Skip to main content
Log in

The Fixed Weighting Nature of A Cross-Evaluation Model

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cross-evaluation has been touted as a powerful extension of Data Envelopment Analysis that provides, not only a unique ordering among the Decision Making Units (DMUs), but also eliminates unrealistic weighting schemes without requiring the elicitation of weight restrictions from application area experts. The goal of this paper is to prove, in the single-input, multiple-output case, cross-evaluation implicitly uses a single fixed set of weights. We demonstrate how this unseen fixed set of weights may still be unrealistic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, R. C. and S. Talluri. (1997). “A Closer Look at the Use of Data Envelopment Analysis for Technology Selection.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 32(1), 101-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes. (1978). “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research 2(6), 429-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. D., J. Doyle, R. Green and M. Kress. (1996). “Ranking Players in Multiple Tournaments.” Computers & Operations Research 23(9), 869-880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. and R. Green. (1994). “Efficiency and Cross-Efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 45(5), 567-578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. R. (1995). “Multiattribute Choice for the Lazy Decision Maker: Let the Alternatives Decide!” Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 62(1), 87-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. R. and R. H. Green. (1995). “Cross-Evaluation in DEA: Improving Discrimination among DMUs.” INFOR 33(3), 205-222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. and J. Doyle. (1995). “On Maximizing Discrimination in Multiple Criteria Decision Making.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 46, 192-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. H., J. R. Doyle and W. D. Cook. (1996). “Preference Voting and Project Ranking Using DEA and Cross-Evaluation.” European Journal of Operational Research 90(3), 461-472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oral, M., O. Kettani and P. Lang. (1991). “A Methodology for Collective Evaluation and Selection of Industrial R&D Projects.” Management Science 37(7), 871-885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, T. R., R. H. Silkman and A. Hogan. (1986). “Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions.” In R. H. Silkman (ed.), Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis. San Francisco: American Evaluation Association, Jossey Bass, Inc. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talluri, S. and J. Sarkis. (1997). “Extensions in Efficiency Measurement of Alternate Machine Component Grouping Solutions via Data Envelopment Analysis.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 44(4), 299-304.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, T.R., Hollingsworth, K. & Inman, L. The Fixed Weighting Nature of A Cross-Evaluation Model. Journal of Productivity Analysis 17, 249–255 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015012121760

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015012121760

Navigation