Abstract
Student fees for university programmes in Canada have risen dramatically in recent years. This has been justified by the argument that such increases offer no economic disincentive to students seeking university admission. The present essay comments on that argument and finds several weaknesses in it. Fee increases may still be necessary, but this argument at least does not establish that they are innocuous.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Balzarini, D. (1980, May). Is the academic rewarded in this lifetime? Bulletin of the Canadian Association of University Teachers, 27, 36.
Gose, B. (1998, March 6). Recent shifts on aid by elite colleges signal new push to help the middle class. Chronicle of Higher Education p. A4.
Human Resources Development Canada. (1996, July). Report of the Ministerial task force on youth. Ottawa: Human Resources Development Canada.
Isolated institutions face fall in applications. (1986, January 16). Times Higher Education Supplement, p. 6.
Psacharopoulos, G. (1984). The contribution of education to economic growth. In J.W. Kendrick (Ed.), International comparisons of productivity and causes of the slowdown (pp. 335–355). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Rose, D. & Sorenson, R. (1992-1993). High tuition, financial aid, and crosssubsidization: Do needy students really benefit? Southern Economic Journal, 59, 66–76.
Stager, D. (1996). Returns to investment in Ontario university education, 1960-1990, and implications for student tuition fee policy. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 26, 1–22.
University of Toronto. (1999. January). Report of the Provost's task force on tuition and student financial support. Toronto: University of Toronto.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, F. Education as Economic Investment: Comments on Tuition Fee Policy. Interchange 34, 89–104 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024514719608
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024514719608