Skip to main content
Log in

Personality Vulnerability, Psychiatric Diagnoses, and Symptoms: Cluster Analyses of the Sociotropy-Autonomy Subscales

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine whether psychiatric outpatients represented distinct personality types with respect to sociotropy and autonomy, the Sociotropy and Autonomy Scale (SAS; Beck, Epstein, Harrison, & Emery, 1983) was administered to 2,067 psychiatric outpatients with predominantly DSM-III-R mood or anxiety disorders. Both agglomerative-hierarchical and nonhierarchical cluster analyses performed on the six subscales of the SAS revealed four personality types—Independence, Dependence, Individualistic Achievement and Low Scoring Controls. Loglinear analyses failed to reveal significant differences between clusters in specific Axis I diagnoses, though a significantly higher proportion of the sociotropic Dependent type had a Dependent or Avoidant personality disorder. The autonomous Independent and sociotropic Dependent clusters also had higher levels of self-reported and clinically rated depression and anxiety than did the Individualistic Achievement and Low Scoring groups. The implications of these results for understanding the relationship between personality and psychopathology are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Alloy, L. B. (1989). Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression. Psychological Review, 96, 358–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., revised). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, P. A., & Gotlib, I. H. (1988). Personality and depression: New scales and a model of relationships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Montreal.

  • Beck, A. T. (1983). Cognitive therapy of depression: New perspectives. In P. J. Clayton & J. E. Barrett (Eds.), Treatment of depression: Old controversies and new approaches. New York: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1987). Cognitive model of depression. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 1, 2–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Harrison, R. P. & Emery, G. (1983). Development of the Sociotropy-Autonomy Scale: A measure of personality factors in psychopathology. Unpublished manuscript, Center for Cognitive Therapy, University of Pennsylvania Medical School, Philadelphia.

  • Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1993a). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1993b). Manual for the Beck Anxiety Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Garbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaney, P. H., & Kutcher, G. S. (1991). Measures of depressive dimensions: Are they interchangeable? Journal of Personality Assessment, 56, 502–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgen, F. H., & Barnett, D. C. (1987). Applying cluster analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 456–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappeliez, P. (1993). The relationship between Beck's concepts of sociotropy and autonomy and the NEO-Personality Inventory. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 78–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A., & Beck, A. T. (1991). Personality factors in dysphoria: A psychometric refinement of Beck's Sociotropy-Autonomy Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 13, 369–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A., & Steer, R. A. (1996). Empirical status of the cognitive model of anxiety and depression. In: Salkovskis, P. M. (Ed.), Frontiers of cognitive therapy (pp. 75–96). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A., Steer, R. A., Beck, A. T., & Ross, L. (1995). Psychometric characteristics of revised sociotropy and autonomy scales in college students. Behavior Research and Therapy, 33, 325–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, P., & Reynolds, S. (1990). The relationship between the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire and Beck's concepts of sociotropy and autonomy. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29, 319–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J. C., & Whiffen, V. E. (1995). Issues in personality as diathesis for depression: The case of sociotropy-dependency and autonomy-self-criticism. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 358–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, W. (1976). NCDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology (DHHS Publication No. ADM 91-338). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. (1959). The assessment of anxiety states by rating. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 32, 50, 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 23, 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, N., & Beck, A. T. (1994). Subtyping major depression: A taxometric analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 686–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, J. B., Dyck, M. J., Kramer, T. A., & Wherry, J. N. (1996). The relations between sociotropy and autonomy, positive and negative affect, and two proposed depression sybtypes, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35, 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, G. W. (1980). An examination of the effects of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms. Psychometrika, 45, 325–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. G., & Blackburn, I. M. (1994). The relationship of sociotropy and autonomy to symptoms, cognition and personality in depressed patients. Journal of Affective Disorders, 32, 239–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzel, M. T., & Harris, M. J. (1990). Relationship of dependency and achievement/autonomy to depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 279–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quimette, P. C., Klein, D. N., Anderson, R., Riso, L. P., & Lizardi, H. (1994). Relationship of sociotropy/autonomy and dependency/self-criticism to DSM-III-R personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 743–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persons, J. B., Burns, D. D., Perloff, J. M., & Miranda, J. (1993). Relationships between symptoms of depression and anxiety and dysfunctional beliefs about achievement and attachment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 518–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persons, J. B., Miranda, J., & Perloff, J. M. (1991). Relationships between depressive symptoms and cognitive vulnerabilities of achievement and dependency. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 15, 221–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, C. J., & Block, P. (1988). Personal vulnerability, life events, and depressive symptoms: A test of a specific interactional model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 847–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, C. J., Block, P., & Peselow, E. D. (1989). Relation of sociotropic and autonomous personality characteristics to specific symptoms in depressed patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 86–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, C. J., Hayes, A. M., Block, P., Kramer, R. J., & Villena, M. (1995). Interpersonal and achievement concerns and depressive vulnerability and symptom specificity hypotheses: A prospective study. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, C. J., & Luten, A. G. (1991). Sociotropy and autonomy: Differential pattern of clinical presentation in unipolar depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 74–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rude, S. S., & Burnham, B. L. (1993). Do interpersonal and achievement vulnerabilities interact with congruent events to predict depression? Comparison of DEQ, SAS, and DAS, and combined scales. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 17, 531–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarle, W. S. (1983). Cubic clustering criterion, SAS Technical Report A-108. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. (1989). SAS/STAT user's guide, ver. 6, 4th ed., Vol 1. Cary, NC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Gibbon, M. & First, M. B. (1990). User's guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whisman, M. A., Miller, I. W., Norman, W. H., & Keitner, G. I. (1995). Hopelessness depression in depressed inpatients: Symptomatology, Patient characteristics, and outcome. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 377–398.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, D.A., Steer, R.A., Haslam, N. et al. Personality Vulnerability, Psychiatric Diagnoses, and Symptoms: Cluster Analyses of the Sociotropy-Autonomy Subscales. Cognitive Therapy and Research 21, 267–283 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021822431896

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021822431896

Navigation