Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trends and perspectives in flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To better understand future needs in manufacturing and their enabling technologies, a survey of experts in manufacturing has been conducted. The survey instrument (i.e., questionnaire) tries to assess the experience to date with the use of flexible manufacturing systems (FMS) and to examine the potential roles and enabling technologies for reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMS). The results show that two-thirds of respondents stated that FMSs are not living up to their full potential, and well over half reported purchasing FMS with excess capacity (which was eventually used) and excess features (which in many cases were not eventually used). They identified a variety of problems associated with FMS, including training, reconfigurability, reliability and maintenance, software and communications, and initial cost. However, despite these issues, nearly 75% of respondent expressed their desire to purchase additional, or expand existing FMSs. The experts agreed that RMS (which can provide exactly the capacity and functionality needed, exactly when needed) is a desirable next step in the evolution of production systems. The key enabling technologies for RMS were identified as modular machines, open-architecture controls, high-speed machining, and methods, training and education for the operation of manufacturing systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashley, S. (1997) Manufacturing firms face the future. Mechanical Engineering, 119(6), 70-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, S. (1997) Rapid-response design. Mechanical Engineering, 119(12), 72-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attaran, M. (1995) Role in CIM success. Industrial Engineering, 27, 28-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, R. U., Haywood, W. and Tchijov I. (1992) The diffusion of FMS. CIM, Vol. II, Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, pp. 197-248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorkman, T. (1996) The rationalization movement in perspective and some ergonomic implications. Applied Ergonomic, 27(2), 111-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollinger, J. and Rusnak, R. (1998) A vision for manufacturing in 2020. NSF Design and Manufacturing Grantees Conference, Monterey, Mexico, January 1998.

  • Brown, J., Harhen, J. and Shivnan, J. (1988) Production Management Systems: A CIM Perspective, Addison-Wesley, Workingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzacott, J. A. (1995) A perspective on new paradigm in manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 4(2), 118-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finegold, D., Brendley, K., Lempert, R., Henry, D., Cannon, P., Boulinghouse, B. and Nelso, M. (1994) The decline of the US machine-tool industry and prospects for its sustainable recovery, Rand Institute, Santa Monica, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • FMS. Too much, too soon. Manufacturing Engineering, March 1987, 34-38.

  • FMS. Manufacturing Engineering, July 1993, 104-109.

  • Goldman, S. L., Nagel, R. N. and Preiss, K. (1995) Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, G. A. (1988) Automation Encyclopedia, SME.

  • Heytler, P. and A. G. Ulsoy, (1998) A Survey of Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems (RMSs), Internal Report, Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Machining Systems (ERC/RMS), The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, Y. (1988) The production environment of an SME in the year 2000, in Flexible Manufacturing for Small and Medium Enterprises, K. McGuigan (ed.), IFS/Springer, 1988, pp. 207-234.

  • Jaikumar, R. (1986) Post industrial manufacturing. Harvard Business Review.

  • Koren, Y. and Ulsoy, A.G. (1997) Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Machining Systems (ERC/RMS) Report # 1, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koren, Y., Heisel, U., Jovane, F., Moriwoki, T., Pritschow, G., Ulosy, A.G. and Van Bruseel, H. (1999) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Annals of the CIRP, 2, 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak, A. and He, D. W. (1997) Design for agile assembly: an operational perspective. International Journal of Production Reserarch, 35(1), 157-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G. H. (1997) Reconfigurability consideration design of components and manufacturing systems. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 13(5), 376-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (1997) Overview and perspectives on Japanese manufacturing strategies and production practices in machinery industry. ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 119, 726-731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1993) New evidence on the economic effects and diffusion of FMS. IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, 40(1), 76-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabi, M. G., Ulsoy, A. G. and Koren, Y. (2000) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems and their enabling technologies. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 1(1), 113-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabi, M. G. and Ulsoy, A. G. (1997) State-of-the-Art in Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, Report # 2, Vol. I, Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Machining Systems (ERC/RMS), The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC), (1998) Visionary Manufacturing Challenges for 2020, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. Also available in http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/visionary/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Next-Generation Manufacturing (NGM) Project, (1997) Next-Generation Manufacturing: A Framework for Action, Agility Forum, Leaders for Manufacturing, and Technologies Enabling Agile Manufacturing, Bethlehem, PA.

  • Noaker, P. M. (1994) The search for agile manufacturing. Manufacturing Engineering, 13, 40-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, G. G. and Bottaci, L. (1997) Modular production systems: a new manufacturing paradigm. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 8, 147-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, A. M. (1996) Adopting advanced manufacturing technologies: experience from Spain. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 15(2), 133-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, J. H. (1993) Agile manufacturing: step beyond lean manufacturing. Industry Week, 30-46.

  • The Association for Manufacturing Technology (AMT) Report. (1996) A Technology Roadmap for the Machine Tool Industry, McLean, Virginia.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2125, USA

    M. G. Mehrabi, A. G. Ulsoy, Y. Koren & P. Heytler

Authors
  1. M. G. Mehrabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. G. Ulsoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Y. Koren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Heytler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehrabi, M.G., Ulsoy, A.G., Koren, Y. et al. Trends and perspectives in flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 13, 135–146 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014536330551

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014536330551

Search

Navigation