Skip to main content
Log in

The genetic basis of variation among wheat F3 lines in tolerance to competition by ryegrass (Lolium rigidum)

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The heritability of tolerance of wheat F3 lines to competition from annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum), and its relationship to morphological traits, were determined using crosses between wheat cultivars with good and poor competitive ability. Forty F2-derived F3 lines from a cross between two late flowering varieties (Machete × Spear) and 40 from a cross between early flowering varieties (Wilgoyne × Gutha) were grown in the field with and without annual ryegrass. There was significant genetic variation between lines within each of the two populations in a number of aspects of plant growth and development, including yield in monoculture. The estimates of heritability for % yield loss due to competition were 0.25 and 0.57 in the two crosses respectively, indicating that selection for high tolerance to competition in the F3 generation or later should be effective. Fairly strong relationships between height and % yield loss and between leaf length and % yield loss suggest that these may be useful auxiliary traits when selecting for low % yield loss. However, differences between crosses in the magnitude and sign of genetic and phenotypic correlation between traits indicate that competitive ability is a complex character influenced by many factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mokhtari, S., Galwey, N., Cousens, R. et al. The genetic basis of variation among wheat F3 lines in tolerance to competition by ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). Euphytica 124, 355–364 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015752021568

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015752021568

Navigation