Skip to main content
Log in

Tei-index in symptomatic patients with primary and secondary mitral regurgitation

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Significant mitral regurgitation (MR) may result from primary valve dysfunction or develop secondary to ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy. The index ‘isovolumic contraction time and isovolumic relaxation time divided by ejection time’ (ICT + IRT/ET, ‘Tei-index’) is a well established measure of global cardiac function in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and cardiac amyloidosis. We sought to define the diagnostic value of the Tei-index in patients with significant MR of various origin. Sixteen asymptomatic control subjects (8 male (m)/8 female (f), age 62 ± 8 years, control group), 12 patients with primary MR (PMR) (mean grade 3.1 ± 0.3, due to rupture of the chordae tendineae (n = 2), flail leaflet (n = 1), valve prolaps (n = 6) or rheumatic degeneration (n = 3), 6 m/6 f, age 58 ± 18 years, NYHA class 2.5 ± 0.3, PMR group) and 25 patients with secondary MR (SMR) (mean grade 3.1 ± 0.3; due to ischemic (n = 14) or dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 10), 19 m/6 f, age 60 ± 11 years, NYHA class 3.1 ± 0.5, SMR group) underwent conventional two-dimensional (2D) and Doppler echocardiographic examination including measurement of the Tei-index. In the SMR group, left ventricular ejection fraction was reduced compared to the control and the PMR group (29 ± 13% vs. 59 ± 8% and 59 ± 8%, p < 0.001 for both comparisons). The E/A ratio was elevated in PMR and SMR groups in comparison to the control group (1.74 ± 0.44 and 1.70 ± 0.45 vs. 1.09 ± 0.28, p < 0.05). The Tei-index was easily and reproducibly measured in all study subjects. The mean value of the index was significantly elevated in the SMR group compared to control and PMR groups (0.87 ± 0.3 vs. 0.42 ± 0.07 and 0.38 ± 0.05, p < 0.001). The difference between the control group and the PMR group did not reach statistical significance. In MR patients, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the Tei-index yielded an area under the curve of 0.96 ± 0.03 for separating the PMR and the SMR group. Using a Tei-index ≥ 0.51 as a cutpoint, SMR was identified with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 88%. In MR patients, a significant correlation between left ventricular end-systolic volume and the Tei-index was observed (r = 0.71, p < 0.01). The Tei-index is a feasible and sensitive indicator of overall cardiac dysfunction in severely symptomatic patients with significant MR secondary to ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy. The index is in the normal range in symptomatic patients with PMR and preserved systolic function. The Tei-index differentiates between patients with SMR and PMR and may be useful in the work-up of such patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braunwald E. Valvular heart disease. In: Braunwald E editor. Heart Disease. A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1992; 1018–1034.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chandraratna PAN, Aronow WS. Mitral valve ring in normal vs. dilated left ventricle. Chest 1981; 79: 151–154.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alam M, Sun I. Superiority of transesophageal echocardiography in detecting ruptured chordae tendineae. Am Heart J 1991; 121: 1819–1821.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cziner DG, Rosenzweig BP, Katz ES, et al. Transesophageal vs. transthoracic echocardiography for diagnosis mitral valve perforation. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 1495–1497.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Daniel WG, Erbel R, Kasper W, et al. Safety of transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation 1991; 83: 817–821.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Perrenoud JJ, Frangos A, Bopp P. Diastolic mitral gradient without associated valvular stenosis. Usefulness of two-dimensional echocardiography for a correct diagnosis. J Clin Ultrasound 1983; 11: 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Recusani F. Non-invasive assessment of left ventricular function with continous wave Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 1991; 83: 2141–2143.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohn KE, Rao BS, Russell JAG. Force generation and shortening capabilities of left ventricular myocardium in primary and secondary forms of mitral regurgitation. Br Heart J 1969; 31: 472–479.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eckberg DL, Gault JH, Bouchard RL, et al. Mechanics of left ventricular contraction in chronic severe mitral regurgitation. Circulation 1973; 47: 1252–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Borow K, Green L, Mann T, et al. End-systolic volume as a predictor of postoperative left ventricular performance in volume overload from valvular regurgitation. Am J Med 1980; 68: 655–663.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tei C. New non-invasive index for combined systolic and diastolic ventricular function. J Cardiol 1995; 26: 396–404.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tei C, Dujardin KS, Hodge DO, et al. Doppler index combining systolic and diastolic myocardial performance: clinical value in cardiac amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 658–664.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dujardin K, Tei C, Yeo TC, et al. Prognostic value of a Doppler index combining systolic and diastolic performance in idiopathic-dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 1071–1076.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bruch C, Schmermund A, Marin D, et al. Tei-index in patients with mild to moderate congestive heart failure. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1888–1895.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cooper JW, Nanda NC, Philpot EF, et al. Evaluation of valvular regurgitation by color Doppler. J Am Soc Echo 1989; 2: 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. Recommendations for quantification of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echo 1989; 2: 358–367.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quinones MA, Waggoner AD, Reduto LA, et al. A new simplified and accurate method for determining ejection fraction with two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1981; 64: 744–753.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Klein AJ, Burstow DJ, Tajik AJ, et al. Effects of age on left ventricular dimensions and filling dynamics in 117 normal persons. Mayo Clin Proc 1994; 69: 212–224.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rakowski H, Appleton C, Chan KL, et al. Canadian consensus recommendations for measurement and reporting of diastolic dysfunction by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1996; 9: 736–760.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weissler AM, Harris WS, Schoenfeld CD. Systolic time intervals in heart failure in man. Circulation 1968; 37: 149–159.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nishimura RA, Abel MD, Hatle LK, et al. Assessment of diastolic function of the heart: background and current applications of Doppler echocardiography. Part II. Clinical studies. Mayo Clin Proc 1989; 64: 181–204.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weissler AM, Peeler RG, Roehll WH Jr. Relationships between left ventricular ejection time, stroke volume, and heart rate in normal individuals and patients with cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J 1961; 62: 367–378.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thomas JD, Weyman AE. Echo Doppler evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function: physics and physiology. Circulation 1991; 84: 977–990.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Grossman W, Braunwald E, Mann T, et al. Contactile state of the left ventricle in man as evaluated from end-systolic pressure–volume relations. Circulation 1977; 56: 845.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruch, C., Schmermund, A., Dagres, N. et al. Tei-index in symptomatic patients with primary and secondary mitral regurgitation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 18, 101–110 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014664418322

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014664418322

Navigation