Abstract
The present study argues for a standard conceptualization of prevalence and incidence in family violence research. Reviewing several definitions of both prevalence and incidence in the family violence literature, we identify important inconsistencies in conceptualizations. The use of time frame to distinguish incidence and prevalence seems to have been a main thrust of the conceptual confusion. A “gold standard” conceptualization is proposed that sees prevalence as the extent to which violent behavior is distributed in the population and incidence as the amount of violent behavior that occurs among those in the population who experience violence. A discussion of rates calculated with other conceptualizations illustrates the need for standardization as well as the utility of the conceptualization in the present study. The calculation of prevalence and incidence rates is exemplified with respect to interpartner violence using Statistics Canada's Violence Against Women Survey (VAWS). Using duration as an independent variable, we also illustrate how the choice of “incidence” or “prevalence” rates may affect the operation of risk markers. Given the need for standardization, the relative ease with which this can be accomplished, and the knowledge that research in this area will be conducted well into the future, we conclude with a plea for a standard use of prevalence and incidence among family violence scholars.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aldarondo, E. (1996). Cessation and persistence of wife assault: A longitudinal analysis Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 66: 141–151.
Barnett, O. W., Miller-Perrin, C. L., and Perrin, R. D. (1997). Family Violence Across the Lifespan: An Introduction, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Brinkerhoff, M. B., and Lupri, E. (1988). Interspousal violence Can. J. Sociol. 13: 407–434.
DeKeseredy, W., and Kelly, K. (1993). Woman abuse in university and college dating relationships: The contribution of the ideology of familial patriarchy J. Hum. Just. 4: 25–52.
Dobash, R. P., and Dobash, R. E. (1995). Reflections on findings from the violence against women survey. Can. J. Crim. 37: 457–484.
Fekete, J. (1994). Moral Panic: Biopolitics Rising, Robert Davies, Montreal.
Grandin, E., and Lupri, E. (1997). Intimate violence in Canada and the United States: A cross-national comparison. J. Family Viol. 12: 417–443.
Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G. T., and Rice, M. E. (1998). On the validity of self-reported rates of interpersonal violence. J. Interpers. Viol. 13: 58–72.
Hornung, C. A., McCullough, B. C., and Sugimoto, T. (1981). Status relationships in marriage: Risk factors in spouse abuse. J. Marriage Family 43: 675–692.
Hotaling, G. T., and Sugarman, D. B. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge. Viol. Vict. 1: 101–124.
Johnson, H. (1995). Seriousness, type and frequency of violence against wives. In Valverde, M., MacLeod, L., and Johnson, K. (eds.), Wife Assault and the Canadian Criminal Justice System, Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto, Toronto, pp. 125–147.
Johnson, H. (1996). Dangerous Domains: Violence Against Women in Canada, Nelson Canada, Scarborough.
Johnson, H., and Sacco, V. F. (1995). Researching violence against women: statistics canada's national survey. Can. J. Crim. 37: 281–304.
Koss, M. P. (1992). The underdetection of rape: Methodological choices influence incidence estimates. J. Soc. Issues 48: 61–75.
Lupri, E., Grandin, E., and Brinkerhoff, M. B. (1994). Socioeconomic status and male violence in the canadian home: A reexamination. Can. J. Sociol. 19: 47–73.
Magdol, L., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., and Silva, P. A. (1998). Hitting without a license: Testing explanations for differences in partner abuse between young adult daters and cohabitors. J. Marriage Family 60: 41–55.
Pagelow, M. D. (1985). The “battered husband syndrome”: Social problem or much ado about little? In Johnson, N (ed.), Marital Violence, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 172–195.
Rodgers, K. (1994). Wife assault in Canada. Can. Soc. Trends Autumn: 3–8.
Rosenbaum, A. (1988). Methodological issues in marital violence research. J. Family Viol. 3: 91–104.
Schulman, M. A. (1981). A Survey of Spousal Violence Against Women in Kentucky, Garland, New York.
Sessar, K. (1990). The forgotten nonvictim. Int. Rev. Victim. 1: 113–132.
Smith, M. D. (1987). The incidence and prevalence of woman abuse in Toronto. Viol. Vict. 2: 173–187.
Smith, M. D. (1994). Enhancing the quality of survey data on violence against women: A feminist approach. Gender Soc. 8: 109–127.
Sommer, R. (1994). Male and Female Perpetrated Partner Abuse: Testing a Diathesis-Stress Model, Doctoral thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.
Statistics Canada (1993). The violence against women survey. The Daily Nov. 18: 1–9.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (ct) scales. J. Marriage Family 41: 75–88.
Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. J. Marriage Family 48: 465–479.
Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Anchor/Doubleday, Garden City, NY.
Suitor, J. J., Pillemer, K., and Straus, M. A. (1990). Marital violence in a life course perspective. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (eds.), Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 305–317.
Verburg, P. (1993). Is it statcan—or propcan? Alb. Rep. 20: 36–39.
Wilson, M., Johnson, H., and Daly, M. (1995). Lethal and nonlethal violence against wives. Can. J. Crim. 37: 331–361.
Yllö, K., and Straus, M. A. (1981). Interpersonal violence among married and cohabiting couples. Family Relat. 30: 339–347.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brownridge, D.A., Halli, S.S. Measuring Family Violence: The Conceptualization and Utilization of Prevalence and Incidence Rates. Journal of Family Violence 14, 333–350 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022897130702
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022897130702