Abstract
I examine the ways in which scientists create and present self-identities. Previous work, in particular research on social stratification in science, has underplayed identity and its contextual variations. I draw upon interviews with scientists who work in two distinct types of American universities, which provides a comparative basis on which to study identities in different contexts of scientific practice. I focus on three aspects of careers, which ground my comparative analysis: commitment, mobility concerns, and the uses of work history.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abbott, A. (1988). The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Allison, P. D., J. S. Long, and T. K. Krauze. (1982). “Cumulative Advantage and Inequality in Science.” American Sociological Review 47:615-625.
Berger, P. L. and T. Luckmann. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Caplow, T. and R. J. McGee. (1958). The Academic Marketplace. New York: Basic.
Clarke, A. and J. H. Fujimura (eds.). (1992). The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cole, J. R. (1979). Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community. New York: Columbia University Press.
Cole, S. (1992). Making Science: Between Nature and Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
—. (1979). “Age and Scientific Performance.” American Journal of Sociology 84:958-977.
Cole, J. R. and S. Cole. (1973). Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cole, S. and J. R. Cole. (1967). “Scientific Output and Recognition: A Study in the Operation of the Reward System in Science.” American Sociological Review 32:377-390.
Coleman, J. S. (1969). Foreword to Bernard C. Rosen, Harry J. Crockett, Jr., and Clyde Z. Nunn (eds.) Achievement in American Society. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
Crane, D. (1970). “The Academic Marketplace Revisited: A Study of Faculty Mobility Using the Cartter Ratings.” American Journal of Sociology 75:953-964.
—. (1969). “Social Class Origin and Academic Success: The Influence of Two Stratification Systems on Academic Careers.” Sociology of Education 42:1-17.
—. (1965). “Scientists at Major and Minor Universities: A Study of Productivity and Recognition.” American Sociological Review 30:699-714.
Eiduson, B. T. (1962). Scientists: Their Psychological World. New York: Basic.
Gieryn, T. F. (Forthcoming). Cultural Cartography of Science: Episodes of Boundary Work, Sociologically Rendered. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
—. (1983). “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48:781-795.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual. New York: Pantheon.
—. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
Goldberger, M. L., B. A. Maher, and P. E. Flattau (eds.). (1995). Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Gouldner, A. W. (1957–58). “Cosmopolitans and Locals: Toward an Analysis of Latent Social Roles I and II.” Administrative Science Quarterly 2:281-306; 444–480.
Gustin, B. H. (1973). “Charisma, Recognition, and the Motivation of Scientists.” American Journal of Sociology 78:1119-1134.
Hagstrom, W. O. (1971). “Inputs, Outputs, and the Prestige of University Science Departments.” Sociology of Education 44:375-397.
Hargens, L. L. (1975). Patterns of Scientific Research: A Comparative Analysis of Research in Three Scientific Fields. Washington, D.C.: American Sociological Association.
—. (1969). “Patterns of Mobility of New Ph.D.'s among American Academic Institutions.” Sociology of Education 42:18-37.
Hermanowicz, J. C. (1998). The Stars Are Not Enough: Scientists—Their Passions and Professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jasanoff, S., G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, and T. J. Pinch (eds.). (1995). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jones, L. V., G. Lindzey, and P. E. Coggeshall (eds.). (1982). An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Mathematical and Physical Sciences. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Krieger, M. H. (1992). Doing Physics: How Physicists Take Hold of the World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Lamont, M. (1992). Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Classes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Long, J. S. (1978). “Productivity and Academic Position in the Scientific Career.” American Sociological Review 43:889-908.
Long, J. S. and M. F. Fox. (1995). “Scientific Careers: Universalism and Particularism.” Annual Review of Sociology 21:45-71.
Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McHugh, P. (1968). Defining the Situation: The Organization of Meaning in Social Interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Merton, R. K. (1973a). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
—. (1973b). “The Matthew Effect in Science.” Pp. 439-459 in The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
—. ([1942] 1973). “The Normative Structure of Science.” Pp. 267-278 in The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Neugarten, B. L., J. W. Moore, and J. C. Lowe. (1965). “Age Norms, Age Constraints, and Adult Socialization.” American Journal of Sociology 70(6):710-717.
Roe, A. (1952). The Making of a Scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead.
Rossiter, M. W. (1995). Women Scientists in America: Before Affirmative Action, 1940–1972. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
—. (1982). Women Scientists in American: Struggles and Strategies to 1940. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Shapin, S. (1995). “Here and Everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.” Annual Review of Sociology 21:289-321.
Sonnert, G. and G. Holton. (1995). Gender Differences in Science Careers: The Project Access Study. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Strauss. A. L. (1993). Continual Permutations of Action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
—. (1978). “A Social World Perspective.” Pp. 233-244 in Anselm L. Strauss (ed.) Creating Sociological Awareness. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction.
Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zuckerman, H. (1988). “The Sociology of Science.” Pp. 511-574 in N. J. Smelser (ed.) Handbook of Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
—. (1977). Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States. New York: The Free Press.
Zuckerman, H., J. R. Cole, and J. T. Bruer (eds.). (1991). The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community. New York: Norton.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hermanowicz, J.C. The Presentation of Occupational Self in Science. Qualitative Sociology 21, 129–148 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023482510982
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023482510982