Abstract
Framing is the process by which a communication source constructs and defines a social or political issue for its audience. While many observers of political communication and the mass media have discussed framing, few have explicitly described how framing affects public opinion. In this paper we offer a theory of framing effects, with a specific focus on the psychological mechanisms by which framing influences political attitudes. We discuss important conceptual differences between framing and traditional theories of persuasion that focus on belief change. We outline a set of hypotheses about the interaction between framing and audience sophistication, and test these in an experiment. The results support our argument that framing is not merely persuasion, as it is traditionally conceived. We close by reflecting on the various routes by which political communications can influence attitudes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ajzen, Icek, and Fishbein, Martin (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Anderson, Norman H. (1981). Foundations of Information Integration Theory. New York: Academic Press.
Bargh, John A., and Pietromonaco, Paula (1982). Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43: 437-449.
Beck, Paul Allen, Dalton, Russell J., and Huckfeldt, Robert (1995). Political intermediation in a multi-message environment: The case of the United States. Paper presented at the meeting of the Cross-National Election Project, Columbus, Ohio.
Beniger, James R., and Gusek, Jodi A. (1995). The cognitive revolution in public opinion and communication research. In Theodore L. Glasser and Charles T. Salmon (eds.), Public Opinion and the Communication of Consent. New York: Guilford.
Bennett, W. Lance. (1988). News: The Politics of Illusion, 2nd ed. New York: Longman.
Carmines, Edward G., and Kuklinski, James H. (1990). Incentives, opportunities, and the logic of public opinion in American political representation. In John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski (eds.), Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Chong, Dennis (1993). How people think, reason and feel about rights and liberties. American Journal of Political Science 37: 867-899.
Conover, Pamela J., and Feldman, Stanley (1984). How people organize the political world: A schematic model. American Journal of Political Science 28: 95-126.
Dorman, William A., and Livingston, Steven. (1994). The news before the storm. In W. Lance Bennett and David L. Paletz (eds.), Taken by Storm: The Media, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy in the Gulf War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Eagly, Alice H., and Chaiken, Shelly (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Eagly, Alice H., and Warren, Rebecca (1976). Intelligence, comprehension, and opinion change. Journal of Personality 44: 226-242.
Edelman, Murray (1964). The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Entman, Robert M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43: 51-58.
Fabrigar, Leandre, Krosnick, Jon A., and Miller, Joanne M. (1995). What motivates issue public membership? Distinguishing between personal importance and national importance. The Ohio State University. Typescript.
Feagin, Joe R. (1975). Subordinating the Poor. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Feldman, Stanley, and Zaller, John. (1992). Political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state. American Journal of Political Science 36: 268-307.
Gamson, William A. (1992). Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge.
Gamson, William A., and Lasch, Katherine E. (1983). The political culture of social welfare policy. In Shimon E. Spiro and Ephraim Yuchtman-Yaar (eds.), Evaluating the Welfare State. New York: Academic Press.
Gamson, William A., and Modigliani, Andre. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. Research in Political Sociology 3: 137-177.
Gamson, William A., and Modigliani, Andre. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology 95: 1-37.
Gitlin, Todd. (1980). The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Goffman, Erving (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
Gurevitch, Michael, and Blumler, Jay G. (1994). Political communication systems and democratic values. In Doris A. Graber (ed.), Media Power in Politics, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Hallin, Daniel C. (1992). Sound bite news: Television coverage of elections, 1968–1988. Journal of Communication 42: 5-24.
Hanson, Russell L. (1993). Deliberation, tolerance and democracy. In George E. Marcus and Russell L. Hanson (eds.), Reconsidering the Democratic Public. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
Hochschild, Jennifer (1981). What's Fair? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hochschild, Jennifer (1993). Disjunction and ambivalence in citizens' political outlooks. In George E. Marcus and Russell L. Hanson (eds.), Reconsidering the Democratic Public. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Hovland, Carl I., Janis, Irving L., and Kelley, Harold H. (1953). Communication and Persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hurwitz, Jon (1989). Presidential leadership and public followership. In Michael Margolis and Gary A. Mauser (eds.), Manipulating Public Opinion. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Iyengar, Shanto (1991). Is Anyone Responsible? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Kinder, Donald (1987). News That Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Simon, Adam (1994). News coverage of the Gulf crisis and public opinion: A study of agenda-setting, priming, and framing. In W. Lance Bennett and David L. Paletz (eds.), Taken by Storm: The Media, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy in the Gulf War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jaccard, James (1981). Toward theories of persuasion and belief change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40: 260-269.
Jaccard, James, and Becker, Michael A. (1985). Attitudes and behavior: An information integration perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 21: 440-465.
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist 39: 341-50.
Kinder, Donald R. and Herzog, Don. (1993). Democratic discussion. In George E. Marcus and Russell L. Hanson (eds.), Reconsidering the Democratic Public. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
Kinder, Donald R., and Sanders, Lynn M. (1990). Mimicking political debate with survey questions: The case of white opinion on affirmative action for blacks. Social Cognition 8: 73-103.
Kingdon, John W. (1993). Politicians, self-interest and ideas. In George E. Marcus and Russell L. Hanson (eds.), Reconsidering the Democratic Public. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Klapper, Joseph T. (1960). The Effects of Mass Communications. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Kluegel, James R. (1987). Macro-economic problems, beliefs about the poor and attitudes toward welfare spending. Social Problems 34: 82-99.
Kluegel, James R. and Smith, Eliot (1986). Beliefs About Inequality: Americans' Views of What Is and What Ought to Be. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Krosnick, Jon A., and Brannon, Laura A. (1993). The media and the foundations of presidential support: George Bush and the Persian Gulf conflict. Journal of Social Issues 49: 167-182.
Krosnick, Jon A., and Fabrigar, Leandre R. (n.d.). Designing Questionnaires to Measure Attitudes. New York: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.
Krosnick, Jon A, and Kinder, Donald R. (1990). Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming. American Political Science Review 84: 497-512.
Kuklinski, James H., Luskin, Robert C., and Bolland, John (1991). Where is the schema? Going beyond the “S” word in political psychology. American Political Science Review 85: 1341-1356.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (ed.), The Communication of Ideas: Religion and Civilization Series. New York: Harper and Row.
Lazarsfeld, Paul, Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, Helen (1944). The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
Leo, John (1994/95). Framing the wrong picture. Newsweek, Dec. 26–Jan. 2, p. 21.
Lodge, Milton G., and Hamill, Ruth (1986). A partisan schema for political information processing. American Political Science Review 80: 505-519.
Luker, Kristin (1984). Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
McClelland, Gary H., and Judd, Charles M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin 114: 376-390.
McCombs, Maxwell E., and Shaw, Donald R. (1972). The agenda-setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36: 176-187.
McGraw, Kathleen M., and Pinney, Neil (1990). The effects of general and domain-specific expertise on political memory and judgment. Social Cognition 8: 9-30.
McGuire, William J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In Leonard Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. I. New York: Academic Press.
McGuire, William J. (1968). Personality and susceptibility to social influence. In E. F. Borgatta and W. W. Lambert (eds.), Handbook of Personality Theory and Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
McGuire, William J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In Gardner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McHugo, Gregory J., Lanzetta, John T., Sullivan, Denis G., Masters, Roger D., and Englis, Basil G. (1985). Emotional reactions to a political leader's expressive displays. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49: 1513-1529.
Miller, Arthur H., Wattenberg, Martin P., and Malanchuk, Oksana (1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates. American Political Science Review 80: 521-540.
Mutz, Diana C. (1992). Mass media and the depoliticization of personal experience. American Journal of Political Science 36: 483-508.
Nelson, Thomas E., Clawson, Rosalee A., and Oxley, Zoe M. (n.d.). Media framing of a civil liberties controversy and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review. Forthcoming.
Nelson, Thomas E., and Kinder, Donald R. (1996). Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion. Journal of Politics 58:1055-1078.
Nisbett, Richard E., and Wilson, Timothy DeCamp (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 34: 231-259.
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y. (1989). Educating and manipulating the public. In Michael Margolis and Gary A. Mauser (eds.), Manipulating Public Opinion. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Pan, Zhongdang, and Kosicki, Gerald M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication 10: 55-75.
Parenti, Michael (1986). Inventing Reality: The Politics of the Mass Media. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Patterson, Thomas E. (1993). Out of Order. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Petty, Richard T., and Cacioppo, John E. (1986). Communication and Persuasion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Rogers, Everett M., and Dearing, James W. (1994). Agenda-setting research: Where has it been, where is it going? In Doris A. Graber (ed.), Media Power in Politics, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Sears, David O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 515-530.
Sherif, Carolyn W., Sherif, Muzafer, and Nebergall, Roger E. (1965). Attitude and Attitude Change: The Social Judgment-Involvement Approach. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Sniderman, Paul, Brody, Richard, and Tetlock, Philip (1991). Reasoning and Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tetlock, Philip E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 819-827.
Tourangeau, Roger, and Rasinski, Kenneth (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin 103: 299-314.
Van der Pligt, Joop, and Eiser, J. Richard (1984). Dimensional salience, judgment, and attitudes. In J. Richard Eiser (ed.), Attitudinal Judgment. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Wolfsfeld, Gadi (1991). Media, protest, and political violence: A transactional analysis. Journalism Monographs 127: 1-61.
Wyer, Robert S., and Hartwick, Jon (1980). The role of information retrieval and conditional inference processes in belief formation and change. In Leonard Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 13: 241-284.
Zajonc, Robert B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9: 1-27.
Zajonc, Robert B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist 35: 151-75.
Zaller, John R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Zaller, John (1994). Elite leadership of mass opinion: New evidence from the Gulf War. In W. Lance Bennett and David L. Paletz (eds.), Taken by Storm: The Media, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy in the Gulf War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zaller, John R., and Feldman, Stanley (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science 36: 579-616.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nelson, T.E., Oxley, Z.M. & Clawson, R.A. Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects. Political Behavior 19, 221–246 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834831093
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834831093