Abstract
The one facility one commodity network design problem (OFOC) with nonnegative flow costs considers the problem of sending d units of flow from a source to a destination where arc capacity is purchased in batches of C units. The two facility problem (TFOC) is similar, but capacity can be purchased either in batches of C units or one unit. Flow costs are zero. These problems are known to be NP-hard. We describe an exact O(n 33n) algorithm for these problems based on the repeated use of a bipartite matching algorithm. We also present a better lower bound of Ω(n 2 k *) for an earlier Ω(n 2k) algorithm described in the literature where k=⌊d/C⌋ and k *=min k,⌊(n−2)/2⌋. The matching algorithm is faster than this one for k≥⌊(n−2)/2⌋. Finally, we provide another reformulation of the problem that is quasi integral. This property could be useful in designing a modified version of the simplex method to solve the problem using a sequence of pivots with integer extreme solutions, referred to as the integral simplex method in the literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Chopra, I. Gilboa and S.T. Sastry, Source sink flows with capacity installation in batches, Discrete Applied Math. 85 (1998) 165–192.
J. Hellstrand, T. Larsson and A. Migdalas, A characterization of the uncapacitated network design polytope, OR Letters 12 (1992) 159–163.
T.L. Magnanti and P. Mirchandani, Shortest paths, single origin-destination network design and associated polyhedra, Networks 23(2) (1993) 103–121.
T.L. Magnanti, P. Mirchandani and R. Vachani, Modeling and solving the two facility capacitated network loading problem, Operation Research 43 (1995) 142–157.
V.A. Yemelichev, M.M. Kovalev and M.K. Kravtsov, Polytopes, Graphs and Optimization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984) Translated from Russian by G.H. Lawden.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sastry, T. One and Two Facility Network Design Revisited. Annals of Operations Research 108, 19–31 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016042524674
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016042524674