Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The `Ideal' Victim v Successful Rape Complainants: Not What You Might Expect

  • Published:
Feminist Legal Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article proposes that feminist legal critics need to be able to explain how some rape cases succeed in securing convictions. The means by which rape cases are routinely disqualified in the criminal justice system have received widespread attention. It is well established in feminist legal critique that female complainants are discredited if they fail to conform to an archaic stereotype of the genuine or ‘real’ rape victim. This victim is not only morally and sexually virtuous she is also cautious, unprovocative, and consistent. Defence tactics for discrediting rape testimony involve exposing the complainant's alleged failure to comply with the sexual and behavioural standards of the normative victim.

This understanding of how rape complain(an)ts are disqualified is not predictive, however, of the complainants whose cases succeed in securing convictions. This article reviews some successful Australian rape cases and considers the ways in which they disturb feminist understandings of how rape complaints are discredited in the criminal justice system. It proposes that recent research analysing the discourse of rape trials provides a way of explaining the apparent discrepancies between the ‘ideal’ rape victim and successful complainants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aldunate, R., “Fair Go? Only If You Speak the Lingo and Look the Part”, in ed. Heenan (1995), 176–183.

  • Allen, S., “Sexual Assault Law Reform”, in ed. Heenan (1995), 29–38.

  • Alwishewa, J., “Sexual Assault and Non-English Speaking Background Women: Why Is It a Hidden Issue?”, in ed. Heenan (1995), 267–276.

  • Breckenridge, J. and Carmody, M., ed., Crimes of Violence: Australian Responses to Rape and Child Sexual Assault (St Leonards, N.S.W.: Allen and Unwin, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronitt, S., “No Records. No Time. No Reason”, Current Issues in Criminal Justice 8/2 (1996), 130–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronitt, S., “The Rules of Recent Complaint: Rape Myths and the Legal Construction of the 'Reasonable' Rape Victim”, in ed. Easteal (1998), 41–58.

  • Bronitt, S. and McSherry, B., “The Use and Abuse of Counselling Records in Sexual Assault Trials: Reconstructing the 'Rape Shield'?”, Criminal Law Forum 8/2 (1997), 259–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmody, M. and Bratel, J., “Vulnerability and Denial: Sexual Assault of People with Disabilities”, in ed. Breckenridge and Carmody (1992), 207–218.

  • Carmody, M. and Carrington, K., “Preventing Sexual Violence?”, The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 33/3 (2000), 341–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, P., “Women Blamed for Sex Assaults”, The Age (27 February 1998), A1 and A4.

  • Cossins, A., “Tipping the Scales in her Favour”, in ed. Easteal (1998), 94–106.

  • Department for Women (N.S.W.), “Gender Bias and the Law Project”, in Heroines of Fortitude: The Experience of Women in Court as Victims of Sexual Assault, Summary Report (Woolloomooloo: Department for Women, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Easteal, P., ed., Balancing the Scales: Rape, Law Reform, and Australian Culture (Sydney: The Federation Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S., Female Sexuality and the Law: A Study of Constructs of Female Sexuality as they Inform Statute and Legal Procedure (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrich, S., Real Rape: How the Legal System Victimizes Women Who Say No (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrant, D., “The Riddle of Rape”, The Age (24 November 2001), News Extra 1–2.

  • Fife-Yeomans, J., “Rape Review Sparks Outrage”, The Australian (16 September 1998), 3.

  • Fisher, M. and Ammett, F., “Sentencing of Sexual OffendersWhen Their Victims are Prostitutes and Other Issues Arising Out of Hakopian”, Melbourne University Law Review 18 (1992), 683–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, P., “Monocultural to Multicultural: Issues of Service Equity for Immigrants”, in ed. Breckenridge and Carmody (1992), 196–206.

  • Greer, P., with Breckenridge, J., “'They Throw the Rule Book Away': Sexual Assault in Aboriginal Communities”, in ed. Breckenridge and Carmody (1992), 189–195.

  • Grix, J., “Law's Truth and Other Lies: Women, Sexual Assault and the Criminal Justice System”, Australian Feminist Law Journal 12 (1999), 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heenan, M., ed., Legalizing Justice for All Women: National Conference on Sexual Assault and the Law, Proc. “Legalizing Justice for All Women” Conference, Organized by the Project for Legal Action Against Sexual Assault, Melbourne, November 1995 (Melbourne: Project for Legal Action Against Sexual Assault, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heenan, M. and McKelvie, H., The Crimes (Rape) Act 1991: An Evaluation Report, Department of Justice, Victoria, Rape Law Reform Evaluation Project (Melbourne: Department of Justice, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, T. and Bronitt, S., “Rape Victims on Trial: Regulating the Use and Abuse of Sexual History Evidence”, in ed. Easteal (1998), 76–93.

  • Mack, K., “Continuing Barriers to Women's Credibility: A Feminist Perspective on the Proof Process”, Criminal Law Forum 4 (1993), 327–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F. and Angel, K., “Barriers to Justice – Invisible Survivors”, in ed. Heenan (1995), 94–102.

  • Martin, P.Y. and Powell, R.M., “Accounting for the 'second Assault': Legal Organizations' Framing of Rape Victims”, Law and Social Inquiry 19 (1994), 853–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matoesian, G.M., Reproducing Rape: Domination through Talk in the Courtroom (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, T. and Whitty, N., “What is a Fair Trial? Rape Prosecutions, Disclosure and the Human Rights Act”, Feminist Legal Studies 8 (2000), 145–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberman, M., “Turning Girls into Women: Re-Evaluating Modern Statutory Rape Law”, The Journal of Criminal law and Criminology 85/1 (1994), 15–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J., “Sexual Assault, Multiple Disabilities, and the Law”, in ed. Heenan (1995), 184–190.

  • Puren, N., “Partners in Crime: Romance and its Alibis for Rape” (PhD Thesis, Melbourne: English Department, Monash University, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Real Rape Law Coalition (R.R.L.C.), No Real Justice: The Findings of a Confidential Phone-In on Sexual Assault (Melbourne: Real Rape Law Coalition, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Real Rape Law Coalition (R.R.L.C.), Sexual Assault: The Law v. Women's Experience (Melbourne: Real Rape Law Coalition, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafran, L.H., “Writing and Reading About Rape: A Primer”, St John's Law Review 66 (1993), 981–1045.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scutt, J., “Character, Credit, Context: Women's Lives, Judicial 'Reality'”, in ed. Easteal (1998), 159–173.

  • Sheehy, E., “Legalizing Justice For All Women”, in Legalizing Justice for All Women: National Conference on Sexual Assault and the Law, ed. M. Heenan (Melbourne, Australia: Project for Legal Action Against Sexual Assault, 1995), 8–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C., “Law's Truth/Women's Experience”, in Dissenting Opinions: Feminist Explorations in Law and Society, ed. R. Graycar (Sydney: Allen and Unwin, 1990), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C., Law, Crime and Sexuality: Essays in Feminism (London: Sage Publications, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, K., “Unequivocal Victims: The Historical Roots of the Mystification of the Female Complainant in Rape Cases”, Feminist Legal Studies 8 (2000), 343–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temkin, J., “Prosecuting and Defending Rape: Perspectives from the Bar”, Journal of Law and Society 27/2 (2000), 219–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C., “Sexual Assault: Issues for Aboriginal Women”, in Without Consent: Confronting Adult Sexual Violence, ed. P. Easteal (Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, 1993), 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Community Council Against Violence, A Profile of Rapes Reported to Police in Victoria, 1987–1990, A Research Report undertaken as part of the Inquiry into Violence in Public Places (Melbourne: Victorian Community Council Against Violence, November 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, K., “Sentencing for Rape”, in ed. Easteal (1998), 174–190.

  • Young, A., The Law Report Transcript, A. Young interviewed by L. Haultain, A.B.C. Radio National, (29 July 1997), 5–6. http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/8.30/lawrpt/lstories/lr970729.htm

  • Young, A., “The Waste Land of the Law, The Wordless Song of the Rape Victim”, Melbourne University Law Review 22 (1998), 442–465.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Equity and Learning Programs, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia

    Wendy Larcombe

Authors
  1. Wendy Larcombe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larcombe, W. The `Ideal' Victim v Successful Rape Complainants: Not What You Might Expect. Feminist Legal Studies 10, 131–148 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016060424945

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016060424945

Search

Navigation