Abstract
A framework of welfare accounts (Juster and Stafford, 1985; Headey, 1993; see also Goodin et al., 1999) is used to assess gains and losses to East and West Germans in the post-reunification period, 1990–1997. The welfare accounts have three segments: a capital/stocks account, an income/flows account and a subjective welfare/psychic income account. This framework differs from conventional welfare economic accounts in explicitly defining and measuring welfare in psychological terms ... as perceived utility/satisfaction. It has recently been argued that this approach is required, if one accepts that individual utilities are not exogenous but are affected by changing comparisons with others (Duesenberry, 1949; Easterlin, 1974, 1995; Hollaender, 2001). Our hypotheses are that in the post-reunification period West German welfare was sacrificed – in all three segments of the accounts – in order to permit resources to flow to East Germans and to boost their stocks, flows and utilities. The hypotheses are supported in the case of West Germans, but results are mixed for East Germans. Our data source is the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP) which began in 1984 in West Germany and has involved reinterviewing a very large representative national sample every year since. The panel was extended to East Germany in June 1990, before formal reunification occurred, and so provides a picture of stocks, flows and utilities before the effects of integration into the Federal Republic were felt.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Andrews, F.M. and S.B. Withey: 1976, Social Indicators of Well-Being (Plenum, New York).
Argyle, M.: 1987, The Psychology of Happiness (Methuen, London).
Buhmann, B., L. Rainwater, G. Schmaus and T.M. Smeeding: 1988, 'Equivalence scales, well-being, inequality and poverty: Sensitivity estimates across ten countries using the Luxembourg Incomes Studies (LIS) database', Review of Income and Wealth 34, pp. 115-142.
Diener, E.: 1984, 'Subjective well-being', Psychological Bulletin 95, pp. 542-575.
Duesenberry, J.S.: 1949, Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior (Harvard University Press, Cambridge,MA).
Easterlin, R.A.: 1974, 'Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence', in P.A. David and M.W. Reder (eds.), Nations and Households in Economic Growth (Academic Press, New York, pp. 89-125).
Easterlin, R.A.: 1995, 'Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?' Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 27, pp. 35-47.
Frank, R.H.: 1985a, Choosing the Right Pond: Hunam Behavior and the Quest for Status Oxford University Press, Oxford).
Frank, R.H.: 1985b, 'The demand for unobservable and nonpositional goods', American Economic Review 75, pp. 101-116.
Frank, R.H.: 1997, 'The frame of reference as a public good', Economic Journal 107, pp. 1832-1847.
Goodin, R.E., B. Headey, R. Muffels and H.J. Dirven: 1999, The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Hagenaars, A.G.M.: 1991, 'The definition and measurement of poverty', in L. Osberg (ed.), Economic Inequality and Poverty: International Perspectives (ME Sharp, New York).
Headey, B.: 1993, 'An economic model of subjective well-being: Integrating economic and psychological theories', Social Indicators Research 28, pp. 97-116.
Headey, B. and A.J. Wearing: 1992, Understanding Happiness: A Theory of Subjective Well-Being (Longman Cheshire, Melbourne).
Headey, B., P. Krause and R. Habich: 1995, 'East Germany: Rising incomes, unchanged inequality and the impact of redistributive government 1990-1992', British Journal of Sociology 4, pp. 225-244.
Henderson, S., D.G. Byrne and P. Duncan-Jones: 1981, Neurosis and the Social Environment (Academic, New York).
Hirsch, F.: 1976, Social Limits to Growth (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
Hollaender, H.: 2001, 'On the validity of utility statements: Standard theory versus Duesenberry's', Journal of Economic behavior and Organization 45, pp. 227-249.
Juster, F.T. and F.P. Stafford: 1985, Time, Goods and Well-Being (Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor).
Lechner, M.: 1998, Training the East German Labour Force: Microeconometric Evaluations of Continuous Vocational Training After Unification (Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg).
OECD: 1999, Country Survey: Germany, 1999 (OECD, Paris).
Wagner, G.G., R.V. Burkhauser and F. Behringer: 1993, 'The English language public use file of the German socio-economic panel', Journal of Human Resources 28, pp. 429-433.
Witte, J.C. and G.G. Wagner: 1995, 'Declining fertility in east Germany after unification: A demographic response to socio-economic change', Population and Development Review, pp. 387-397.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Headey, B., Headey, D. German Reunification: Welfare Gains and Losses East and West. Social Indicators Research 64, 107–138 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024780114892
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024780114892