Skip to main content
Log in

The Division of Labor, Inequality and Growth

  • Published:
Journal of Economic Growth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a model that links the division of labor and economic growth with the division of wealth in society. When capital market imperfections restrict the access of poor households to capital, the division of wealth affects individual incentives to invest in specialization. In turn, the division of labor determines the dynamics of the wealth distribution. A highly concentrated distribution of wealth leads to a low degree of specialization, low productivity, and low wages. In that case workers are unable to accumulate enough wealth to invest in specialization. Hence, in a highly unequal society, there is a vicious cycle in which the degree of specialization, productivity and wages stay low, wealth and income inequality stays high and the economy stagnates. By contrast, greater equality increases investment in specialization and leads to a greater division of labor and higher long run development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion, P., and P. Bolton. (1997). “A Theory of Trickle Down Growth and Development,” Review of Economic Studies 64, 151–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., E. Caroli, and C. Garcia-Penalosa. (1999). “Inequality and Economic Growth: The Perspective of the New Growth Theories,” Journal of Economic Literature 37, 1615–1660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A., and M. Ogaki. (1996). “Wealth-Varying Intertemporal Elasticities of Substitution: Evidence from Panel and Aggregate Data,” Journal of Monetary Economics 38, 507–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. E., P. Martin, and G. I. P. Ottaviano. (2001). “Global Income Divergence, Trade and Industrialization: The Geography of Growth Take-Offs,” Journal of Economic Growth, 6, 5–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., and A. Newman. (1993). “Occupational Choice and the Process of Development,” Journal of Political Economy 101, 274–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (2000). “Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries,” Journal of Economic Growth 5, 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S., and K. M. Murphy. (1992). “The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs and Knowledge,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 1137–1160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benabou, R. (1996). “Inequality and Growth.” NBER Macroeconomics Annual. MIT Press, pp. 11–74.

  • Bourguignon, F. (1981). “Pareto Superiority of Unegalitarian Equilibria in Stiglitz's Model of Wealth Distribution with Convex Saving Function,” Econometrica 49(6), 1469–1475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynan, K. E., J. Skinner, and S. Zeldes. (1996). “Do the rich save more?” Mimeo.

  • Fershtman, C., and E. Kalai. (1993). “Complexity Considerations and Market Behavior,” Rand Journal of Economics 24(2), 224–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, K. (2000). “A Reassessment of the Relationship Between Inequality and Growth,” American Economic Review 90, 869–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galor, O., and O. Moav. (1999). “From Physical to Human Capital Accumulation: Inequality in the Process of Development,” CEPR discusion paper #2307.

  • Galor, O., and J. Zeira. (1993). “Income Distribution and Macroeconomics,” Review of Economic Studies 60, 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodfriend, M., and J. McDermott. (1995). “Early Development,” American Economic Review 85, 116–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E., and G. Grossman. (1993). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. MIT Press.

  • Kaldor, N. (1956). “Alternative Theories of Distribution,” Review of Economic Studies 23, 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. (1997). “The Dynamic of Smithian Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 939–964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. (2001). “Linkages, Thresholds, and Development,” Journal of Economic Growth 6(1), 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1920). The Economic Consequences of the Peace. Macmillan and Co.

  • Kuznets, S. (1955). “Economic Growth and Income Inequality,” American Economic Review 45, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menchik, P. L., and M. David. (1983). “Income Distribution, Life Time Earnings and Bequests,” American Economic Review 73, 672–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moav, O. (2002). “Income Distribution and Macroeconomics: The Persistence of Inequality in a Convex Technology Framework,” Economics Letters 75, 187–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perotti, R. (1996). “Growth, Income Distribution, and Democracy: What the Data Say,” Journal of Economic Growth 1, 149–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (1997). “The Dynamics of the Wealth Distribution and the Interest Rate with Credit Rationing,” Review of Economic Studies 64, 173–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1987). “Growth Based on Increasing Returns Due to Specialization,” American Economic Review 77, 56–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. (1951). “The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market,” Journal of Political Economy 59, 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomes, N. (1981). “The Family, Inheritance and the Intergenerational Transmission of Inequality,” Journal of Political Economy 89, 928–958.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fishman, A., Simhon, A. The Division of Labor, Inequality and Growth. Journal of Economic Growth 7, 117–136 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015672012193

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015672012193

Navigation