Skip to main content
Log in

Connecting Points: Teacher Decision-Making About Student Data-Collection Technology

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For today's classroom teacher, faced with the prospect of selecting and using data collection technology, a number of questions are emerging, including: 1) Why should my students use this technology? 2) Is the use of this technology appropriate both pedagogically and developmentally? 3) Will the technology persist? 4) Is the use of technology justifiable, given the investment of time (and money) to prepare for its use? 5) How do I choose the type of data-collection technology to use with my students? The article illustrates issues to be considered when addressing these questions. A learner-centered rationale for the use of technology in the science classroom is given. Appropriateness is discussed in terms of standards-driven curricula. Regarding the ‘persistence’ of the technology, a ‘reciprocal evolution’ is suggested, with educator use dictating in part the actual development of new technology. Justifiable and proper use are contrasted. Finally, a comparison is made between various types of data-collection technologies. Teachers and school staff are encouraged to not consider one as ‘superior’ to another, but rather to select carefully based on the educational needs of their students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Fitzpatrick, K., and Pershing, J. (1996). Technology: Indicators of Quality Information Technology Systems in K-12 Schools. National Study of School Evaluation, Schaumburg, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. F., Valdez, G., Nowakowski, J., and Rasmussen, C. (n.d.). Plugging In: Choosing and Using Educational Technology. Council for Educational Development and Research, Washington, DC.

  • Krajcik, J., and Layman, J. (1992). In F. Lawrenz, K. Cochrin, J. Krajcik, and P. Simpson (Eds.), Microcomputer-based laboratories in the science classroom [NARST Monograph #5]. Research Matters... to the Science Teacher. National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Manhattan, Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterman, D., and Goodman, B. (1997). “Computer vs. CBL: Two Probeware Systems Compared.” http://www.gene.com/AE/21st/TE/PW/vs.html (4 Nov. 1997).

  • National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. Gomez, L., Edelson, P. Fighman, B., Gordin, D., and O'Neill, D. (1997). Science education as driver of cyberspace technology development. In K. Cohen (Ed.), Internet Links for Science Education. Plenum Press, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology. (1997). Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. D. E. Shaw and Co, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technology for All Americans Project/International Technology Education Association. (1996). Technology for All Americans: A rationale and structure for the study of technology. Author, Reston, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kreuger, A., Rawls, G. Connecting Points: Teacher Decision-Making About Student Data-Collection Technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology 7, 279–283 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021800725768

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021800725768

Navigation