Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selecting a decision model for economic evaluation: a case study and review

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increased use of modelling techniques as a methodological tool in the economic evaluation of health care technologies has, in the main, been limited to two approaches – decision trees and Markov chain models. The former are suited to modelling simple scenarios that occur over a short time period, whilst Markov chain models allow longer time periods to be modelled, in continuous time, where the timing of an event is uncertain. In the context of economic evaluation, a less well developed technique is discrete event simulation, which may allow even greater flexibility.

Taking the economic evaluation of adjuvant therapies for breast cancer as an illustrative example, the process of building a decision tree, a Markov chain model, and a discrete event simulation model are described. The potential benefits and problems of each approach are discussed.

The suitability of the modelling techniques to economic evaluations of health care programmes in general is then discussed. This section aims to illustrate the areas in which the alternative modelling methods may be most appropriately employed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.J. Buxton, Health economics in the 1990's, in: Health Economics of Depression (1st ed.), eds. B. Jonsson and J. Rosenbaum (Wiley, 1993) pp. 1-13.

  2. K. Blumenschein and M. Johannesson, Economic evaluation in healthcare, Pharmacoeconomics 10(2) (1996) 114-122.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.J. Buxton et al., Modelling in economic evaluation: an unavoidable fact of life, Health Economics 6(3) (1997) 217-227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Bloom, M. Buxton, M. Drummond, B. Luce and T. Sheldon, The pros and cons of modelling in economic evaluation, OHE Briefing 33 (1997) 1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Fletcher, N.R. Hicks, J.D.S. Kay and P.A. Boyd, Using decision analysis to compare policies for antenatal screening for Down's syndrome, British Medical Journal 311 (1995) 351-357.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T.A. Lieu, S.E. Watson and A.E. Washington, The cost-effectiveness of prenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis, Obstetrics and Gynaecology 84(6) (1994) 903-912.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.A. Revicki et al., Modelling the cost effectiveness of antidepressant treatment in primary care, Pharmacoeconomics 8(6) (1995) 524- 540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A.H. Briggs, M.J. Sculpher, R.P. Logan, J. Aldous, M.E. Ramsay and J.H. Baron, Cost effectiveness of screening for and eradication of Helicobacter pylori in management of dyspeptic patients under 45 years of age, British Medical Journal 312(7042) (1996) 1321-1325.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Davies and K. Cuninghame, Breast Cancer: Screening and Treatment, House of Commons Library Research Division, Background Paper, 1992.

  10. K.R. Fox, Adjuvant therapies for node-positive operable breast cancer, in: Breast Cancer Treatment - a Comprehensive Guide to Management (1st ed.), eds. B. Fowble, R.L. Goodman, J.H. Glick and E.F. Rosato (Mosby Year Book, 1991) pp. 265-289.

  11. J.H. Glick, Adjuvant therapy for node-negative breast cancer, in: Breast Cancer Treatment - a Comprehensive Guide to Management (1st ed.), eds. B. Fowble, R.L. Goodman, J.H. Glick and E.F. Rosato (Mosby Year Book, 1991) pp. 243-264.

  12. M. Drummond, B. O'Brien, G. Stoddart and G. Torrance, Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2nd ed.) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G.W. Torrance, Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal, Journal of Health Economics 5 (1986) 1-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. National Cancer Institute, Questions and answers about adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, Cancer Facts, 1996. gopher://gopher.ncc. go.jp:70-0/CNET/All_files/600720.

  15. R.D. Gelber, A. Goldhirsch and F. Cavalli, Quality of life adjusted evaluation of adjuvant therapies for operable breast cancer, Annals of Internal Medicine 114 (1991) 620-628.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.R. Beck and S.G. Pauker, The Markov process in medical prognosis, Medical Decision Making 3 (1983) 419-458.

    Google Scholar 

  17. F.A. Sonnenberg and J.R. Beck, Markov models in medical decision making, Medical Decision Making 13(4) (1993) 322-338.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B.E. Hillner, Financial costs, benefits, and patient risk preferences in node-negative breast cancer: Insights from a decision analysis model, Recent Results in Cancer Research 127 (1993) 277-284.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B.E. Hillner and T.J. Smith, Efficacy and cost effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-negative breast cancer - a decision-analysis model, New England Journal of Medicine 324(3) (1991) 160-168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. B.E. Hillner, T.J. Smith and C.E. Desch, Assessing the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant therapies in early breast cancer using a decision analysis model, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 24 (1993) 97-105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. T.J. Smith and B.E. Hillner, The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of adjuvant therapy of early breast cancer in premenopausal women, J. Clin. Oncol. 11 (1993) 771-776.

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. Davies and R. Davies, A simulation model for planning services for renal patients in Europe, Journal of the Operation Research Society 38(8) (1987) 693-700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M.J. Buxton and B.J. O'Brien, Economic evaluation of Ondansetron: preliminary analysis using clinical data prior to price setting, British Journal of Cancer 66(19) (1992) 64-67.

    Google Scholar 

  24. [24] R.B. Jansen, A. Burrell, M.J.C. Nuijten and M. Hardens, An economic evaluation of Meloxicam 7.5 mg versus Diclofenac 100 mg retard in the treatment of osteoarthritis in the UK: a decision analysis model based on gastrointestinal complications, British Journal of Medical Economics 10 (1996) 247-262.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A.S. Midgette, J.B. Wong, J.R. Beshansky, A. Porath, C. Fleming and S.G. Pauker, Cost-effectiveness of streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction: A combined meta-analysis and decision analysis of the effects of infarct location and of likelihood of infarction, Medical Decision Making 14(2) (1994) 108-167.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M.H. Eckman et al., Foot infections in diabetic patients, Journal American Medical Association 273(9) (1995) 712-720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M.D. Danese, N.R. Powe, C.T. Sawin and P.W. Ladenson, Screening for mild thyroid failure at the periodic health examination, Journal American Medical Association 276(4) (1996) 285-292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. M. Johannesson, J. Hedbrant and B. Jonsson, A computer simulation model for cost-effectiveness analysis of cardiovascular disease prevention, Medical Informatics 16(4) (1991) 355-362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. R.W. Klein, R.S. Dittus, S.D. Roberts and J.R. Wilson, Simulation modelling and health care decision making (annotated bibliography), Medical Decision Making 13(4) (1993) 347-354.

    Google Scholar 

  30. B. Jonsson, C. Christiansen, O. Johnell and J. Hedbrandt, Cost-effectiveness of fracture prevention in established osteoporosis, Osteoporosis International 5(136-142) (1995) 136-142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. B. Jonsson, J. Hedbrant and O. Juhnell, A computer simulation model to analyse the cost-effectiveness of fracture prevention of osteoporosis, The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics, 1993.

  32. R. Davies and H.T.O. Davies, Modelling patient flows and resource provision in health systems, Omega, Int. J. Mgmt. Sci. 22(2) (1994) 123-131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. B. Lehaney and R.J. Paul, Using soft systems methodology to develop a simulation of out-patient services, J. Roy. Soc. Health (1994) 248-251.

  34. W.M. Hart, C. Espinosa and J. Rovira, A simulation model of the cost of the incidence of IDDM in Spain, Diabetologia 40 (1997) 311-318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. K.E. Warner, R.J. Smith, D.G. Smith and B.E. Fries, Health and economic implications of a work-site smoking-cessation program: a simulation analysis, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 38(10) (1996) 981-992.

    Google Scholar 

  36. N. Urban, C. Drescher, R. Etzioni and C. Colby, Use of stochastic simulation model to identify an efficient protocol for ovarian cancer screening, Controlled Clinical Trials 18 (1997) 251-270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. J.D.F. Habbema, J.Th.N. Lubbe, G.J. van Oortmarssen and P.J. van der Maas, A simulation approach to cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit calculations of screening for the early detection of disease, European Journal of Operational Research 29 (1987) 159-166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. J.D.F. Habbema, G.J. van Oortmarssen, J.T.N. Lubbe and P.J. van der Maas, The MISCAN simulation program for the evaluation of screening for disease, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 20 (1984) 79-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. M.S. Roberts, Markov process-based Monte Carlo simulation: a tool for modeling complex disease and its application to the timing of liver transplantation, Winter Simulation Conference, 1992.

  40. D.W. Balmer and R.P. Paul, CASM - The right environment for simulation, Journal of the Operational Society 37(5) (1986) 443- 452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. F.A. Sonnenberg, M.S. Roberts, J. Tsevat, J.B. Wong, M. Barry and D.L. Kent, Toward a peer review process for medical decision analysis models, Medical Care 32(7) (1994) 52-64.

    Google Scholar 

  42. P.G. Bolger and R. Davies, Simulation model for planning renal services in a district health authority, BMJ 305 (1992) 605-608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, UK

    Jonathan Karnon & Jackie Brown

Authors
  1. Jonathan Karnon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jackie Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karnon, J., Brown, J. Selecting a decision model for economic evaluation: a case study and review. Health Care Management Science 1, 133–140 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019090401655

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019090401655

Keywords

Search

Navigation