Skip to main content
Log in

Individual and Sociocultural Views of Learning in Science Education

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we consider how theories of learning can inform the practice of scienceteaching in formal settings. We describe two broad strands of learning theory that havebeen drawn upon in science education, namely individual and sociocultural views. Weshow how aspects of both views can usefully inform our understanding of teaching andlearning science in formal settings. A perspective on science learning in formal settingsis presented which draws on and develops features of both individual and socioculturalviews, and the implications of this perspective on science learning for research and practice are discussed. The paper concludes with reflections on some of the recent critiques of so-called `constructivist views of learning' in the light of the perspective developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adey, P. & Shayer, M.: 1993, Really Raising Standards, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M.: 1981, The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin (ed.), Michael Holquist, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse, N. W. & Stanley, W. B.: 1999, ‘Interpreting Constructions of Constructivism’, Studies in Science Education 33, 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.: 1992, ‘Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions’, Journal of the Learning Sciences 2(2), 141–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J.: 1985, ‘Vygotsky: A Historical and Conceptual Perspective’, in J. Wertsch (ed.), Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, England, pp. 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S.: 1985, Conceptual Change in Childhood, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevellard, Y.: 1991, La Transposition Didactique (second edition), La Pensée Sauvage, Grenoble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H.: 1992, ‘Conceptual ChangeWithin and Across Ontological Categories: Examples from Learning and Discovery in Science’, in R. Giere (ed.), Cognitive Models of Science: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Scienc, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M., Slotta, J.& DeLeeuw, N.: 1994, ‘FromThings to Processes: A Theory of Conceptual Change for Learning Science Concepts’, Learning and Instruction 4, 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P. & Bowers, J.: 1999, ‘Cognitive and Situational Perspectives in Theory and Practice’, Educational Researcher 28(2), 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Perlwitz, N. & Underwood-Gregg, D.: 1998, ‘Individual Construction, Mathematical Acculturation, and the Classroom Community’, in M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz & J. Garrison, Construction in Education, Cambridge University Press, 1998, 63–81.

  • diSessa, A.: 1988, ‘Knowledge-in-Pieces’, in G. Forman & P.B. Pufall (eds.), Constructivism in the Computer Age 49-70, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. & Sherin: 1998, ‘What Changes in Conceptual Change?’, International Journal of Science Education 20(10), 1155–1191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R.: 1997, ‘The Application of Science Education Theories: A Reply to Stephen P. Norris and Tone Kvernbekk’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34(10), 1007–1018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E.& Scott, P.: 1994a, ‘Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom’, Educational Researcher 23(7), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R. & Scott, P.: 1996, Young Peoples' Images of Science, Open University Press.

  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Scott, P. & Wood-Robinson, C.: 1994b, ‘Young People's Understanding of Science Concepts: Implications of Cross-Age Studies for Curriculum Planning’, Studies in Science Education 24, 75–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R. & Treagust, D.: 1998, ‘Learning in Science: From Behaviourism to Social Constructivism and Beyond’, in B. Fraser & K. Tobin (eds.), International Handbook of Science Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. & Mercer, N.M.: 1987, Common Knowledge: The Development of Understanding in the Classroom, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R.: 1988, Varieties of Realism, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harr#x00E9;, R. & Gillett, G.: 1994, The Discursive Mind, Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hestenes, D., Wells, M. & Swackhamer, G.: 1992, ‘Force Concept Inventory’, Physics Teacher 30, 141–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holquist, M. & Emerson, C.: 1981, Glossary for The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M.Bakhtin (ed.), M. Holquist. trans. M. Holquist and Caryl Emerson, University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., Amsel, E. & O'Loughlin, M.: 1988, The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills, Academic Press.

  • Leach, J., Driver, R., Scott, P. & Wood-Robinson, C.: 1996, ‘Children's Ideas about Ecology 3: Ideas about the Cycling of Matter found in Children aged 5-16’, International Journal of Science Education 18(2), 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, J. & Scott, P.: 1995, ‘The Demands of Learning Science Concepts: Issues of Theory and Practice’, School Science Review 76(277), 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, J. & Scott, P.: (in press), ‘Designing and Evaluating Science Teaching Seaquences: An Approach Drawing on the Concept of Learning Demand and a Social Constructivist-Perspective on Learning’, Studies in Science Education.

  • Lemke, J.L.: 1990, Talking Science: Language, Learning and Values, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, A.N.: 1981, ‘The Problem of Activity in Psychology’, in J.V. Wertsch (ed.), The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology, Sharpe, Armonk, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijnse, P.L.: 1995, ‘ “Developmental Research” as a Way to an Empirically Based “Didactical Structure' of Science” ’, Science Education 97(2), 189–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijnse, P.L.: 2000, ‘Didactics of Science: The Forgotten Dimension in Science Education Research?’, in R. Millar, J. Leach & J. Osborne (eds.), Improving Science Education: The Contribution of Research, Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.: 1992, ‘Constructivism and Empiricism: An Incomplete Divorce’, Research in Science Education 22, 299–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.: 1994, ‘Discontent with Constructivism’, Studies in Science Education 24, 165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.: 1997, ‘Introductory Comments on Philosophy and Constructivism in Science Education’, Science and Education 6, 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.: 2000, ‘Editorial’, Science and Education 9, 491–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Méheut, M.: 1998, ‘Construire et Valider des Sequences d'Enseignement sur le Théme de la Modélisation de Transformations Physiques et Chimiques par des Élèves de Collèges Français: Note de Synthése pourl'Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches en Didactique des Sciences Physiques’, LDPES, Université Denis Diderot-Paris 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, K.: 1995, ‘Reassessment of Developmental Constraints on Children's Science Instruction’, Review of Educational Research 65, 93–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, K.: 1997, ‘On the Complex Relation Between Cognitive Development Research and Children's Science Curricula’, Review of Educational Research 67, 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R.: 1989, ‘Constructive Criticisms’, International Journal of Science Education, Special Edition 11(5), 587–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, E.F. & Scott, P.H.: 2000, ‘Analysing Discourse in the Science Classroom’, in R. Millar, J. Leach & J. Osborne (eds.), Improving Science Education: The Contribution of Research, Open University Press, Buckingham, pp. 126–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nola, R.: 1997, ‘Constructivism in Science and Science Education: A Philosophical Critique’, Science and Education 6, 55–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. & Kvernbekk, T.: 1997, ‘The Application of Science Education Theories’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34(10), 977–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogborn, J., Kress, G., Martins, I. & McGillicuddy, K.: 1996, Explaining Science in the Classroom, Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petri, J. & Niedderer, H.: 1998, ‘A Learning Pathway in High School Level Quantum Atomic Physics’, International Journal of Science Education 20(9), 1075–1088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfundt, H. & Duit, R.: 1994, Bibliography: Students' Alternative Frameworks and Science Education (fourth edition), IPN, Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. C. (2000). Constructivism in Education, National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1937, La construction du réel chez l'enfant, Neuchâtel, Switzerland: Delachaux et Niestlé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W. & Gertzog, W.A.: 1982, ‘Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change’, Science Education 66(2), 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W-M.: 1998, ‘Learning Process Studies: Examples From Physics’, International Journal of Science Education 20(9), 1019–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savinainen, A. & Scott, P.: 2002, ‘The Force Concept Inventory: A Tool for Monitoring Student Learning’, Physics Education 37(1), 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoultz, J., Säljö, R. & Wyndhamn, J.: (2001), ‘Heavenly Talk. Discourse, Artifacts and Children's Understanding of Elementary Astronomy’, Human Development 44, 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P.H.: 1996, ‘Social Interactions and Personal Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms’, in G. Welford, J. Osborne, P. Scott (eds.), Research in Science Education in Europe, Falmer Press, London, pp. 325–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P.H.: 1997a, Developing Science Concepts in Secondary Classrooms: An Analysis of Pedagogical Interactions from a Vygotskian Perspective, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Leeds, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P.H.: 1997b, ‘Teaching and Learning Science Concepts in the Classroom: Talking a Path from Spontaneous to Scientific Knowledge’, Paper presented at an international seminar held at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, March 1997.

  • Scott, P.H.: 1998, ‘Teacher Talk and Meaning Making in Science Classrooms: A Vygotskian Analysis and Review’, Studies in Science Education 32, 45–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J.: 1983, Teaching Children in the Laboratory, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J.: 1994, ‘The Rise and Fall of Constructivism’, Studies in Science Education 23, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchting, W.A.: 1992, ‘Constructivism Deconstructed’, Science and Education 1, 223–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, C.: 1996, ‘The Scientific Model as a Form of Speech’, in G. Welford, J. Osborne & P. Scott (eds.), Research in Science Education in Europe, The Falmer Press, London, pp. 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberghien, A.: 1996, ‘Construction of Prototypical Situations in Teaching the Concept of Energy’, in G. Welford, J. Osborne & P. Scott (eds.), Research in Science Education in Europe: Current Issues and Themes.

  • Tiberghien, A.: 2000, ‘Designing Teaching Situations in the Secondary School’, in R. Millar, J.Leach & J. Osborne (eds.), Improving Science Education: The Contribution of Research, Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viennot, L. & Rainson, S.: 1999, ‘Design and Evaluation of a Research Based Teaching Sequence: The Superposition of Electric Fields’, International Journal of Science Education 21(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Aufschnaiter, C., Schoster, A. & von Aufschnaiter, S.: 1999, ‘The Influence of Student's Individual Experiences of Physics Learning Environments on Cognitive Processes’, in J. Leach & A. Paulsen (eds.), Practical Work in Science Education: Recent Research Studies.

  • von Glasersfeld, E.: 1999, ‘How Do We Mean? A Constructivist Sketch of Semantics’, Cybernetics & Human Learning 6(1), 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S.: 1994, ‘Capturing and Modelling the Process of Conceptual Change’, Learning and Instruction 4, 45–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W.F.: 1992, ‘Mental Models of Earth: A Study of Conceptual Change in Childhood’, Cognitive Psychology 24, 535–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. & Ioannides, C.: 1998, ‘From Conceptual Development to Science Education: A Theoretical Point of View’, International Journal of Science Education 20(10), 1213–1230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S.: 1978, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S.: 1987, The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky, Volume 1, R.W. Rieber & A.S. Carton (eds.), N. Minick (trans.), Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J.V.: 1991, Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action, Harvester Wheatsheaf.

  • Wertsch, J.V.: 1998, Mind as Action, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1972, Philosophical Investigations, trans. G.E.M. Anscombe, Blackwell and Mott, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leach, J., Scott, P. Individual and Sociocultural Views of Learning in Science Education. Science & Education 12, 91–113 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022665519862

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022665519862

Keywords

Navigation