Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is the Small Firms Loan Guarantee Scheme Hazardous for Banks or Helpful to Small Business?

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Loan guarantee schemes are an integral part of SME policy in both developed and developing countries. Yet little has been done to evaluate such programmes, particularly in terms of their ability to correct for capital market imperfections. This paper uses individual loan data from some 42,000 UK SFLGS backed debt contracts to empirically test the default specification outlined in the seminal credit rationing paper of Stiglitz and Weiss (1981). The results show that default (failure) does increase with the banks cost of capital, but not with the government premium. In addition, default appears to be determined by a whole host of other factors not typically considered in the credit rationing literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger, A. N. and G. F. Udell, 1992, 'Some Evidence on the Empirical Significance of Credit Rationing', Journal of Political Economy 100(5), 1047–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besanko, D. and A. V. Thakor, 1987, 'Collateral and Credit Rationing: sorting Equilibria in Monopolistic and Competitive Credit Markets', International Economic Review 28 (October), 671–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bester, H., 1985, 'Screening vs Rationing in Credit Markets with Imperfect Information', American Economic Review 75 (September), 850–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. and A. Oswald, 1998, 'What Makes an Entrepreneur?', Journal of Labor Economics 16(1), 26–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, M, 1999, 'The Role of Loan Commitments in Credit Allocation', Occasional Papers in Industrial Strategy, Entrepreneurship and Small Business Series, No. 99/03. The Birmingham Business School.

  • Fazzari, S., R. Glen Hubbard, and B. Peterson, 1988, 'Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment', Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 141–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B., 1992, 'Investment and Research and Development at the Firm Level: Does the Source of Finance Matter?', NBER Working Paper, No. 49096. Cambridge, MA.

  • Holtz-Eakin, D., D. Joulfaian and H. Rosen, 1994, 'Sticking it Out: Entrepreneurial Survival and Liquidity Constraints', Journal of Political Economy 102(11), 53–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, D., 1971, Credit Rationing and the Commercial Loan Market, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG, 1999, An Evaluation of the Small Firms Loan Guarantee Scheme, London: Department of Trade and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindh, T. and H. Ohlsson, 1996, 'Self-Employment and Windfall Gains: Evidence from the Swedish Lottery', Economic Journal 106(439), 1515–1526.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Foundation for Entrepreneurial Management, London Business Schhol, London, NW1 4SA, U.K

    Marc Cowling

  2. Structural Economics Analysis Division, Bank of England, Threadneedle Street, London, EC2R 8AH, U.K

    Peter Mitchell

Authors
  1. Marc Cowling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Mitchell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cowling, M., Mitchell, P. Is the Small Firms Loan Guarantee Scheme Hazardous for Banks or Helpful to Small Business?. Small Business Economics 21, 63–71 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024408932156

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024408932156

Keywords

Search

Navigation