Skip to main content
Log in

The Presentation of Occupational Self in Science

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I examine the ways in which scientists create and present self-identities. Previous work, in particular research on social stratification in science, has underplayed identity and its contextual variations. I draw upon interviews with scientists who work in two distinct types of American universities, which provides a comparative basis on which to study identities in different contexts of scientific practice. I focus on three aspects of careers, which ground my comparative analysis: commitment, mobility concerns, and the uses of work history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abbott, A. (1988). The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. D., J. S. Long, and T. K. Krauze. (1982). “Cumulative Advantage and Inequality in Science.” American Sociological Review 47:615-625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L. and T. Luckmann. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplow, T. and R. J. McGee. (1958). The Academic Marketplace. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. and J. H. Fujimura (eds.). (1992). The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. R. (1979). Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. (1992). Making Science: Between Nature and Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1979). “Age and Scientific Performance.” American Journal of Sociology 84:958-977.

  • Cole, J. R. and S. Cole. (1973). Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. and J. R. Cole. (1967). “Scientific Output and Recognition: A Study in the Operation of the Reward System in Science.” American Sociological Review 32:377-390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1969). Foreword to Bernard C. Rosen, Harry J. Crockett, Jr., and Clyde Z. Nunn (eds.) Achievement in American Society. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. (1970). “The Academic Marketplace Revisited: A Study of Faculty Mobility Using the Cartter Ratings.” American Journal of Sociology 75:953-964.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1969). “Social Class Origin and Academic Success: The Influence of Two Stratification Systems on Academic Careers.” Sociology of Education 42:1-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1965). “Scientists at Major and Minor Universities: A Study of Productivity and Recognition.” American Sociological Review 30:699-714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiduson, B. T. (1962). Scientists: Their Psychological World. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T. F. (Forthcoming). Cultural Cartography of Science: Episodes of Boundary Work, Sociologically Rendered. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • —. (1983). “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48:781-795.

  • Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger, M. L., B. A. Maher, and P. E. Flattau (eds.). (1995). Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1957–58). “Cosmopolitans and Locals: Toward an Analysis of Latent Social Roles I and II.” Administrative Science Quarterly 2:281-306; 444–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustin, B. H. (1973). “Charisma, Recognition, and the Motivation of Scientists.” American Journal of Sociology 78:1119-1134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagstrom, W. O. (1971). “Inputs, Outputs, and the Prestige of University Science Departments.” Sociology of Education 44:375-397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargens, L. L. (1975). Patterns of Scientific Research: A Comparative Analysis of Research in Three Scientific Fields. Washington, D.C.: American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1969). “Patterns of Mobility of New Ph.D.'s among American Academic Institutions.” Sociology of Education 42:18-37.

  • Hermanowicz, J. C. (1998). The Stars Are Not Enough: Scientists—Their Passions and Professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S., G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, and T. J. Pinch (eds.). (1995). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. V., G. Lindzey, and P. E. Coggeshall (eds.). (1982). An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Mathematical and Physical Sciences. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, M. H. (1992). Doing Physics: How Physicists Take Hold of the World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M. (1992). Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Classes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S. (1978). “Productivity and Academic Position in the Scientific Career.” American Sociological Review 43:889-908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S. and M. F. Fox. (1995). “Scientific Careers: Universalism and Particularism.” Annual Review of Sociology 21:45-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, P. (1968). Defining the Situation: The Organization of Meaning in Social Interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1973a). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1973b). “The Matthew Effect in Science.” Pp. 439-459 in The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. ([1942] 1973). “The Normative Structure of Science.” Pp. 267-278 in The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugarten, B. L., J. W. Moore, and J. C. Lowe. (1965). “Age Norms, Age Constraints, and Adult Socialization.” American Journal of Sociology 70(6):710-717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, A. (1952). The Making of a Scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, M. W. (1995). Women Scientists in America: Before Affirmative Action, 1940–1972. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1982). Women Scientists in American: Struggles and Strategies to 1940. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. (1995). “Here and Everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.” Annual Review of Sociology 21:289-321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnert, G. and G. Holton. (1995). Gender Differences in Science Careers: The Project Access Study. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss. A. L. (1993). Continual Permutations of Action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1978). “A Social World Perspective.” Pp. 233-244 in Anselm L. Strauss (ed.) Creating Sociological Awareness. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction.

  • Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H. (1988). “The Sociology of Science.” Pp. 511-574 in N. J. Smelser (ed.) Handbook of Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1977). Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H., J. R. Cole, and J. T. Bruer (eds.). (1991). The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hermanowicz, J.C. The Presentation of Occupational Self in Science. Qualitative Sociology 21, 129–148 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023482510982

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023482510982

Navigation