Skip to main content
Log in

The engineer's dilemma: A sociological perspective on juridificaton and regulation

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Juridification refers to the tendency fororganisations and individuals subject toregulation to be overwhelmed by detailedrules, standards and instructions. Manyresearchers have argued that suchover-prescriptiveness can in fact underminethe likelihood that a business orindividual will comply. Though proceedingfrom different theoretical perspectives,writers such as Braithwaite, Teubner andPatterson all argue that juridification canbe minimised by improving regulatorystrategies and techniques. Instead of beingrule bound and relying on detailedprescriptions, authorities should becomemore flexible and outcome-oriented. Thispaper uses the case-study of a ChiefEngineer in an Australian public hospitalto contest the view that juridification canbe reduced simply by improving regulatorytechniques. Drawing on Habermas, it arguesthat juridification is the product ofdeep-seated crisis tendencies in latemodern capitalist democracies. Fiscal andlegitimacy problems are causing governmentsand regulatory authorities to pressure theengineer to try to satisfy contradictorydemands. Simultaneously he must be acost-conscious entrepreneurial risk-managerwhile not losing sight of his role as arisk-averse maintainer of professionalstandards. The plethora of rules andregulatory standards which surround theengineer reflect government desire todistance itself in the event that economicpressures cause him to incur risks that thepublic and media deem unacceptable.Ultimately, therefore, the engineer'sjuridification problems have a politicaldimension. To the extent that they helpobscure this, theories that suggestjuridification can be solved by improvingregulatory techniques have an ideologicalfunction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayres, I. and B. Braithwaite, Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. and M. Cave, Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierig, J., “Whatever Happened to Professional Self'Regulation, ” American Bar Association Journal May 1983 (69), 616'619, May.

  • Braithwaite, J. and T. Makkai, “Trust and Compliance, ” Policing and Society 1994 (4), 1'12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockman, J., “ 'Fortunate Enough to Obtain and Keep the Title of Profession': Selfregulating organizations and the enforcement of professional monopolies, ” Canadian Public Administration 1997 (40:4), 587'621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. and G. Tullock, The Calculus Of Consent, Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M., The Power of Identity (Massachusetts: Blackwell, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coady, M. and S. Bloch, “Introduction, ” inM. Coady and S. Bloch (eds.), Codes of Ethics and the Professions (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1996) pp. 1'10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffee, J., “No Soul to Damn: No Body to Kick: An Unscandalized Inquiry into the Problem of Corporate Punishment,” Michigan Law Review 1981 (79), 396'459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crimes (Industrial Manslaughter) Bill, (Vic) 2000.

  • Deflam, M. (ed.), Habermas, Modernity and the Law (London: Sage, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deighton'Smith, R., B. Harris and K. Pearson, Reforming the Regulation of Prisons, National Competition Council, Staff Discussion Paper, 2001 www.ncc.gov.au/nationalcompet/Community%20Info%Papers/Staff%20Discussion%20Papers/Reforming%20the%20regulation%20of%20professions.pdf accessed January 17, 2002.

  • Douglas, M., “Risk and Danger, ” in Risk and Blame, Essays in Cultural Theory (London: Routledge, 1994) pp. 38'54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E., The Division of Labor in Society (New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1964 [first published 1893]).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, P., Sociology of the Professions (London: Macmillan, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A., “The Modern State, ” in Sociology: A Brief but Critical Introduction Second Edition, (London: MacMillan, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N. and P. Grabosky, Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy (Clarendon: Oxford University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., Legitimation Crisis (London: Heinemann, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., “The Uncoupling of the System and the Lifeworld” in S. Seidman (ed.), Jurgen Habermas on Society and Politics: A Reader (Boston: Beacon Press, 1989) pp. 188'236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, F., “Innocent Deaths and Regulatory Failure: A Case Study of Change in the Absence of Punishment, ” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 1999 (27), 23'50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, F. and A. Sutton, “Crime Prevention and White'Collar Crime: Some Lessons for Regulatory Theory, ” in P. O'Malley and A. Sutton (eds.), Crime Prevention in Australia (Sydney: The Federation Press, 1997) pp. 138'163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halmos, P. (ed.), Professionalisation and Social Change (Keele: University of Keele, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D., The Condition of Postmodernity (Cambridge MA: Blackwell, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilmer, F.G., See Independent Committee of Enquiry, 1993.

  • Independent Committee of Inquiry, National Competition Policy, Report to Australian Governments, Chairman: Professor F.G. Hilmer, Canberra, AGPS, February, 1993.

  • Jamrozik, A., Class, Inequality and the State (South Melbourne: MacMillan Australia, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T.J., Professions and Power (London: Macmillan, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolko, G., The Triumph of Conservatism (New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolko, G., Railroads and Regulation (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N., Social Systems (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCluskey, M., “The Illusions of Efficiency in Workers' Compensation 'Reform', ” Rutgers Law Review 1998 (50:3), 657'941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvel, H.P., “Factory Regulation: A Reinterpretation of Early English Experience” The Journal of Law and Economics 1977 (20), 379'402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., Capital, vol 1, (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. Wright, The Sociological Imagination (London: Penguin, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nariai, O., “Japan's Economy in 2002, ” Japan Economic Update: Trends and Analysis from Japan's Periodicals, 2002. http://www.japanecho.com/jeu/news.html. Accessed January 16, 2002.

  • Offe, C., Contradictions of the Welfare State (Cambridge Mass: MIT Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C., Disorganized Capitalism (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Regulation Reform (Undated) see State Government of Victoria.

  • Osborne, D. and T. Gaebler, Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector (Mass: Addison Wesley, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Passas, N. and D. Nelken, “The Thin Line Between Legitimate and Criminal Enterprises: Subsidy Frauds in the European Community, ” Crime, Law and Social Change 1993 (19), 223'243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, J., Behind the Mask: Regulating Health and Safety in Britain's Offshore Oil and Gas Industry (Aldershot: Ashgate Dartmouth, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paxinos, S., “Unsafe Ansett Plane flew 8 Trips, ” The Age Saturday November 12, 2001.

  • Sitkin, S.B. and J.B. Beis (eds.), The Legalistic Organization (London: Sage, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., The Wealth of Nations (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970 [1776]).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., “The Development of Ethical Guidance for Medical Practitioners by the General Medical Council, ” Medical History 1993 (37), 56'67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, G., “Juridification: Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions, ” in R. Baldwin, C. Scott and C. Hood (eds.), A Reader on Regulation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D., Controlling Unlawful Organizational Behaviour (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M., (a) edited by H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (London: Routledge, 1991 first published in England in 1948).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M., (b) “Politics as a Vocation” H. Gerth and C. WrightMills (eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (London: Routledge, 1991 first published in England in 1948), pp. 77'128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, A., “Lessons from Accidents: Don't Cut Down on Engineering Expertise, ” Engineers Australia 2000 (72:1). http://www.engaust.com/au/magazines/ea/0100coverstory.html accessed January 17, 2002.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haines, F., Sutton, A. The engineer's dilemma: A sociological perspective on juridificaton and regulation. Crime, Law and Social Change 39, 1–22 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022499020874

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022499020874

Keywords

Navigation