Skip to main content
Log in

Persistence and minimality in epistemic logic

  • Published:
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We give a general approach to characterizing minimal information in a modal context. Our modal treatment can be used for many applications, but is especially relevant under epistemic interpretations of the operator □. Relative to an arbitrary modal system, we give three characterizations of minimal information and provide conditions under which these characterizations are equivalent. We then study information orders based on bisimulations and Ehrenfeucht–Fraïssé games. Moving to the area of epistemic logics, we show that for one of these orders almost all systems trivialize the notion of minimal information. Another order which we present is much more promising as it permits to minimize with respect to positive knowledge. In S5, the resulting notion of minimal knowledge coincides with well‐established proposals. For S4 we compare the two orders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Andréka, J. van Benthem and I. Németi, Back and forth between modal logic and classical logic, J. of the IGPL 3(5) (1995) 685-720.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. B.F. Chellas, Modal Logic. An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, 1980).

  3. H.-D. Ebbinghaus and J. Flum, Finite Model Theory (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Fagin and M Vardi, An internal semantics for modal logic, in: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (1985) pp. 305-315.

  5. K. Fine, Normal forms in modal logic, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 16 (1975) 229-237.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Fitting, Intuitionistic Logic, Model theory and Forcing (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Grice, Logic and conversation, in: Speech Acts, Syntax and Semantics III, eds. P. Cole and J. Morgan (Academic Press, New York, 1975) pp. 41-58.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.Y. Halpern, Theory of knowledge and ignorance for many agents, J. Logic Comput. 7(1) (1997) 79-108.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. J.Y. Halpern and Y. Moses, Towards a theory of knowledge and ignorance, in: Logics and Models of Concurrent Systems, ed. Kr. Apt (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Hennessy and R. Milner, Algebraic laws for nondeterminism and concurrency, J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 32 (1985) 137-161.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Hintikka, Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Hughes and M. Cresswell, A Companion to Modal Logic (Methuen, London, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.O.M. Jaspars, A generalization of stability and its application to circumscription of positive introspective knowledge, in: Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Computer Science Logic (CSL '90) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Jaspars and E. Thijsse, Fundamentals of partial modal logic, in: Partiality, Modality, Nonmonotonicity, ed. P. Doherty, Studies in Logic, Language and Information (CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1996) pp. 111-141.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Konolige, On the relation between default and autoepistemic logic, Artif. Intell. 35 (1989) 343-382.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. E. Lemmon and D. Scott, The Lemmon Notes: An Introduction to Modal Logic, ed. K. Segerberg (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. Lenzen, Recent work in epistemic logic, Acta Philos. Fennica 30 (1978) 1-219.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. H.J. Levesque, All I know: a study in auto-epistemic logic, Artif. Intell. 42(3) (1990) 263-309.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Łoś, Quelques remarques, théorèmes et problèmes sur les classes définissables d'algèbres, in: Mathematical Interpretation of Formal Systems, eds. Th. Skolem et al. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R.C. Moore, Semantical considerations on non-monotonic logic, Artif. Intell. 25 (1985) 75-94.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Popkorn, First Steps in Modal Logic (Cambridge University Press, 1994).

  22. G. Schwarz and M. Truszczyński, Minimal knowledge problem: a new approach, Artif. Intell. 67 (1994) 113-141.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. R. Stalnaker, A note on non-monotonic modal logic, Artif. Intell. 64 (1993) 183-196.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. J. van Benthem, Modal Logic and Classical Logic (Bibliopolis, Napoli, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  25. W. van der Hoek, J.O.M. Jaspars and E.G.C. Thijsse, Honesty in partial logic, Studia Logica 56(3) (1996) 323-360.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. M. Vardi, A model-theoretic analysis of monotonic knowledge, in: Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'85), ed. A. Joshi (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1985) pp. 509-512.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Hoek, W., Jaspars, J. & Thijsse, E. Persistence and minimality in epistemic logic. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 27, 25–47 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018967130652

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018967130652

Keywords

Navigation