Skip to main content
Log in

Innateness and the Brain

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The philosophical innateness debate has long relied onpsychological evidence. For a century, however, a parallel debate hastaken place within neuroscience. In this paper, I consider theimplications of this neuroscience debate for the philosophicalinnateness debate. By combining the tools of theoretical neurobiologyand learning theory, I introduce the ``problem of development'' that alladaptive systems must solve, and suggest how responses to this problemcan demarcate a number of innateness proposals. From this perspective, Isuggest that the majority of natural systems are in fact innate. Lastly,I consider the acquistion strategies implemented by the human brain andsuggest that there is a rigorous way of characterizing these ``neuralconstructivist'' strategies as not being strongly innate. Alternatives toinnateness are thus both rigorously definable and empirically supported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balaban, E.: 1997, ‘Changes in Multiple Brain Regions Underlie Species Differences in a Complex, Congenital Behavior’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94, 2001-2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, A.R.: 1994, ‘Approximation and Estimation Bounds for Artificial Neural Networks’, Machine Learning 14, 115-133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, E.B. and Haussler, D.: 1989, ‘What Size Net Gives Valid Generalization?’ Neural Computation 1, 151-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A. and Rivest, R.L.: 1988, ‘Training a 3-node Neural Network is NP-complete’, in D.S. Touretzky (ed.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Morgan Kaufmann.

  • Blumer, A., Ehrenfeucht, A., Haussler, D. and Warmuth, M.: 1988, Learnability and the Vapnik-Chervonenkis Dimension. UCSC-CRL-87-20.

  • Branke, J.: 2001, Evolutionary Optimization in Dynamic Environments, Kluwer, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.: 1973, A First Language: The Early Stages, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C. and Weliky, M.: 2001, ‘Spontaneous Activity in Developing Ferret Visual Cortex in vivo’, Journal of Neuroscience 21: 8906-8914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1980, ‘Rules and Representations’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 1-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.S. and Sejnowski, T.J.: 1992, The Computational Brain, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L.G., Celnik, P., Pascual-Leone, A., Corwell, B., Falz, L., Dambrosia, J., Honda, M., Sadato, N., Gerloff, C., Catalá, M.D. and Hallett, M.: 1997, ‘Functional Relevance of Cross-modal Plasticity in Blind Humans’, Nature 389, 180-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, F.: 1999, What's Within?: Nativism Reconsidered, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crair, M.C.: 1999, ‘Neuronal Activity during Development: Permissive or Instructive?’ Current Opinion in Neurobiology 9(1), 88-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristianini, N. and Shawe-Taylor, J.: 2000, An Introduction to Support Vector Machines: and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayan, P. and Abbott, L.F.: 2001, Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietterich, T.G.: 1990, ‘Machine Learning’, Annual Review of Computer Science 4, 255-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, A.F.: 1998, Primate Sexuality: Comparative Studies of the Prosimians, Monkeys, Apes, and Human Beings, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchaine, B., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J.: 2001, ‘Evolutionary Psychology and the Brain’, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 11, 225-230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman, J.L., Bates, E.A., Johnson, M.H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D. and Plunkett, K.: 1996, Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engert, F. and Bonhoeffer, T.: 1999, ‘Dendritic Spine Changes Associated with Hippocampal Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity’, Nature 399, 66-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A.: 1975, The Language of Thought, Crowell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A.: online, ‘Doing Without What's Within’, http://host.uniroma3.it/progetti/kant/field/cowiesymp.htm

  • Fodor, J.A., Bever, T.G. and Garrett, M.F.: 1974, The Psychology of Language, McGraw Hill, York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman, S., Bienenstock, E. and Doursat, R.: 1992, ‘Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma’, Neural Computation 4, 1-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghysen, A. and Dambly-Chaudiere, C.: 2000, ‘A Genetic Programme for Neuronal Connectivity’, Trends in Genetics 16, 221-226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, E.M.: 1967, ‘Language Identification in the Limit’, Information and Control 10, 447-474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haussler, D.: 1989, ‘Quantifying Inductive Bias: AI Learning Algorithms and Valiant's Learning Framework’, Artificial Intelligence 36, 177-222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haykin, S.: 1999, Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D.O.: 1949, The Organization of Behavior; a Neuropsychological Theory, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, K.J., Molnár, Z., Van Dellen, A., Kahn, D.M., Blakemore, C. and Krubitzer, L.: 1999, ‘Formation of Cortical Fields on a Reduced Cortical Sheet’, Journal of Neuroscience 19, 9939-9952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, S.: 1988, ‘On the Complexity of Loading Shallow Neural Networks’, Journal of Complexity 4, 177-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karten, H. (ed.): 2000, Evolutionary Developmental Biology of the Cerebral Cortex, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L.C. and Crowley, J.C.: 2002, ‘Development of Cortical Circuits: Lessons from Ocular Dominance Columns’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3, 34-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh, D.: 1992, ‘PDP Learnability and Innate Knowledge of Language’, in S. Davis (ed.), Connectionism: Theory and Practice (Volume III of The Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, pp. 297–322), Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, C.: 1999, Biophysics of Computation: Information Processing in Single Neurons, Oxford, New York.

  • Koza, J.: 1992, Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenneberg, E.H.: 1967, Biological Foundations of Language, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maletic-Savatic, M., Malinow, R. and Svoboda, K.: 1999, ‘Rapid Dendritic Morphogenesis in CA1 Hippocampal Dendrites Induced by Synaptic Activity’, Science 283, 1923-1927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D.: 1982, Vision, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, D.D. and Nakagawa, Y.: 2002, ‘Patterning Centers, Regulatory Genes and Extrinsic Mechanisms Controlling Arealization of the Neocortex’, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 12, 14-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallas, S.L.: 2001, ‘Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors that Shape Neocortical Specification’, Trends in Neurosciences 24(7), 417-423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piatelli-Palmarini, M.: 1989, ‘Evolution, Selection and Cognition: From “Learning” to Parameter Setting in Biology and in the Study of Language’, Cognition 31, 1-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S.: 1994, The Language Instinct, William Morrow, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S.: 1997, http://www.edge.org/discourse/pinker_organs.html

  • Quartz, S.R.: 1993, ‘Neural Networks, Nativism, and the Plausibility of Constructivism’, Cognition 48, 223-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quartz, S.R.: 1999, ‘The Constructivist Brain’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3, 48-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quartz, S.R.: in press, ‘Learning and Brain Development: A Neural Constructivist Perspective’, in P. Quinlan (ed.), Connectionist Models of Development, Psychology Press.

  • Quartz, S.R. and Sejnowski, T.J.: 1997, ‘The Neural Basis of Cognitive Development: A Constructivist Manifesto’, Behavioral and Brain Scencesi 20, 537-596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, P.T.: 1998, ‘Structural Change and Development in Real and Artificial Neural Networks’, Neural Networks 11, 577-599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding, N.J., Kowalczyk, A. and Downs, T.: 1993, ‘Constructive Higher-Order Network Algorithm that is Polynomial Time’, Neural Networks 6, 997-1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Ibañez, V., Deiber, M. P., Dold, G. and Hallett, M.: 1996, ‘Activation of the Primary Visual Cortex by Braille Reading in Blind Subjects’, Nature 380, 526-528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Deiber, M.P., Ibañez, V. and Hallett, M.: 1998, ‘Neural Networks for Braille Reading by the Blind’, Brain 121, 1213-1229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanes, D., Reh, T.H. and Harris, W.A.: 2000, Development of the Nervous System, Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperry, R.: 1963, ‘Chemoaffinity in the Orderly Growth of Nerve Fiber Patterns and Connections’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 50, 703-710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, K. and Griffiths, P.E.: 1999, Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, C.F.: 2001, ‘An Evolutionary Scaling Law for the Primate Visual System and its Basis in Cortical Function’, Nature 411, 193-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R.S. and Barto, A.G.: 1998, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valiant, L.G.: 1984, ‘A Theory of the Learnable’, Communications of the ACM 27, 1134-1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ooyen, A.: 2001, ‘Competition in the Development of Nerve Connections: A Review of Models’, Network-Computation in Neural Systems 12, 1-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik, V.N.: 2000, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory (2nd ed.). Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, K. and Culicover, P.: 1980, Formal Principles of Language Acquisition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H.: 1990, ‘Connectionist Nonparametric Regression: Multilayer Feedforward Networks Can Learn Arbitrary Mappings’, Neural Networks 3, 535-549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S.W. and Rubenstein, J.: 2000, ‘Induction and Dorsoventral Patterning of the Telencephalon’, Neuron 28, 641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, W.T. and Wong, R.O.: 2000, ‘Rapid Dendritic Movements during Synapse Formation and Rearrangement’, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 10, 118-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, X.: 1999, ‘Evolving Artificial Neural Networks’, Proceedings of the IEEE 87, 1423-1447.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quartz, S.R. Innateness and the Brain. Biology & Philosophy 18, 13–40 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023395002672

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023395002672

Navigation