Abstract
How should policy analysis respond to the changing context of policy making? This article examines three aspects of policy analysis in this changing context: polity, knowledge and intervention. It argues that policy making now often takes place in an ‘institutional void’ where there are no generally accepted rules and norms according to which politics is to be conducted and policy measures are to be agreed upon. More than before, solutions for pressing problems transgress the sovereignty of specific polities. Furthermore, the role of knowledge changes as the relationship between science and society has changed: scientific expertise is now negotiated rather than simply accepted. And, with the weakening of the state, it is far less obvious that the government is the sole actor to intervene in policy making. This article calls for a reconsideration of the analysis of policy making in the light of this changing context. Based on a contextual perspective it calls for a revitalization of the commitments of Harold Lasswell toward a policy science of democracy by proposing a new ‘deliberative’ policy analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, B. (1992). We, the People: Foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Akkerman, T. (2001). ‘Urban debates and deliberative democracy,’ Acta Politica 36: 71-87.
Albrow, M. (1996). The Global Age: State and Society BeyondModernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft. Auf demWeg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.
Beck, U. (1991). Die Welt als Labor. Politik in der Risikogesellschaft. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 154-166.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
Beck, U. (1999).World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. et al. (1994). Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Berman, M. (1982). All that Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. London: Verso.
Carver, T. et al. (2002). ‘Discourse analysis and political science,’ European Political Science 2 (1): 48-67.
Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dahrendorf, R. (1988). The Modern Social Conflict. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
deLeon, P. (1994). ‘Reinventing the policy sciences: Three steps back to the future,’ Policy Sciences 27: 77-93.
deLeon, P. (1997). Policy Sciences and Democracy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Dryzek, J. (1982). ‘Policy analysis as hermeneutic activity,’ Policy Sciences 14: 309-329.
Dryzek, J. (1989). ‘Policy sciences of democracy,’ Polity 22: 97-118.
Dryzek, J. (1996). Democracy in Capitalist Times: Limits, Ideals, and Struggles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dryzek, J. et al., eds. (1995). Political Science in History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dunn,W.N. (1981). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Eade, J. (1997). Living the Global City: Globalization as Local Process. London: Routledge.
Epstein, S. (1996). Impure Science: Aids, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Evers, A. and H. Nowotny (1989). Uber den Umgang mit Unsicherheit. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.
Ewald, F. (1986). L'Etat Providence. Paris: Gaullimard.
Fischer, F. (1990). Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. London: Sage.
Fischer, F. (1998). ‘Beyond empiricism,’ Policy Studies Journal 26: 129-146.
Fung, A. and E.O.Wright (2001). ‘Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance,’ Politics and Society 29: 5-41.
Funtowicz, S.O. and J.R. Ravetz (1991). ‘A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues,’ in R. Costanza, ed., Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. NewYork: Columbia University Press.
Garfinkel, A. (1981). Forms of Explanation. Rethinking the Questions in Social Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gieryn, T. F. (1995). ‘Boundaries of science,’ in S. Jasanoff et al., eds., Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 393-443.
Gomart, E. and M. A. Hajer (2003, forthcoming). ‘Is that politics? Searching for forms of democratic politics,’ in B. Joerges et al., eds., Looking Back, Ahead-The Year book for the Sociology of Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Goodin, R. E. and H.-D. Klingemann (1996). New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haas, P.M. (1990). Saving the Mediterranean. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hajer, M.A. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hajer, M.A. (2000). Politiek als vormgeving. Amsterdam: Vossius Pers (inaugural address).
Hajer, M.A. (2003). ‘A frame in the fields. Policy making and the reinvention of politics,’ in M.A. Hajer and H. Wagennar, eds., Deliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hajer, M.A. and H. Wagenaar, eds. (2003). Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hannerz, U. (1996). Transnational Connections. Culture, People, Places. London: Routledge.
Harvey, D. (1989).The Conditions of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hawkesworth, M.E. (1988). Theoretical Issues in Policy Analysis. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London: Macmillan.
Heilbron, J. L. et al., eds. (1997). The Rise of the Social Sciences and the Formation of Modernity. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hillgartner, S. (2001). Science on Stage. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hobsbawn, E. J. (1977). The Age of Revolution. London: Abacus.
Holzer, B. (2001). ‘Transnational subpolitics and corporate discourse: A study of environmental protest and the Royal Dutch/Shell Group,’ Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, London School of Economics.
Innes, J. E. (1996). ‘Planning through consensus building,’ Journal of the Americam Planning Association 62: 460-472.
Innes, J. E. and D. E. Booher (1999). ‘Consensus building as role playing and bricolage: Toward a theory of collaborative planning,’ Journal of the American Planning Association 65: 9-26.
Innes, J. E. and D. E. Booher (2000). Public Participation in Planning. New Strategies for the 21st Century. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Urban and Regional Development.
Jasanoff, S. (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policy Makers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Joll, J. (1978). Europe since 1870. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Kickert,W. J. M. et al. (1997).Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage.
Kundera, M. (1992). ‘Les chemins dans le brouillard,’ L'Infini Hiver 1992: 42-64.
Lane, F.C. (1979). Profits from Power: Readings in Protection Rent and Violence Controlling Enterprises. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Lasswell, H.D. (1951). ‘The policy orientation,’ in H.D. Lasswell and D. Lerner, eds., The Policy Sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lasswell, H.D. (1971). A Pre-View of Policy Sciences. New York: American Elsevier.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lenzer, G., ed. (1975). Auguste Comte and Positivism: The Essential Writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Manin, B. (1997). The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marks, G. et al. (1996). Governance in the European Union. London: Sage.
Meny, Y. et al., eds. (1996). Adjusting to Europe. The Impact of the European Union on National Institutions and Policies. London: Routledge.
Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rhodes, R. A.W. (1996). ‘The new governance: Governing without government,’ Political Studies 44: 652-667.
Rhodes, R. A.W. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity, and Accountability. Buckingham, Philadephia: Open University Press.
Rhodes, R. A.W. (2000). ‘Governance and public administration,’ in J. Pierre, ed., Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rosenau, J.N., ed. (1995). Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schwarz, M. and M. Thompson (1990). Divided We Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Scott, J.C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Torgerson, D. (1985). Contextual orientation in policy analysis: The contribution of Harold D. Lasswell,’ Policy Sciences 18: 241-261.
Torgerson, D. (1986). ‘Between knowledge and politics: Three faces of policy analysis,’ Policy Sciences 19: 33-59.
Torgerson, D. (1992). ‘Priest and Jester in the policy sciences: Developing the focus of inquiry,’ Policy Sciences 25: 225-235.
Tribe, L. H. (1972). ‘Policy science: Analysis or ideology?’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 2: 66-110.
Wagenaar, H. and S.N. Cook (2003). ‘Understanding policy practices: Action, dialectic and deliberation in policy analysis,’ in M.A. Hajer and H. Wagenaar, eds., Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wagner (2000). Theorizing Modernity. London: Sage.
Warren, M.E. (1999). Democracy and Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston: Little, Brown.
Williams, R. (1961). The Long Revolution. London: Chatto and Windus.
Yanow, D. (1996). How Does a PolicyMean? Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Young, I.M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zürn, M. (1999). Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hajer, M. Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences 36, 175–195 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834510939
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834510939