Abstract
Science, politics and environmental policy have for several years been encountering social and institutional as well as scientific challenges, national and international. The normative basis of all sciences is pressurised from three sides: by awareness of the public, who claims more transparency and sensibility from the scientific institutions regarding factual or possible impacts of science-based industrial progress; by the industries, which try to speed up and intensify the industrialisation of knowledge; and by the public policies, which want to see the sciences engaged in ways to mitigate unintended consequences of economic, ecological and social developments. At the same time, environmental policy is undergoing a tremendous sea change both in conceptual and practical matters. Since the Brundtland Report in 1987 and accelerated after UNCED 1992, environmental policy has been struggling to become a groundbreaking new paradigm for the capacity of resolving social and political issues as well. Any successful attempt to alter traditional institutional and mental structures in policy-making toward sustainability presupposes a renewed association of co-operation, deliberation and decision making. Results from theory of democracy, studies in science and technology, and evaluation studies in environmental policy and politics can be utilised for this context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bank Sarasin: 2000, 'Wie nachhaltig sind die Erfinder der Nachhaltigkeit? Eine Übersicht über die Forst-und Papierindustrie' (A screening of the forestry, pulp-and paper-industries) (authors: C. Butz and C.Vaterlaus), Bank Sarasin, Zürich.
Bijker, W.,Huge, T. andPinch T. (eds.): 1987, The Social Construction of Technological Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Böhme, G.: 1993, Am Ende des Baconschen Zeitalters, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.
Brockman, J.: 1996, Die dritte Kultur. Das Weltbild der modernen Naturwissenschaft, Goldmann, München (amerik. The Third Culture, Simon & Schuster 1995, New York).
Burns, T. andNeberhorst, R.: 1988, Creative Democracy, Praeger, New York.
Caspari, S.: 1995, Die Umweltpolitik der Europ¨aischen Gemeinschaft. Eine Analyse am Beispiel der Luftreinhaltepolitik, Nomos, Baden-Baden.
Dahl, R.A. andLindblom, C.E.: 2000/ 1953, Politics, Economics & Welfare, with a new introduction by the authors, Transaction Publishers (orig. publ. 1953 Chicago), New Brunswick.
Fischer, F.: 1995, Evaluating Public Policy, Nelson-Hall, Chicago.
Gray, J.: 1998, 'False dawn', The Delusions of Global Capitalism, Granta, London.
Guston, D.H.: 1999, 'Evaluating the first U.S. consensus conference: The impact of the citizens' panel on telecommunications and the future of democracy', Science, Technology and Human Values 24(4), 451-482.
Hempel, L.C.: 1996, 'Environmental governance', The Global Challenge, Island Press, Washington, D. C.
Héritier, A. et al.: 1994, Die Ver¨anderung von Staatlichkeit in Europa, Leske + Budrich, Opladen.
Immler, H. andHofmeister, S.: 1998, Natur als Grundlage und Ziel derWirtschaft. Grundzüge einer Ökonomie der Reproduktion, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen.
IPCC: 1996, Climate Change 1995, The Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 3 Vols., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Jänicke, M. (Hg.): 1996, Umweltpolitik der Industriel¨ander, edition sigma, Berlin.
Jänicke, M, and Weidner, H. (eds.): 1995, Successful Environmental Policy. A Critical Evaluation of 24 Cases, edition sigma, Berlin.
J¨anicke, M, et al.: 1999, Umweltpolitik, J.H.W. Dietz, Bonn.
Kennedy Jr., R.F.: 2000, 'Risk, democracy, and the environment', Risk Analysis 20(3), 306-310.
Korten, D.C.: 1998, The Post-Corporate World. Life after Capitalism, Kumarian Press, West Hartfort/CT.
Kraft, M.E.: 2000, Environmental Policy in Congress: From Consensus to Gridlock, in N.J. Vig andM.E. Kraft (eds), Environmental Policy. New Directions for the 21st Century, 4th edn., Congressional Quarterly, Washington, DC, pp. 121-144.
Krimsky, S.: 1991, 'Biotechnics and society', The Rise of Industrial Genetics, Praeger, New York.
Krimsky, S.: 2000, 'Hormonal chaos', The Scientific and Social Origins of the Environmental Endocrine Hypothesis, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Mazmanian, D.A. andKraft, M.E. (ed.): 1999, 'Toward sustainable communities', Transition and Transformations in Environmental Policy, MIT Press, Cambridge/MA.
Merton, R.K.: 1973, 'The sociology of science', Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, The University Press of Chicago. Chicago.
Miller, H.I.: 1997, Policy Controversy in Biotechnology: An Insider's View, Academic Press, San Diego.
Müller, E.: 1995, Innenwelt der Umweltpolitik, 2nd edn, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen.
Müller-Brandeck-Bocquet, G.: 1996, Die institutionelle Dimension der Umweltpolitik. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung zu Frankreich, Deutschland und der Europäischen Union, Nomos, Baden-Baden.
Münch, R. andLahusen, C. (Hg.): 2000, Regulative Demokratie. Politik der Luftreinhaltung in Großbritannien, Frankreich, Deutschland und den USA, Campus, Frankfurt a.M.
Nakicenovic, N. et al.: 2000, 'Emissions scenarios', A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
OTA: 1991, Biotechnology in a Global Economy, U.S. Govt. Print. Office, Washington, D. C.
Parsons, T. andPlatt, G.M.: 1990, Die amerikanische Universität, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M. (orig. The American University, Cambridge 1972).
Pimentel, D. et al. (ed.): 2000, 'Ecological integrity', Integrating Environment, Conservation, and Health, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Reller, A. et al.: 2000, 'Silicone-eine vollsysnthetische Materialklasse macht Geschichte(n )', GAIA 9, 13-23.
Rifkin, J.: 1998, 'The biotech centruy', The Coming Age of Genetic Commerce, Victor Gollancz, London.
Rosenbaum, W.A.: 1998, Environmental Politics and Policy, 4th edn, Congressional Quarterly, Washington, D.C.
Sclove, R.E.: 1995, Democracy and Technology, The Guildford Press, New York.
Stevis, D. et al.: 1989, International Environmental Politics: A Theoretical Review of the Literature Lester, pp. 289-313.
Thompson-Klein, J. et al. (eds.): 2001, 'Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology and society', An Effective Way for Managing Complexity, Birkhäuser, Basel.
Vig, N.J. andKraft, M.E.: 2000, Environmental Policy. New Directions for the Twenty-First Century, 4th edn, Congressional Quarterly, Washington, D.C.
WBGU: 1996, Wege zur Lösung globaler Umweltprobleme. Jahresgutachten 1995, Springer, Berlin.
WBGU: 1999, Strategien zur Bewöltigung globaler Umweltrisiken. Jahresgutachten 1998, Springer, Berlin.
WBGU: 2001, Neue Strukturen globaler Umweltpolitik. Jahresgutachten 2000, Springer, Berlin.
von Weizsäcker, E.U. et al.: 1995, Faktor vier. Doppelter Wohlstand-halbierter Naturverbrauch. Der neue Bericht an den Club of Rome, Droemer Knaur, München.
Wilson, E.O.: 1998, 'Consilience', The Unity of Knowledge, Little Brown, London.
Winnacker, E.-L.: 2000, 'Auf der Suche nach dem Mehrwert', Forschung 1/2000, 2-3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Albrecht, S.M. Forging New Directions in Science and Environmental Politics and Policy: How Can Co-operation, Deliberation and Decision be Brought Together?. Environment, Development and Sustainability 3, 323–341 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020856306615
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020856306615