Skip to main content
Log in

Geometric Simultaneity and the Continuity of Special Relativity

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Letters

Abstract

In this note I briefly discuss some aspects of relative geometric simultaneity in special relativity. After saying a few words about the status and nature of Minkowski spacetime in special relativity, I recall a uniqueness result due to David Malament concerning simultaneity relative to an inertial worldline and an extension of it due to Mark Hogarth and I prove an extension of it for simultaneity relative to an inertial frame in time-oriented spacetimes. Then I point out that the uniqueness results do not generalise to definitions of simultaneity relative to the rotating disk. Finally, I evaluate some recent claims of Selleri in the light of the results. Whilst some of his claims are supported by the approach taken here, the conclusion he draws from these claims, that special relativity harbours a discontinuity and so stands in need of replacement, does not follow and is rejected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Budden, T. (1997a), “A star in the Minkowskian sky: Anisotropic special relativity,” Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 28(3), 325–361.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Budden, T. (1997b), “Galileo's ship and spacetime symmetry,” Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 48, 483–516.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Budden, T. (1997c), “Numbers and locality,” preprint.

  4. Earman, J. (1989), World Enough and Space-Time (MIT Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Field, H. (1980), Science Without Numbers (Blackwell, Oxford).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Hogarth, M. (1993), “Standard simultaneity is unique in metrical Minkowski spacetime: A generalisation of Malament's theorem,” unpublished manuscript.

  7. Malament, D. (1975), “Does the Causal Structure of Space-Time Determine its Geometry?,” Ph.D. thesis, Rockefeller University.

  8. Malament, D. (1977), “Causal theories of time and the conventionality of simultaneity,” Noûs 11, 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Norton, J. (1984), “What was Einstein's principle of equivalence?,” Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci 16(3), 203–246.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Robb, A. A. (1914), A Theory of Space and Time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Selleri, F. (1997), “Noninvariant one-way speed of light and locally equivalent reference frames,” Found. Phys. Lett. 10(1), 73–83.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Spirtes, P. (1981), “Conventionalism in the Philosophy of Henri Poincará,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Pittsburgh.

  13. Stein, H. (1991), “On relativity theory and openness of the future,” Phil. Sci. 58, 147–167.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Winnie, J. (1977), “The causal theory of space-time,” in J. Earman, ed., Foundations of Space-Time Theories (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. VIII) (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis), pp. 134–205.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Budden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Budden, T. Geometric Simultaneity and the Continuity of Special Relativity. Found Phys Lett 11, 343–357 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022176907790

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022176907790

Navigation