Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of black bullhead (Ameiurus melas) on turbidity in a diked wetland

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Benthivorous fish in shallow, aquatic systems have been correlated with increased turbidity and declines in macrophyte production and wildlife use. Bullheads have been credited with increasing turbidity, but this has been seldom tested and has not been studied in a diked marsh. To assess the relationships of black bullhead (Ameiurus melas) and turbidity, we assembled mesocosmsin the Show Pool Management Unit of The Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge, OH, U.S.A. We stocked treatment enclosures with different biomasses of black bullhead at weekly intervals. Mean turbidity within treatment enclosures was significantly higher than within controls but remained lower than that of the open marsh. Both surface and bottom turbidity increased with adult and juvenile black bullhead biomass. Turbidity increased with fine sand concentration only in the presence of juvenile fish. Wind speed and direction were significant influences on the turbidity of the open marsh, but not within control enclosures. That treatment turbidity – even at extreme biomasses – remained significantly lower than the turbidity of the open marsh implicates fetch in having a greater influence on a marsh's turbidity than the presence of black bullhead. The greater impact of benthivorous fish on turbidity within shallow systems may be an indirect one through the destruction of macrophytes and subsequent destabilization of unconsolidated substrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bookhout, T. A., K. E. Bednarik & R. W. Kroll, 1989. The Great Lakes marshes. In Smith, L.M., R. L. Pederson & R. M. Kaminski (eds), Habitat Management for Migrating and Wintering Waterfowl in North America. Texas University Press, Lubbock: 131–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouffard, S. H. & M. A. Hanson, 1997. Fish in waterfowl marshes: waterfowl managers' perspective. Wildlife Soc. Bull. 25: 146–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breder, C. M., 1939. Variations in the nesting habits of Ameiurus nebulosus (Le Sueur). Zoologica 24: 367–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breukelaar, A. W., E. H. R. R. Lammens, J. G. P. K. Breteler & I. Tátrai, 1994. Effects of benthivorous bream (Abramis brama) and carp (Cyprinus carpio) on sediment resuspension and concentrations of nutrients and chlorophyll a. Freshwat. Biol. 32: 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R. D. & B. A. Branson, 1978. Ecology and population dynamics of the black bullhead, Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque), in central Kentucky. Tulane studies Zool. and Bot. 20:99–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline, J. M., T. L. East & S. T. Threlkeld, 1994. Fish interactions with the sediment–water interface. Hydrobiologia 275/276: 301–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreimanis, A., 1962. Quantitative gasometric determination of calcite and dolomite by using the Chittick apparatus. J. sedimentary Petrology 32: 520–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. P. & S. F. Mitchell, 1997. Wave-induced shear stress, plant nutrients and chlorophyll in seven shallow lakes. Freshwat. Biol. 38: 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, M. A. & M. G. Butler, 1994a. Responses of plankton, turbidity, and macrophytes to biomanipulation in a shallow prairie. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 51: 1180–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, M. A. & M. G. Butler, 1994b. Responses to food web manipulation in a shallow waterfowl lake. Hydrobiologia 279/280: 457–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, M. A. & M. G. Butler, 1990. Early responses of plankton and turbidity to biomanipulation in a shallow prairie lake. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 317–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havens, K. E., 1991. Fish-induced sediment resuspension: effects on algal biomass and productivity in a shallow hyper-eutrophic lake. J. Plankton Res. 13: 1163–1176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havens, K. E., 1993, Responses to experimental fish manipulations in a shallow, hypereutrophic lake: the relative importance of benthic nutrient recycling and trophic cascade. Hydrobiologia 254: 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. W., M. J. Rutledge, B. L. Chisnall & F. J. Ward, 1992. Effects of elevated turbidity on shallow lake fish communities. Envir. Biol. Fishes 35: 149–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herdendorf, C. E., 1987. The ecology of the coastal marshes of western Lake Erie: a community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Biological report 85.

  • Herdendorf, C. E., 1992. Lake Erie coastal wetlands: an overview. J. Great Lakes Res. 18: 533–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosper, S. H. & E. Jagtman, 1990. Biomanipulation additional to nutrient control for restoration of shallow lakes in The Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 523–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosper, H. & M-L. Meijer, 1993. Biomanipulation, will it work for your lake? A simple test for the assessment of chances for clear water, following drastic fish-stock reduction in shallow, eutrophic lakes. Ecol. Eng. 2: 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeppesen, E., J. P. Jensen, M. Sondergaard, T. Lauridsen, L. J. Pedersen & L. Jensen, 1997. Top-down control in freshwater lakes: the role of nutrient state, submerged macrophytes and water depth. Hydrobiologia 342: 151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. L., 1989. Lake Erie wetlands: fisheries considerations. In Kreiger, K. A. (ed.), Lake Erie and Its Estuarine Systems: Issues, Resources, Status, and Management. NOAA Estuary-ofthe-month Seminar Series No. 14, 4May 1988.Washington, DC: 257–273.

  • Johnson, D. L, W. E. Lynch Jr. & T. W. Morrison, 1997a. Fish communities in a diked Lake Erie wetland and an adjacent undiked area. Wetlands 17(1): 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. L., T. W. Morrison, V. L. McLean & S. T. Zezula, 1997b. Alternative management strategies for diked marshes: fi-nal report for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Service; Ohio Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. The Ohio State University School of Natural Resources, Columbus, OH: 311 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilmer, V. L. & L. T. Alexander, 1949. Methods of making mechanical analysis of soils. Soil Sci. 68: 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. R. & G. S. Hunt, 1967. Effect of carp on vegetation in a Lake Erie marsh. J. Wildlife Manage. 31: 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolterman, B. F., 1990. Effects of common carp and black bullheads on sago pondweed. M.S. thesis. South Dakota State University, Brookings: 100 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, R. W., J. F. Gottgens & B. P. Swartz, 1997. Wild rice to riprap: 120 years of habitat changes and management of a Lake Erie coastal marsh.Transactions of the 1997 North amer. Wildlife Natural Resources Conference: 490–500.

  • LaMotte Company. LaMotte Turbidimeter Operator's Manual: Model 2008. LaMotte Company, Chestertown, Maryland: 11 pp.

  • Lassen, C., N. P. Revsbech & O. Pedersen, 1997. Macrophyte development and resuspension regulate the photosynthesis and production of benthic microalgae. Hydrobiologia 350: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littel, R. C., G. A. Milliken, W. W. Stroup & R. D. Wolfinger, 1996. SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lougheed, V. L., B. Crosbie & P. Chow-Fraser, 1998. Predictions on the effect of carp exclusion on water quality, zooplankton and submergent macrophytes in a Great Lakes wetland. Can. J. Fish aquat. Sci. 55:1189–1197.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, V. L., 1996. Carp impacts on diked wetland communities. M.S. thesis. The Ohio State University, Columbus: 145 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, M. L., M. W. de Haan, A. W. Breukelaar & H. Buiteveld, 1990. Is reduction of the benthivorous fish an important cause of high transparency following biomanipulation in shallow lakes? Hydrobiologia 200/201: 303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minitab Inc., 1996. Minitab users guide, release 11 for windows. Minitab Inc., State College, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W. J., 1992. Combining ecosystem and landscape approaches to Great Lakes wetlands. J. Great Lakes Res. 18: 552–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W. J., B. C. Reeder & D. Robb, 1994. Modelling ecosystem and landscape scales of Lake Erie coastal wetlands. In Mitsch, W. J. (ed.), Global Wetlands: Old World and New. Elsevier Science B. V., Amsterdam: 563–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mjelde, M. & B. A. Faafeng, 1997. Ceratophyllum demersum hampers phytoplankton development in some small Norwegian lakes over a wide range of phosphorus concentrations and geographical latitude. Freshwat. Biol. 37: 355–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, B., 1990. Engineering and biological approaches to the restoration from eutrophication of shallow lakes in which aquatic plant communities are important components. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 367–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muskgrave, D. K. & G. D. Derringer, 1985. Soil survey of Ottawa Co., Ohio. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Consertvation Service in cooperation w/ Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Lands and Soil and Ohio Agricultural Resource and Devlopment Center.

  • Nelson, D. W. & L. E. Sommers, 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In Page, A. L., R. H. Miller and D. R. Keeney (eds), Methods of Soil Analysis, pt 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties, Agronomy Monograph 9, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI: 539–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozimek, T., R. D. Gulati & E. Van Donk, 1990. Can macrophytes be useful in biomanipulationof lakes? The Lake Zwemlust example. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 399–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, M. R., M. L. Meijer, P. Dawidowicz & H. Coops, 1997. Biomanipulation in the shallow lakes: state of the art. Hydrobiologia 342: 355–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, G. J., 1956. A study of three methods for determination of organic carbon in Ohio soils of several great groups and the profile distribution of carbon-nitrogen ratios. MS thesis. The Ohio State University, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, H. H., 1985. Avian communities in controlled and uncontrolled Great Lakes wetlands. In Prince H. H. & F. M. D’Itri (eds), Coastal Wetlands. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, MI: 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin, J. & S. T. Threlkeld, 1990. Experimental comparison of the effects of benthivorous fish and planktivorous fish on plankton community structure. Arch. Hydrobiol. 119: 121–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M. J. & F. G. Whoriskey, 1992. Factors influencing the production of turbidity by goldfish (Carassius auratus). Can. J. Zool. 70: 1585–1589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M. J., F. G. Whoriskey & L. H. Roy, 1995. Turbidity generation and biological impacts of an exotic fish Carassius auratus, introduced into shallow seasonally anoxic ponds. J. Fish Biol. 47: 576–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemann, B., K. Christoffersen, H. J. Jensen, J. P. Müller, C. Lindegaard & S. Bosselmann, 1990. Ecological consequences of a manual reduction of roach and bream in a eutrophic temperate lake. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb, D. M., 1989. Diked and undiked freshwater coastal marshes of western Lake Erie. M.S. thesis. The Ohio State University, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb, D. & W. J. Mitsch, 1989. Hydroperiods and water chemistry of diked and undiked wetlands in western Lake Erie. In Mitsch, W. J. (ed.), Wetlands of Ohio's Coastal Lake Erie. Technical report to the Ohio Department of Natural Resources and the Ohio Sea Grant Program: 113–134.

  • SAS Institute, Inc., 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03 edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC: 1028 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc., 1993. SAS Companion for the Microsoft Windows Environment, Version 6, First edn. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC: 356 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M., 1990. Multiplicity of stable states in freshwater systems. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 475–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M., S. H. Hosper, M-L. Meijer, B. Moss & E. Jeppesen, 1993. Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 275–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidorkewicj, N. S., A. C. L. Cazorla & O. A. Fernandez, 1996. The interaction between Cyprinus carpio L. and Potamogeton pectinatus L. under aquarium conditions. Hydrobiologia 340: 271–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. L., 1985. The Inland Fishes of New York State. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany: 522 pp.

  • Tarzwell, C. M., 1941. The fish population of a small pond in northern Alabama. In Transactions of the fifth American wildlife conference. Wildlife Institute, Washington, DC: 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, D. K. (ed.), 1970. The Water Encyclopedia. Water Information Center, Inc., Port Washington, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trautman, M. B., 1981. The Fishes of Ohio, 2nd edn. The Ohio State University Press, Columbus: 782 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service, 1984. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods and Procedures for Collecting Soil Samples, Method 3A. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 1. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service, 1972a. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods and Procedures for Collecting Soil Samples, Method 6A2B. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 1. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service, 1972b. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods and Procedures for Collecting Soil Samples, Method 8Cla. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 1. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service, 1972c. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods and Procedures For Collecting Soil Samples, Method 8Cle. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 1. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Donk, E., M. P. Grimm, R. D. Gulati & J. P. G. Klein Breteler, 1990a. Whole-lake food-web manipulation as a means to study community interactions in a small ecosystem. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 275–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Donk, E., M. P. Grimm, R. D. Gulati, P. G. M. Heuts, W. A. De Kloet & L. Van Liere, 1990b. First attempt to apply wholelake food-web manipulation on a large scale in The Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 291–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welcomme, R. L. (ed.), 1981. Register of International Transfers of Inland Fish Species. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 213: 120 pp.

  • Welcomme, R.L. (ed.), 1988. International Introductions of Inland Aquatic Species. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 294: 318 pp.

  • Wilber, C. G., 1983. Turbidity in the Aquatic Environment. C.C. Thomas, Springfield, IL: 133 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, 2021 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH, 43210, U.S.A.

    Eugene C. Braig & David L. Johnson

Authors
  1. Eugene C. Braig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David L. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braig, E.C., Johnson, D.L. Impact of black bullhead (Ameiurus melas) on turbidity in a diked wetland. Hydrobiologia 490, 11–21 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023405823216

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023405823216

Search

Navigation