Skip to main content
Log in

Interlocking Directorates, Firm Strategies, and Performance in Hong Kong: Towards a Research Agenda

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Filling a gap in the interlocks literature which has been largely centered on the West, we present preliminary data on the pattern of interlocking directorates among the top 200 largest corporations in pre-1997 Hong Kong. Then we identify four separate groups of firms in Hong Kong, and suggest propositions based on the resource dependence perspective on the critical relationships among their interlocking directorates, firm strategies, and performance. These propositions have the potential to form the building block of an emerging research agenda that will shed light on the role of interlocking directorates in an increasingly important part of the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Baysinger, B. and Hoskisson, R. 1990. The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects of corporate strategy. Academy of Management Review, 15: 72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisot, M. and Child, J. 1996. From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China's emerging economic order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 600–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B. 1990. Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 419–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D.J. 1992. Power in organizations: A social network perspectives. Research in Politics and Society, 4: 295–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J. 1997. The state of corporate governance in Hong Kong. Corporate Governance, 5(2): 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. 1983. Corporate Profits and Cooptation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 339–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. and Greve, H. 1997. Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 103: 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. 1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 543–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. and Jensen, M. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 327–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, M. 1992. Alliance Capitalism: The Social Organization of Japanese Business. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, J., Gautam, K., and Boeker, W. 1994. The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, W. and Zeithaml, C. 1992. Institutional and strategic choice perspective on board involvement in the strategic decision process. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 766–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, J. 1993. The worldwide web of Chinese business. Harvard Business Review, March–April: 24–36.

  • Li, J. 1994. Ownership structure and board composition: A multi-country test of agency theory predictions. Managerial and Decision Economics, 15: 359–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. and Chen, M. 1997. Does guanxi influence firm performance? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 14: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, M. 1996. What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22: 271–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, M. and Galaskiewicz, J. 1994. Networks of interorganizational relations. In J. Wasserman and J. Galaskiewicz, (eds) Advances in Social Network Analysis. pp. 230–253. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsweek. 1997. A Chinese banquet of red-chip stocks. October 27 (international ed.): 24.

  • Oliver, C. 1997. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 697–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D., Jennings, P., and Zhou, X. 1993. Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large U.S. corporations: Institutional, political, and economic accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 100–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pederson, T. and Thomsen, S. 1997. European patterns of corporate ownership: A twelve-country study. Journal of International Business Studies, 28: 759–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, J.M. 1980. Interlocking Directorates. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M.W. 1997. Firm growth in transitional economies: Three longitudinal cases from China, 1989–96. Organization Studies, 18: 385–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M.W. and Heath, P.S. 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21: 492–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M.W., Lu, Y., Shenkar, O., and Wang, D. 2000. Treasures in the China house: A review of management and organizational research on Greater China. Journal of Business Research (in press).

  • Pettigrew, A. 1992. On studying managerial elites. Strategic Management Journal, 13 (winter special issue): 163–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. 1978. The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding, S.G. 1990. The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism. New York: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R.J. 1987. Director interlocks and corporate profitability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 367–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. 1991. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenkar, O. and von Glinow, M. 1994. Paradoxes of organization theory and research: Using the case of China to illustrate national contingency. Management Science, 40: 56–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokman, F., Ziegler, R., and Scott, J. (eds) 1985. Networks of Corporate Power: A Comparative Analysis of Ten Countries. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidenbaum, M. and Hughes, S. 1996. The Bamboo Network: How Expatriate Chinese Entrepreneurs are Creating a New Superpower in Asia. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, G. 1996. Business groups in a dynamic environment: Hong Kong 1976–1986. In G. Hamilton (ed) Asian Business Networks: pp. 87–114. New York: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. and Pearce, J. 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15: 291–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, E. and Westphal, J. 1996. Director reputation, CEO-board power, and the dynamics of board interlocks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 507–529.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Au, K., Peng, M.W. & Wang, D. Interlocking Directorates, Firm Strategies, and Performance in Hong Kong: Towards a Research Agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 17, 29–47 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015432819596

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015432819596

Keywords

Navigation