Skip to main content
Log in

The Kigyo Keiretsu Organization and Opportunism in the Japanese Automobile Manufacturing Industry

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This paper contends that the distinguishing feature of the subcontracting system for the manufacture and distribution of auto-parts in the Japanese automobile manufacturing industry can be explained by the opportunism hypothesis of transaction cost theory. Opportunism may arise when the parts-supplier uses its information advantage to obtain more favorable contract terms with the manufacturer. It is argued that in response to this kind of ‘informational opportunism’, the automobile manufacturer institutes a special form of vertical arrangement, called the kigyo keiretsu group. The kigyo keiretsu group consist of an association of vertically related parts-makers held together by a high degree of sales and technological interdependence, by partial stock ownership, by interlocking boards of directors and by long-term contract. This study raises the possibility of mitigating opportunism among the kigyo keiretsu group firms throughout the core automaker's shareholdings of its parts-supplier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aoki, M. 1987. The Japanese firm in transition. In Y. Yamamura and Y. Yasuba, (eds) The Political Economy of Japan. pp. 469–515. CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asanuma, B. 1984a. Nihon ni okeru buhin torihiki no kozo: Jidosha sangyo no jirei. Kiezai Ronso (English translation: The contractual framework for parts supply in the Japanese automotive industry). Japanese Economic Studies (Summer), 131: 137–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asanuma, B. 1984b. Jidosha sangyo ni okeru buhin torihiki no kozo: Chosei to kakusinteki tekio no mechanism (English translation: The organization of parts purchases in the Japanese automotive industry). Japanese Economic Studies (Summer), 58: 38–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asanuma, B. 1989. manufacture-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 3: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asanuma, B. 1992. Japanese manufacturer-supplier relationships in international perspective: The automobile case. In P. Sheard (ed) International Adjustment and the Japanese Firm, pp. 99–124. Australia: Allen & Unwin Pty. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auto Trade Journal-sha (ed) 1987. Nihon No Jidosha Buhin Kogyo (English translation: The Auto-Parts Industry Yearbook). Tokyo: Auto Trade Journal Sha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. and Uekusa, M. 1976. Industrial Organization in Japan. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, 4: 386–405: repr. (1991). In O.E. Williamson and S.G. Winter (eds) The Nature of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodwell Marketing Consultants. 1986. Industrial Groupings in Japan. Tokyo: Dodwell Marketing Consultants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flath, D. 1989. Vertical integration by means of shareholding interlocks. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 7: 369–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flath, D. 1993. Shareholding in the Keiretsu, Japan's financial groups. Review of Economics and Statistics, 75: 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flath, D. 1996. The Keiretsu puzzle. Journal of Japanese and International Economies, 10: 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruin, M. 1992. The Japanese Enterprise System. Oxford: Claredon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D. 1995. Basic Econometrics, Third edition. Singapore: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai, K. and Komiya, R. (eds) 1994. Business Enterprise in Japan. MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inaba, F. S. and Tabeta, N. 1996. The structure of vertical relationships and transaction costs: Evidence from Japanese automobile manufacturing. Nanyang Technological University, working paper series, No. 29-96, 1–26.

  • Ito, K. 1993. Kabusiki Mochi Ai (Economic roles of cross-shareholdings). In Itami et al. (eds) Nihon No Kigyo Shisutemu (English translation: The Japanese enterprise system), Vol. 1, Ch. 6. Tokyo: Yuuhikaku.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. 1985. Vertical integration and long-term contracts: The case of coal-burning electric generating plants. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1: 33–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. 1990. The performance of long-term contracts: Further evidence from coal markets. Rand Journal of Economics, 21: 251–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. 1991. Asset specificity and structure. In O.E. Williamson and S.G. Winter (eds) The Nature of the Firm. pp. 117–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B. 1980. Transaction cost determinants of ‘unfair’ contractual arrangements. American Economic Review, 70: 356–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B. 1991. Vertical integration as organizational ownership; The Fisher Body-General Motors relationship. In O.E. Williamson and S. G. Winter (eds) The Nature of the Firm. pp. 213–226. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B. Crawford, R. and Alchian, A. 1978. Vertical integration, appropriate rents, and the competitive contracting process. Journal Law and Economics, 21: 297–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B. and Leffler, K. 1981. The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. Journal of Political Economy, 89: 615–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurence, R.Z. 1993. Japan's different trade regime: An analysis with particular performance to Keiretsu. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7: 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. 1993. Industrial Economics. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsushita, M. 1990. Introduction to Japanese Anti-monopoly Law. Tokyo: Yuhikaku Publishing Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Finance, (ed) 1987. Yuka Shoken Hokokusho Soran (English translation: Annual. Corporation Reports, various companies). Tokyo: Ministry of Finance Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteverde, K. and Teece, D. J. 1982a. Supplier-switching costs and vertical integration. Bell Journal of Economics, 13: 206–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteverde, K. 1982b. Appropriate rents and quasi-vertical integration. Journal of Law and Economics, 25: 321–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakatani, I. 1984. The economic role of financial corporate grouping. In M. Aoki (ed) The Economic Analysis of the Japanese Firm. pp. 227–258. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishiguchi, T. 1993. Strategic Industrial Sourcing: The Japanese Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabeta, N. 1989. The mechanism of vertical integration: A case study of the Japanese automobile manufacturing industry. Ph.D. Dissertation. WA: Washington State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabeta, N. and Rahman, S. 1997. Testing for the risk-absorption hypothesis in the Japanese automobile manufacturing industry. Asian Economies, 26: 52–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyo Keizai Shinpo Sha (ed) 1988. Kigyo Keiretsu Soran (English translation: Survey of Corporate Groups). Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Shinpo Sha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyo Keizai Shinpo Sha (ed) 1995. Kigyo Keiretsu Soran (English translation: Survey of Corporate Groups). Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Shinpo Sha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uekusa, M. 1987. Industrial organization: The 1970s to the present. In Y. Yamamura and Y. Yasuba (eds) The Political Economy of Japan. pp. 469–515. CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1971. The vertical integration of production: Market failure consideration. American Economic Review, 61: 112–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1979. Transaction cost economics: Governance of Contractual relation, Journal of Law and Economics, 22: 233–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1993. Opportunism and its critics. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14: 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tabeta, N. The Kigyo Keiretsu Organization and Opportunism in the Japanese Automobile Manufacturing Industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 15, 1–18 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015428707475

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015428707475

Keywords

Navigation