Skip to main content
Log in

Knowledge Creation in Strategic Alliances: Another Look at Organizational Learning

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that a certain amount of partner conflict must exist for knowledge creation to occur in a strategic alliance. We argue that such tensions can generate opportunities for firms to challenges each other's assumptions and paradigms, leading to novel perspective and new solutions. This position is contrasted to existing theories that present conflict minimization as the route to alliance success. The paper exploits the generative or double-loop learning process (Liedtka et al. 1997; Argyris and Schon 1996) to build a model of inter-organizational knowledge creation and explicitly considers the implications for partner interactions. We suggest that knowledge creation often occurs in turbulent and discontinuous environments associated with the tension between alliance partners of different cultural origins. This paradox is critical to understanding the reasons why strategic alliances often fall short in their potential to create new knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adler, N.J. 1983. A typology of management studies involving culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 14: 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, N.J. and Graham, J.L. 1989. Cross-cultural interaction: The international comparison fallacy? Journal of International Business Studies, 515–537.

  • Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P.J. H. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, B.N. and Khanna, T. 2000. Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances, Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 295–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. and Schon, D.A. 1996. Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method and Practice. Addison-Wesley Publishing: Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. and Schon, D.A. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley Publishing: Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arino, A. and De la Torre, J. 1998. Learning from failure: Towards an evolutionary model of collaborative ventures. Organization Science, 9(3): 306–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Ballantine: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, D.J. 1991. A resource-based analysis of global competition: The case of the Bearings Industry, Strategic Management Journal, 12: 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, F. and Lorange, P. 1988. Cooperative Strategies in International Business. Lexington Books: Lexington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossnan, M.M., Lane, H.W. and White, R.E. 1999. An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 522–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35: 1504–1511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y.L. 1996. The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? Strategic Management Journal, 17: 55–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ealey, L.A. and Troyano-Bermudez, L. 2000. The automotive industry: A 30,000 mile checkup. The McKinsey Quarterly, 1: 72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, S.W. and Wooldridge, B. 1999. Knowledge creation and social networks in corporate entrepreneurship: The renewal of organizational capability. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Spring: 123–143.

  • Geringer, J.M. 1988. Partner selection criteria for developed country joint ventures. Business Quarterly, 53(1): 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. 1991. Market incumbency and technological inertia, Marketing Science, 10(2): 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation, California Management Review, 33(3): 114–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Nohria, N., and Zaheer, A. 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J. 1993. Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology Partnering: Interorganizational Modes of Cooperation and Sectoral Differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 371–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. 1991. Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K.R. 1988. Strategic alliances and partner asymmetries. In F.J. Contractor and P. Lorange (eds) Cooperative Strategies in international Business, Lexington Books: Lexington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K.R. and Newman, W.H. 1990. Bases of interorganization co-operation: propensity, power, persistence. Journal of Management Studies, 27(4): 417–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.F. 1991. The transactions cost theory of equity joint ventures. Management Science, 37: 483–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review 35(4): 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 1983. The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14: 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G.P. 1991. Organizational Learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1): 88–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A.C. 1996. Creating knowledge through collaboration. California Management Review, 38(1): 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A.C. 1998. Learning and knowledge acquisition through international strategic alliances. Academy of Management Executive, 12: 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A.C. and Beamish, P.W. 1997. Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures, Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 177–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarillo J.C. 1988. On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P., Singh, H., Perlmutter, H. 2000. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 217–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., Gulati, R., and Nohria, N. 1998. The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope, Strategic Management Journal, 19(3): 193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, J.B. 1998. Knowledge creation in Japanese manufacturing companies in Italy. Management Learning, 29(2): 131–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. 1988. Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 319–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. 1989. The stability of joint ventures: Reciprocity and competitive rivalry. Journal of Industrial Economics, 38: 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. 2000. The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 405–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D.M. 1991. Game Theory and Economic Modeling. Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P.J., and Lubatkin, M. 1998. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5): 461–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K., and Sparks, J. 1998. The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9(3): 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, D., Slocum, J.W., and Pitts, R.A. 1997. Building cooperative advantage: Managing strategic alliances to promote organizational learning. Journal of World Business, 32(3): 203–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebeskind, J.P., Oliver, A.L., Zucker, L. and Brewer, M. 1996. Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms, Organization Science, 7(4): 428–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka, J.M., Haskins, M.E., Rosenblum, J.W., and Weber, J. 1997. The generative cycle: Linking knowledge and relationships. Sloan Management Review, 47–58.

  • Macneil, I.R. 1980. The New Social Contract. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Olsen, J. 1989. Institutions Rediscovered. Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. 1978. Patterns in strategy formation, Management Science, 24(9): 934–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.E. 1989. The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 377–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R.P. 1988. Cooperative strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 475–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science, 5(1): 14–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., and Konno, N. 1998. The concept of ‘Ba’: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3): 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Reilly III, C.A. 1998. New United Motors Manufacturing, Inc. (NUMMI). Harvard Business School Case: HR 11, HBS Publishing: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. 1997. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9): 697–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, J.F. 1992. Learning from (and about) March. Organization Science, 3: 744–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkhe, A. 1991. Interfirm diversity, organizational learning, and longevity in global strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(4): 579–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkhe, A. 1993. Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4): 794–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkhe, A., and Miller, S.R. 2000. The structure of optimal trust: A comment and some extensions, Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peridis, T., Oliver, C. and Phan, P.H. 1997. Impact of shared values and interest on strategic alliance effectiveness. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meetings, Boston, MA.

  • Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. 1978. The External Control of Organizations. Harper and Row: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phan, P.H., Butler, J.E. and Lee, S.H. 1994. Learning: Key to leveraging the value of a franchise. ENDEC Journal of Enterprising Culture, 1(3): 367–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension, Routledge & Kegan Paul: London, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W. 1998. Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review, 40(3): 228–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K.G. and Gassenheimer, J.B. 1994. Supplier commitment in relational contract exchanges with buyers: A study of interorganizational dependence and exercised power. Journal of Management Studies, 31: 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebello, K. 1996. Inside Microsoft, BusinessWeek, July 15.

  • Ring, P.S. and Van de Ven, A.H. 1992. Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 483–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R., 1987. Organizations. Second edition, Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B.L. 1997. The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization. Academy of Management Review, 40(5): 1150–1174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B.L. 1999. Transfer of marketing know-how in international strategic alliances: An empirical investigation of the role and antecedents of knowledge ambiguity. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3): 463–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkula, J.M., Baker, W.E. and Noordewier, T. 1997. A framework for market-based organization learning: Linking values, knowledge and behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4): 305–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, T. 1996. Jack Welch's cyber-Czar: Can Gary Reiner make GE's info-technology bet pay off? BusinessWeek, August 5.

  • Snyder, W.M. and Cummings, T.G. 1998. Organization learning disorders: Conceptual model and intervention hypotheses. Human Relations, 51(7): 873–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation. Research Policy, 15: 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Krogh, G. 1998. Care in knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3): 133–153

    Google Scholar 

  • West, G.P. and Meyer, G.D. 1997. Communicated knowledge as a learning foundation. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 5(1): 25–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(2): 269–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa, T. and Phan, P.H. 2000. The impact of ownership structure on Japanese corporate governance. Annual Meetings of the Academy of Management, Toronto, Canada, August (to be presented).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phan, P.H., Peridis, T. Knowledge Creation in Strategic Alliances: Another Look at Organizational Learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 17, 201–222 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015857525048

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015857525048

Keywords

Navigation