Skip to main content
Log in

Immaculate Consumption: A Critique of the “Shop till you drop” School of Human Behavior

  • Published:
International Journal of Historical Archaeology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consumer behavior and choice models have assumed a major role in historical archaeology. Recent interest in consumption is an honest attempt to move beyond an emphasis on production. Consumer models have clear material referents, making them useful in historical archaeology. These models, however, separate production from consumption, and privilege the autonomous individual as the preferred unit of analysis. They also reinforce and validate ideologies that obscure inequalities and power relations in modern society. For us the important issue is how people reproduce themselves as social beings. Focusing on social reproduction integrates both production and consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES CITED

  • Appadurai, A. (ed.) (1986). The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. (1982). Embellishing a life of labor: An interpretation of the material culture of working-class homes, 1885–1915. In Schlereth, T. J. (ed.), Material Culture Studies in America, The American Association for State and Local History, Nashville, pp. 289–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, L. J., Yamin, R., and McCarthy, J. P. (1996). Shopping as meaningful action: Toward a redefinition of consumption in historical archaeology. Historical Archaeology 30(4): 50–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawley, A. (1976). Class and Community: The Industrial Revolution in Lynn, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. (1996). The Illusion of Postmodernism. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, T. L. (1995). (Untimely) critiques for a red feminism. In Zavarzadeh, M., Ebert, T., and Morton, D. (eds.), Post-Ality: Marxism and Postmodernism, Transformations. vol. 1. Maisonneuve Press, Washington, DC., pp. 113–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewen, S. (1976). Captains of Consciousness: Advertising and the Social Roots of Consumer Culture, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewen, S. (1988). All Consuming Images, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewen, S. and Ewen, E. (1992). Channels of Desire: Mass Images and the Shaping of American Consciousness, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, James A. (1996). The Archaeology of Wealth: Consumer Behavior in English America, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godelier, M. (1986). The Mental and the Material: Thought, Economy and Society, Verso, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, N. (1981). Gender and dichotomy. Feminist Studies 7(1): 38–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, T. H., and LeeDecker, C. H. (1991). Models for the study of consumer behavior. Historical Archaeology 25(2).

  • Kristoff, N. D. (1998). Asia feels strain most at society's margins. New York Times 147(51, 182): A1, A8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrain, J. (1995). Identity, the other, and postmodernism. In Zavarzadeh, M. U., Ebert, T. L., and Morton, D. (eds.), Post-Ality: Marxism and Postmodernism, Transformations. vol. 1. Maisonneuve Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 271–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. (1988). Culture and Consumption, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, R. H. (1991). Building power in the cultural landscape of Broome County, New York 1880–1940. In McGuire, R. H., and Paynter, R. (eds.), The Archaeology of Inequality, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 102–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKendrick, N. (1982). Josiah Wedgewood and the commercialization of potteries. In McKendrick, N., Brewer, J., and Plumb, J. H. (eds.), The Birth of a Consumer Society: The Commercialization of the Eighteenth Century, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 100–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1987). Material Culture and Mass Consumption, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1995). Consumption and commodities. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 141–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (ed.) (1996). Acknowledging Consumption: A Review of New Studies, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukerji, C. (1983). From Graven Images: Patterns of Modern Materialism, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Wood, S. M. (ed.) (1987). Consumer Choice in Historical Archaeology, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class, George Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavarzadeh, M. U. (1995). Post-ality: The (dis)simulations of cybercapitalism. In Zavarzadeh, M. U., Ebert, T. L., and Morton, D. (eds.), Post-Ality: Marxism and Postmodernism, Transformations. vol. 1. Maisonneuve Press, Washington, DC., pp. 1–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wurst, L., McGuire, R.H. Immaculate Consumption: A Critique of the “Shop till you drop” School of Human Behavior. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 3, 191–199 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021914220703

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021914220703

Navigation