Skip to main content
Log in

210Pb and 210Po concentrations in the Venice lagoon ecosystem (Italy) and the potential radiological impact to the local public and environment

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to evaluate the possible radiological impact to the local public and environment from a phosphogypsum stockpile, 210Po and 210Pb concentrations in river water, lagoon water, suspended matter, superficial sediment, algae and bivalves samples collected in Venice lagoon area have been investigated. The results show that the mean 210Po and 210Pb concentrations in river water are 1.42±0.36 mBq.l-1 and 1.46±0.39 mBq.l-1 with a mean 210Po/210Pb ratio of 0.98±0.17 and about 60% of them are associated with the particulate; 210Po and 210Pb contribution from the phosphogypsum stockpile to the river water is negligible. Higher 210Po (2.61-5.67 mBq.l-1) and 210Pb (1.31-3.62 mBq.l-1) concentrations in the lagoon waters have been observed if compared with the literature values. About 60% of 210Po and 210Pb are found in the soluble form with a mean 210Po/210Pb ratio of 1.79±1.47. 210Po and 210Pb concentrations in 28 out 37 sediment samples ranged from 26 to 45 Bq.kg-1 (dry weight), only 9 sediments with 210Po and 210Pb concentrations greater than 45 Bq.kg-1 are found and most of them are located 1-4 km near the phosphogypsum stockpile. The elevated 210Po and 210Pb concentrations in the sediments may be due to the contamination from the phosphogypsum stockpile. The mean 210Po/210Pb ratio (0.986±0.049) in the sediments shows that 210Po and 210Pb exist in nearly secular equilibrium. 210Po and 210Pb concentrations in algae vary with different species. The mean 210Po and 210Pb concentrations in Gracilaria compress and Ulva laetevirens which show a similar behavior, are 3.18±1.23 Bq.kg-1 and 2.42±1.26 Bq.kg-1 (fresh weight), respectively, with a mean 210Po/210Pb ratio of 1.45±0.34. The mean concentration factors with respect to the filtered water are 1096±424 for 210Po and 1299±680 for 210Pb. The mean 210Po and 210Pb concentrations in the soft part of Mytilus edulis are 23.2±9.7 Bq.kg-1 and 0.537±0.203 Bq.kg-1 (fresh weight), respectively, with a mean 210Po/210Pb ratio of 43.6±10.0. The mean concentration factors with respect to the filtered water are 8006±3351 for 210Po and 290±109 for 210Pb, showing a very high accumulation effect for 210Po. The accumulation behaviors of Cerastoderma glaucum and Tapes philippinarum for 210Po are similar to Mytilus edulis, but that for 210Pb seems less effective, corresponding to a relatively higher 210Po/210Pb ratio. The estimated committed effective doses from 210Po for the individual local public through ingestion of bivalves are in the range of 0.050-0.231 mSv.y-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Martinez-Aguirre, M. Garcia-Leon, J. Environ. Radioact., 22 (1994) 155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. H. W. KÖster, P. A. Marwitz, G. W. Berger, A. W. Van Weers, P. Hagel, J. Nieuwenhuize, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 45 (1992) 715.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. M. Rutherford, M. J. Dudas, R. A. Samek, Sci. Total Environ., 149 (1994) 1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. C. D. Hull, W. C. Burnett, J. Environ. Radioact., 32 (1996) 213.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. F. P. Carvalho, Sci. Total Environ., 159 (1995) 201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Testa, D. Desideri, F. Guerra, M. A. Meli, C. Roselli, S. Degetto, Czechosl. J. Phys., 49 (1999) 649, Suppl. S1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Donazzolo, A. A. Orio, B. Pavoni, G. Perin, Oceanol. Acta, 7 (1984) 25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jia, Guogang, M. Belli, M. Blasi, A. Marchetti, S. Rosamilia, U. Sansone, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 247 (2001) 491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. W. R. Schell, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 24 (1997) 1019.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. R. Folsom, K. M. Wong, V. F. Hodge, Natural Radiation Environment, Vol. II, J. A. Adams, W. M. Lowder and X. Y. Gessel (Eds), ERDA Co 780805, 1975, p. 2, 863.

  11. T. C. Langford, Health Phys., 20 (1971) 331.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. E. Poet, H. E. Moore, E. A. Martell, J. Geophys. Res., 77 (1972) 6515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. H. E. Moore, S. E. Poet, E. A. Martell, J. Geophys. Res., 78 (1973) 7065.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. T. P. Ryan, D. A. T. McGarry, D. Pollard, T. D. Cunningham, J. Environ. Radioact., 43 (1999) 325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Heyraud, R. D. Cherry, H. D. Oschadleus, C. J. Augustyn, M. I. Cherry, J. C. Sealy, J. Environ. Radioact., 24 (1994) 253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. P. McDonald, M. S. Baxter, S. W. Fowler, J. Environ. Radioact., 18 (1993) 181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. IAEA, Technical Reports Series No. 247, IAEA, Vienna, 1985, p. 71.

  18. C. R. Hill, Nature, 208 (1965) 423.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Heyraud, R. D. Cherry, E. B. Dowdle, J. Environ. Radioact., 5 (1987) 249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. R. D. Cherry, M. Heyraud, R. Rindfuss, J. Environ. Radioact., 24 (1994) 273.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Marcomini, M. Zanette, F. D. Andrea, S. Della Sala, Diossine Ambiente e Salute, Comune di Venezia, Assessorato all'Ecologia, Arsenale Editrice, 1997.

  22. NRPB, National Radiological Protection Board, NRPB-GS7, 1987, p. 114.

  23. ICRP, ICRP Publication No. 26 (1977), Pergamon Press, Oxford, p. 53.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jia, G., Belli, M., Sansone, U. et al. 210Pb and 210Po concentrations in the Venice lagoon ecosystem (Italy) and the potential radiological impact to the local public and environment. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 256, 513–528 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024512118760

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024512118760

Keywords

Navigation