Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Antecedent Priming at Trace Positions in Japanese Long-Distance Scrambling

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report the results from three cross-modal lexical decision experiments investigating antecedent priming effects in Japanese. In the first two experiments we examined antecedent reactivation at the preverbal trace position in long-distance scrambling sentences. We found an interaction between the participants' working memory (WM) span and antecedent priming. For the high span group, the magnitude of antecedent priming at the trace position was significantly larger than at the earlier control position; for the low span group, on the other hand, there was no such difference. In a third experiment, we examined whether similar reactivation effects could be observed for argument expressions that are not base-generated adjacent to the verb. Contrary to scrambled objects, subject noun phrases (NPs) in canonically ordered sentences were not reactivated at the preverbal test position in either of the two participant groups. We argue that the priming effect observed in the high span group supports a trace-based account of long-distance scrambling. The degree of complexity of the experimental sentences was such that they exceeded the memory span of the low span group. We conclude that argument traces access their antecedents irrespective of the position of their subcategorizers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Babyonyshev, M., & Gibson, E. (1995). Processing overload in Japanese. In C. Schütze, J. Ganger, and K. Broihier (Eds.), Papers on language processing and acquisition. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 26, Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, H., Nagengast, J., & Klaas, G. (1993). New Experimental Setup (NESU). Manuscript, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berwick, R. C., & Weinberg, A. S. (1984). The grammatical basis of linguistic performance. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bever, T. G., & McElree, B. (1988). Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, H. Y. (1994). Processing of Japanese and Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 77–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1985). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1998). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. MIT Occasional Papers 15, Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., & Lasnik, H. (1993). Principles and parameters theory. In J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld and T. Vennemann (Eds.), Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, (505–569). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clahsen, H., & Featherston, S. (1999). Antecedent priming at trace positions: Evidence from German scrambling. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 415–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vincenzi, M. (1991). Filler-gap dependencies in a null-subject language: Referential and non-referential WHs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 197–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, A. K. (1984). Modularity in syntax: A study of Japanese and syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L. (1985). Syntactic complexity. In D. Dowty, L. Karttunen and A. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L. (1987a). Sentence processing: A tutorial overview. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L. (1987b). Syntactic processing: Evidence from Dutch. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 5, 519–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. (1991). A computational theory of human linguistic processing: Memory limitations and breakdown. PhD Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.

  • Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality and syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson E., & Hickok, G. (1993). Sentence processing with empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 147–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E., & Warren, T. (1998). The psychological reality of intermediate linguistic structure in long-distance extractions. Paper presented at the 11th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New Brunswick, NJ.

  • Hale, K. (1980). Remarks on Japanese phrase structure: Comments on the papers on Japanese syntax. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harada, S.-I. (1977). Nihongo ni henkei wa hituyoo da. Gengo, 6(10), 88–95; 6(11), 96-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. A. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickok, G., Canseco-Gonzales, E., Zurif, E., & Grimshaw, J. (1992). Modularity in locating wh-gaps. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 545–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 159–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 580–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, H., & Sportiche, D. (1991). The position of subjects. Lingua, 85, 211–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, T., & Swinney, D. (1996). Co-reference processing and levels of analysis on object-relative constructions: Demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross modal priming paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, A. (1990). The A/A9 distinction and Movement Theory. Dissertation, MIT. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, A. (1994). Toward a unified theory of scrambling. In N. Corver and H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Studies on scrambling. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazuka, R., & Nagai, N. (Eds.) (1995). Japanese sentence processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazuka, R., Itoh, K., & Kondo, T. (2002). Costs of scrambling in Japanese sentence processing. In M. Nakayama (Ed.), Sentence Processing in East Asian Languages. Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElree, B. (2000). Sentence comprehension is mediated by content-addressable memory structures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1994). Sentential context and on-line lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 1239–1243.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKoon, G., Ratcliff, R., & Allbritton, D. (1996). Sentential context effects on lexical decisions with a cross-modal instead of an all-visual procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1494–1497.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKoon, G., Ratcliff, R., & Ward, G. (1994). Testing theories of language processing: An empirical investigation of the on-line lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1219–1228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., & Chomsky, N. (1963). Finitary models of language users. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology, Vol. 2. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto, E. T., & Takahashi, S. (2002). Sources of difficulty in the processing of scrambling in Japanese. In M. Nakayama (Ed.), Sentence Processing in East Asian Languages (167–188), Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muckel, S., & Penchmann, T. (2000). Trace identification in German: Prosodic hints help before the verb is being processed. Poster presented at the 14th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Nakayama, M. (1990). Accessibility to the antecedent in Japanese sentence processing. Unpublished manuscript, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakayama, M. (1995). Scrambling and probe recognition. In R. Mazuka & N. Nagai (Eds.), Japanese sentence processing (257–273). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemoto, N. (1995). Scrambling in Japanese, AGRoP, and economy of derivation. Lingua, 97, 257–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemoto, N. (1999). Scrambling. In N. Tsujimura (Ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics (121–153). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, J. (1993). Reconsidering reactivation. In G. A. R. Shillcock (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: The second Sperlonga meeting (321–347). Hove: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, J., Fodor, J. D., & Swinney, D. (1994). Using cross-modal lexical decision tasks to investigate sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1229–1238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in conference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, J., Swinney, D., Love, T., & Hald, L. (1997). Examination of sentence processing with continuous vs. interrupted presentation paradigms. Center for Human Information Processing, Technical Report #97-3, U.C.S.D. La Jolla, California.

  • Ninose, Y., Oda, J., Sakaki, Y., Sakamoto, T., & Gyoba, J. (1998). On the real-time processing of empty subjects in Japanese using a dichotic-listening method (2). Cognitive Studies, 5, 82–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oda, J., Ninose, Y., Sakaki, Y., Gyoba, J., & Sakamoto, T. (1997). On the real-time processing of empty subjects in Japanese using a dichotic listening method. Cognitive Studies, 4, 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osaka, M. (1998). Yomi to wakingu memori [Reading and Working Memory]. In N. Osaka (Ed.), Yomi-No to kokoro-no johoshori [Reading-information processing of brain and mind] (239–262). Tokyo: Asakura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osaka, M., & Osaka, N. (1992). Language-independent working memory as measured by Japanese and English reading span tests. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 287–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, M. (1993). Direct association and sentence processing: A reply to Gorrell and to Gibson and Hickok. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 163–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, M., & Barry, G. (1991). Sentence processing without empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6, 229–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, C., & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sag, I., & Fodor, J. D. (1994). Extraction without traces. Proceedings of the 13th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 365–384.

  • Saito, M. (1985). Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, M. (1992). Long distance scrambling in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, 69–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto, T. (1995). Transparency between parser and grammar: On the processing of empty subjects in Japanese. In R. Mazuka, & Nagai, N. (Eds.), Japanese sentence processing (275–294). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, D. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, D., Nicol, J., Ford, M., Frauenfelder, U., & Bresnan, J. (1987). The time course of co-indexation during sentence comprehension. Paper presented at the Psychonomic Society Meeting, Seattle, WA.

  • Tada, H. (1993). A/A-bar partition in derivation. Dissertation, MIT. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonoike, S. (1997). On scrambling: Scrambling as a base-generated scopal construction. In S. Tonoike (Ed.), Scrambling (125–159). Tokyo: Kurosio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traxler, M. J., & Pickering, M. (1996). Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 454–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueyama, A. (1994). Against the A/A´-movement dichotomy. In N. Corver, & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Studies on scrambling: Movement and non-movement approaches to free word-order phenomena. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996). The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: A critique of Just and Carpenter [1992]. Psychological Review, 103, 761–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wydell, T. N. (1991). Processes in the reading of Japanese: Comparative studies between English and Japanese orthographies. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London.

  • Yamashita, H. (1997). The effects of word order and case marking information on the processing of Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 163–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita, H. (2000). Scrambled sentences in Japanese: Linguistic properties and motivations for production. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yatabe, S. (1993). The boundedness of scrambling. In S. Choi (Ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics (Vol. 3, 204–220). Stanford, CA: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yatabe, S. (1996). Long-distance scrambling via partial compaction. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 29 (Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics 2), 303–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurif, E. S., D., Prather, P., & Love, T. (1994). Functional localization in the brain with respect to syntactic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 487–497.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex, United Kingdom

    Yoko Nakano, Claudia Felser & Harald Clahsen

Authors
  1. Yoko Nakano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claudia Felser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Harald Clahsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harald Clahsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakano, Y., Felser, C. & Clahsen, H. Antecedent Priming at Trace Positions in Japanese Long-Distance Scrambling. J Psycholinguist Res 31, 531–571 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021260920232

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021260920232

Search

Navigation