Skip to main content
Log in

Minimizing Weighted Number of Early and Tardy Jobs with a Common Due Window Involving Location Penalty

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies a single machine scheduling problem to minimize the weighted number of early and tardy jobs with a common due window. There are n non-preemptive and simultaneously available jobs. Each job will incur an early (tardy) penalty if it is early (tardy) with respect to the common due window under a given schedule. The window size is a given parameter but the window location is a decision variable. The objective of the problem is to find a schedule that minimizes the weighted number of early and tardy jobs and the location penalty. We show that the problem is NP-complete in the ordinary sense and develop a dynamic programming based pseudo-polynomial algorithm. We conduct computational experiments, the results of which show that the performance of the dynamic algorithm is very good in terms of memory requirement and CPU time. We also provide polynomial time algorithms for two special cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F.D. Anger, C.Y. Lee and L.A. Martin-Vega, Single machine scheduling with tight windows, Research Report No. 86-16, Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, University of Florida, Florida (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. K.S. Baker and G.D. Scudder, Sequencing with earliness and tardiness penalties: a review, Operations Research 38 (1990) 22–36.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T.C.E. Cheng, Optimal common due-date with limited completion time deviation, Computers and Operations Research 15 (1988) 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T.C.E. Cheng and M.C. Gupta, Survey of scheduling research involving due date determination decisions, European Journal of Operational Research 38 (1989) 156–166.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F.J. Krämer and C.Y. Lee, Common due-window scheduling, Production and Operations Management Society 2 (1993) 262–275.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Lann and G. Mosheiov, Single machine scheduling to minimize the number of early and tardy jobs, Computers and Operations Research 23 (1996) 769–781.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.Y. Lee, Earliness-tardiness scheduling problems with constant size of due date window, Research Report No. 91-17, Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, University of Florida, Florida (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S.D. Liman, S.S. Panwalkar and S. Thongmee, Determination of common due window location in a single machine scheduling problem, European Journal of Operational Research 93 (1996) 68–74.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.D. Liman and S. Ramaswamy, Earliness-tardiness scheduling problems with a common delivery window, Operations Research Letters 15 (1994) 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Sen and S.K. Gupta, A state-of-art survey of static scheduling research involving due dates, OMEGA 12 (1984) 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.A. Ventura and M.X. Weng, Single machine scheduling with a common delivery window, Journal of the Operational Society 47 (1996) 424–434.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M.X.Weng and J.A. Ventura, A note on common due window scheduling, Production and Operations Management 5 (1996) 194–200.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yeung, W., Oğuz, C. & Cheng, T.E. Minimizing Weighted Number of Early and Tardy Jobs with a Common Due Window Involving Location Penalty. Annals of Operations Research 108, 33–54 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016094508744

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016094508744

Navigation