Skip to main content
Log in

An Iterative Procedure for Evaluating Digraph Competitions

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A competition which is based on the results of (partial) pairwise comparisons can be modelled by means of a directed graph. Given initial weights on the nodes in such digraph competitions, we view the measurement of the importance (i.e., the cardinal ranking) of the nodes as an allocation problem where we redistribute the initial weights on the basis of insights from cooperative game theory. After describing the resulting procedure of redistributing the initial weights, an iterative process is described that repeats this procedure: at each step the allocation obtained in the previous step determines the new input weights. Existence and uniqueness of the limit is established for arbitrary digraphs. Applications to the evaluation of, e.g., sport competitions and paired comparison experiments are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Berge, Graphs and Hypergraphs, North-Holland Mathematical Library, Vol. 6 (1970).

  2. M.A. Berger, An Introduction to Probability and Stochastic Processes (Springer, New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Borm, R. van den Brink, R. Levinsky and M. Slikker, On two new social choice correspondences, CentER Discussion Paper 2000-125, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. van den Brink and P. Borm, Digraph competitions and cooperative games, TI-Discussion Paper, Free University and Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. van den Brink and R.P. Gilles, A social power index for hierarchically structured populations of economic agents, in: Imperfections and Behaviour in Economic Organizations, eds. R.P. Gilles and P.H.M. Ruys (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. H.E. Daniels, Round Robin tournament scores, Biometrika 56 (1969) 295-299.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H.A. David, The Method of Paired Comparisons (Griffin, London, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Joosten, Dynamics, equilibria and values, Ph.D dissertation, Maastricht University, The Netherlands (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.P. Keener, The Perron-Fröbenius theorem and the ranking of football teams, SIAM Review 35 (1993) 80-93.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Laffond, J.F. Laslier and M. Lebreton, The bipartisan set of a tournament game, Games and Economic Behavior 5 (1993) 182-201.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.F. Laslier, Tournament Solutions and Majority Voting (Springer, Berlin, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Rubinstein, Ranking the participants in a tournament, SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 38 (1980) 108-111.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L.S. Shapley, A value for n-person games, in: Annals of Mathematics Studies 28, eds. H.W. Kuhn and A.W. Tucker (Princeton University Press, 1953) pp. 307-317.

  14. L.S. Shapley, Cores of convex games, International Journal of Game Theory 1 (1971) 11-26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borm, P., van den Brink, R. & Slikker, M. An Iterative Procedure for Evaluating Digraph Competitions. Annals of Operations Research 109, 61–75 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016339832755

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016339832755

Navigation