Abstract
We evaluated eight synthetic predator odors and mongoose (Herpestes auropunctatus) feces for eliciting avoidance responses and/or reduced feeding by wild captured Hawaiian roof rats (Rattus rattus). In a bioassay arena, we recorded: (1) time until each rat entered the arena, (2) time elapsed until first eating bout, (3) time spent in each half of the arena, (4) number of eating bouts, and (5) consumption. Rats displayed a response to the predator odors in terms of increased elapsed time before initial arena entry and initial eating bout, a lower number of eating bouts, and less food consumption than in the respective control groups. The odor that produced the greatest differences in response relative to the control group was 3,3-dimethyl-1,2-dithiolane [from red fox (Vulpes vulpes) feces and mustelid anal scent gland]. Mongoose fecal odor produced different responses in four of the five variables measured while (E,Z)-2,4,5-trimethyl-Δ3-thiazoIine (red fox feces) and 4-mercapto-4-methylpentan-2-one (red fox urine and feces) odors were different from the control group in three of the five variables measured. These laboratory responses suggest that wild Hawaiian roof rats avoid predator odors.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Boag, B., and Mlotkiewicz, J. A. 1994. Effect of odor derived from lion feces on behavior of wild rabbits. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:631–637.
Calder, C. J., and Gorman, M. L. 1991. The effect of red fox, Vulpes vulpes, faecal odors on the feeding behaviour of Orkney voles Microtus arvalis. J. Zool. London 224:599–606.
Cattarelli, M., and Chanel, J. 1979. Influence of some biological meaningful odorants on the vigilance states of the rat. Physiol. Behav. 23:831–838.
Chance, M. R. A., and Mmead, A. P. 1995. Competition between feeding and investigation in the rat. Behavior 8:174–182.
Engeman, R. M., and Pank, L. F. 1984. Potential secondary toxicity from anticoagulant pesticides contaminating human food sources. N. Engl. J. Med. 311:257–258.
Epple, G. J., Mason, R., Nolte, D. L., and Campbell, D. L. 1993. Effects of predator odors on feeding in the mountain beaver (Aplodontia rufa). J. Mammal. 74:715–722.
Ewer, R. F. 1971. The biology and behaviour of a free-living population of black rats (Rattus rattus). Anim. Behav. Monogr. 4:127–174.
Gorman, M. L. 1984. The response of prey to stoat (Mustela erminea) scent. J. Zool. London 202:419–423.
Heale, V. R., and Vanderwolf, C. H. 1994. Toluene and weasel (2-propylthietane) odors suppress feeding in the rat. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:2953–2958.
Jedrzejewski, W., Rychlik, L., and Jedrzejewska, B. 1993. Responses of bank voles to odors of seven species of predators: Experimental data and their relevance to natural predator-vole relationships. Oikos 68:251–257.
SAS Institute Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 6.03. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
Sugihara, R. T., Tobin, M. E., and Koehler, A. E. 1995. Zinc phosphide baits and prebaiting for controlling rats in Hawaiian sugarcane. J. Wildl. Manage. 59:882–889.
Sullivan, T. P., and Crump, D. R. 1986. Avoidance response of pocket gophers (Thomomys talpoides) to mustelid anal gland compounds, pp. 519–531, in D. Duvall, D. Müller-Schwarze, and R. M. Silverstein (eds.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates IV. Plenum Press, New York.
Sullivan, T. P., Crump, D. R., and Sullivan, D. S. 1988a. The use of predator odor repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores. III. Montane (Microtus montanus) and meadow (M. pennsylvanicus) voles. J. Chem. Ecol. 14:363–377.
Sullivan, T. P., Crump, D. R., and Sullivan, D. S. 1988b. The use of predator odor repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores. IV. Northern pocket gophers (Thomomys talpoides). J. Chem. Ecol. 14:379–389.
Sullivan, T. P., Sullivan, D. S., Crump, D. R., WEISER, H., and Dixon, E. A. 1988c. Predator odors and their potential role in managing pest rodents and rabbits, pp. 145–150, in J. E. Borrecco and R. E. Marsh (eds.). Proceedings, 15th Vertebrate Pest Conference. University of California, Davis.
Tobin, M. E. 1992. Rodent damage in Hawaiian macadamia orchards, pp. 272–276, in J. E. Borrecco and R. E. Marsh (eds.). Proceedings, 15th Vertebrate Pest Conference, University of California, Davis.
Tobin, M. E., Sugihara, R. T., and Ota, A. K. 1990. Rodent damage to Hawaiian sugarcane. pp. 120–123, in L. R. Davis and R. E. Marsh (eds.). Proceedings, 14th Vertebrate Pest Conference University of California, Davis.
Tobin, M. E., KOEHLER, A. E., SUGIHARA, R. T., UEUNTEN, G., and Yamaguchi, A. M. 1993. Effects of trapping on rat populations and subsequent damage and yields of macadamia nuts. Crop Prot. 12:243–248.
Tobin, M. E., Engeman, R. M., and Sugihara, R. T. 1995. Effects of mongoose odors on rat capture success. J. Chem. Ecol. 21(5):635–639.
Tobin, M. E., Koehler, A. E., Sugihara, R. T., and Burwash, M. D. 1997. Repellency of mongoose feces and urine to rats (Rattus spp.). In R. Mason and D. Nolte (eds.). Proceedings of the Repellents Symposium. National Wildlife Research Center, USDA-APHIS, Denver, Colorado. In press.
Vernet-Maury, E., Polak, E. H., and Demael, A. 1984. Structure-activity relationship of stress-inducing odorants in the rat. J. Chem. Ecol. 10:1007–1018.
Vernet-Maury, E., Constant, B., and Chanel, J. 1992. Repellent effect of trimethyl thiazoline in the wild rat Rattus norvegicus Berkenhout, pp. 305–310, in R. L. Doty and D. Muller-Schwarze (eds.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates VI. Plenum Press, New York.
Von Ende, C. N. 1993. Repeated-measures analysis: Growth and other time-dependent measures, pp. 113–137, in S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch (eds.). Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York.
Xu, Z., Stoddart, D. M., Ding, H., and Zhang, J. 1995. Self-anointing behavior in the rice-field rat, Rattus rattoides. J. Mammal. 76:1238–1241.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burwash, M.D., Tobin, M.E., Woolhouse, A.D. et al. Laboratory Evaluation of Predator Odors for Eliciting an Avoidance Response in Roof Rats (Rattus rattus). J Chem Ecol 24, 49–66 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022384728170
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022384728170