31: 149–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins H.J. and Lewis O.A.M. 1993. Effect of NaCl salinity, nitrogen form, calcium and potassium concentration on nitrogen uptake and kinetics in Triticum aestivum L. cv. Gamtoos. New Phytol. 124: 171–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafkafi U., Valoras N. and Letey J. 1982. Chloride interaction with nitrate and phosphate nutrition in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). J. Plant Nutr. 5: 1369–1385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leidi E.O., Silberbush M. and Lips S.H. 1991. Wheat growth as affected by nitrogen type, pH and salinity. I. Biomass production and mineral composition. J. Plant Nutr. 14: 235–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis O.A.M. 1986. The processing of inorganic nitrogen by the plant. In: Plants and Nitrogen. Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd, London, pp. 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis O.A.M., Leidi E.O. and Lips S.H. 1989. Effect of N source on growth response to salinity stress in maize and wheat. New Phytol. 111: 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H. 1986. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2nd edn. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu X., Bressan R., Hasegawa P. and Pardo J. 1995. Ion homeostasis in NaCl stress environments. Plant Physiol. 109: 735–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pessarakli M. and Tucker T.C. 1985. Ammonium (15N) metabolism in cotton under salt stress. J. Plant Nutr. 8: 1025–1045.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigaud J. and Puppo A. 1975. Indole-3-acetic catabolism by soybean bacteroid. J. Gen. Microbiol. 88: 223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholander P.F., Hammel H.T., Bradstreet E.D. and Hemmingsen E.A. 1965. Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science. 148: 339–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibole J.V., Montero E., Cabot C., Poschenrieder C. and Barceló J. 1998. Role of sodium in the ABA-mediated long-term growth response of bean to salt stress. Physiol. Plant. 104: 299–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberbush M. and Lips S.H. 1998. Nitrogen concentration, ammonium/ nitrate ratio and NaCl concentration in vegetative and reproductive growth of peanuts. Physiol. Plant. 74: 493–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon M., Ariel R., Hodson M.J., Mayer A. and Poljakoff-Mayber A. 1987. Ion absorption and allocation of carbon resources in excised pea roots grown in liquid medium in absence or presence of NaCl. Ann. Bot. 59: 387–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer M. and Kaiser W.M. 1994. Replacement of nitrate by ammonium as the nitrogen source increases the salt sensitivity of pea plants II Inter-and intracellular solute compartmentation in leaflets. Plant Cell Environ. 17: 1223–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer M., Brune A. and Kaiser W.M. 1994. Replacement of nitrate by ammonium as the nitrogen source increases the salt sensitivity of pea plants I Ion concentrations in roots and leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 17: 1215–1221.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frechilla, S., Lasa, B., Ibarretxe, L. et al. Pea responses to saline stress is affected by the source of nitrogen nutrition (ammonium or nitrate). Plant Growth Regulation 35, 171–179 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014487908495

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014487908495

Navigation