Skip to main content
Log in

The European Court of Justice and the Annulment of the Tobacco Advertisement Directive: Friend of National Sovereignty or Foe of Public Health?

  • Published:
European Journal of Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Case C-376/98 Germany v Council the European Court of Justice annulled a Directive which banned the advertisement and sponsorship of tobacco. The judgment sanctions regulatory policy-making at the national rather than the Community level. The paper examines the legal basis of the annulment, its effect on economic efficiency and the implied role of the Court in the formulation of public policy in Europe. Within the institutional limits of the judicial power to determine policy, the Court focused on whether or not disparate national laws restrict free movement and distort competition and affirmed the primacy of the nation state to regulate economic activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barents, R. (1993). “The Internal Market Unlimited: Some Observations on the Legal Basis of Community Legislation.”Common Market Law Review. 30, 85–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednar, J., Ferejohn, J., & Garrett, G. (1996). “The Politics of European Federalism.”International Review of Law and Economics. 16, 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1992). Stable Money-SoundFinances, European Economy, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R. D. & Drexl, J. (1994). “The Logic of Power in the Emerging EuropeanConstitution: Game Theory and the Division of Powers.” International Review of Law and Economics. 14, 307–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J. A. & Weingast, B. R. (1992). “A Positive Theory of Statutory Interpretation.” International Review of Law and Economics. 12, 263–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S. & Eichenberger, R. (1996). “FOCJ: Competitive Governments for Europe.” International Review of Law and Economics. 16,315–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gely, R. & Spiller, P. T. (1990). “A Rational Choice Theory of Supreme Court Statutory Decision with Applications to the StateFarm and Grove City Cases.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 6, 277–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman, R. P. & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1992).“Fiscal Federalism in Europe.” European Economic Review. 46, 654–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman, R. P. & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1997). “ThePolitical Economy of Federalism.” In D. C. Mueller (ed.), Perspectives on Public Choice. A Handbook, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khana, D. (2001). “The Defeat of the European Tobacco Advertising Directive: A Blow for Health.” Yearbook ofEuropean Law. 20, 113–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancini, G. F. (1991). “Institutional Change in Europe in the 1980s.” In R. O. Keohane & S. Hoffmann (eds.), The New European Community. Decision Making and Institutional Change, Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattli, W. & Slaughter, A.-M. (1998). “Revisiting the European Court of Justice.” International Organization. 52, 177–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNollGast (McCubbins, M., Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. R.). (1990). “Positive and Normative Models of Procedural Rights: An Integrative Approach to Administrative Procedures.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 6,Special Issue, 307–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M. A.(1997). “Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community.” International Organization. 51, 99–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinfeld, D. L. (1987). “The Economics of the Local Public Sector.” In A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (eds.), Handbook of PublicEconomics, vol. II, North Holland, pp. 571–645.

  • Tridimas, T. (1999). The General Principles of EC Law, Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tridimas, T. (2001). “Judicial Review and the Community Judicature; Towards a New European Constitutionalism?” InJ. Wouters & J. Stuyck (eds.), Principles of Proper Conduct for Supranational, State and Private Actors in the EU. Essays in honour of Walter Van Gerven, Intersentia, pp. 71–83.

  • Tsebelis, G. & Garrett, G. (2000). “Legislative Politics in the European Union.” European UnionPolitics. 1, 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh, R. (1996). “Economic Criteria for Applying the Subsidiarity Principle in the European Community:The Case of Competition Policy.” International Review of Law and Economics. 16, 363–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh, R. (2000). “Towardsan Institutional Legal Framework for Regulatory Competition in Europe.” Kyklos. 53, 435–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, Joseph, H. H. (1999). TheConstitution of Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tridimas, G., Tridimas, T. The European Court of Justice and the Annulment of the Tobacco Advertisement Directive: Friend of National Sovereignty or Foe of Public Health?. European Journal of Law and Economics 14, 171–183 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016558909557

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016558909557

Navigation