Skip to main content
Log in

Economic Freedom and Growth: Decomposing the Effects

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most studies of the relation between economic freedom andgrowth of GDP have found a positive relation. One problem inthis area is the choice of economic freedom measure. A singlemeasure does not reflect the complex economic environment anda highly aggregated index makes it difficult to draw policyconclusions. In this paper we investigate what specific typesof economic freedom measures that are important for growth.The robustness of the results is carefully analysed since thepotential problem with multicollinearity is one of thenegative effects of decomposing an index. The results showthat economic freedom does matter for growth. This does notmean that increasing economic freedom, defined in generalterms, is good for economic growth since some of thecategories in the index are insignificant and some of thesignificant variables have negative effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayal, E.B. and Karras, G. (1998). Components of economic freedom and growth: An empirical study. The Journal of Developing Areas 32: 327-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 407-443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (1994). Democracy and growth. NBER Working Paper No. 4909, NBER.

  • Barro, R.J. (1999) Inequality, growth and investments. NBER Working Paper No. 7038, NBER.

  • Gwartney, J.D., Lawson, R. and Holcombe, R.G. (1998). The size and functions of the government and economic growth. Joint Economic Committee Study, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, J.D., Lawson, R. and Holcombe, R.G. (1999). Economic freedom and the environment for economic growth. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 155: 643-663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, J. and Lawson, R. with Samida, D. (2000). Economic freedom of the world: 2000 annual report. The Fraser Institute, Vancouver. Data retrieved from http://www.freetheworld.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, J. and Sturm, J.-E. (2000). On the relationship between freedom and economic growth. European Journal of Political Economy 16: 215-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.E. and Jones, C.I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 83-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: Cross country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics 7: 207-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneller, R., Bleaney, M. and Gemmell, N. (1999). Fiscal policy and growth: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics 74: 171-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. and Renelt, D. (1992). A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. American Economic Review 82: 942-963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G.S. (1992). Introduction to econometrics. Prentice Hall.

  • Nelson, M.A. and Singh, R.D. (1998). Democracy, economic freedom, fiscal policy and growth in LDCs: A fresh look. Economic Development and Cultural Change 46: 677-696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997a). I just ran four million regressions.Working Paper No. 6252, NBER.

  • Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997b). I just ran two million regressions. American Economic Review 87: 178-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully G.W. and Slottje, D.J. (1991). Ranking economic liberty across countries. Public Choice 69: 121-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torstensson, J. (1994). Property rights and economic growth: An empirical study. Kyklos 47: 231-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanssay, X. and Spindler, Z.A. (1994). Freedom and growth: Do constitutions matter? Public Choice 78: 359-372.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L.M. (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48: 817-838.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1999). 1999 world development indicators CD-rom. The World Bank.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlsson, F., Lundström, S. Economic Freedom and Growth: Decomposing the Effects. Public Choice 112, 335–344 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019968525415

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019968525415

Keywords

Navigation