Skip to main content
Log in

The Public Nature of Personal Opinion: The Impact of Collective Sentiment on Individual Appraisal

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of the public on individual opinion. Employing survey-based experiments, I demonstrate public influence to be considerable, yet the magnitude, direction, and significance of effect depends critically on the target of public sentiment and the political predispositions of the perceiver. A theoretical model is developed to delineate and examine such effects, guiding the analyses throughout. Central to this framework is the interplay between opinion context and individual, reflecting the often fluid and complex relationship between aggregate and individual judgment. The specific findings that representations of public opinion can alter the distribution of opinion through assimilation, contrast, or reinforcement are emphasized and given context within the voting and public opinion literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aronson, Elliot (1992). Reading About the Social Animal, 6th ed. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, Solomon E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon modification and distortion of judgments. In Harold Guetzdow (ed.), Groups, Leadership, and Men. Carnegie Press.

  • Bacon, Francis (1960). The New Organon and Related Writings. New York: Liberal Arts Press (originally published 1620).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, Larry M. (1985). Expectations and preferences in presidential nominating campaigns. American Political Science Review 79: 804–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, Larry M. (1988). Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, Bernard, Paul Lazarsfeld, and William McPhee (1954). Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, Steven J., and Edward L. Kain (1982). Jumping on the bandwagon with the underdog: The impact of attitude polls on polling behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly 46: 228–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E. (1962). Information flow and the stability of partisan attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly 26: 578–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eveland, William P., Jr., Douglas M. McLeod and Nancy Signorielli (1995). Actual and perceived U.S. public opinion: The spiral of silence during the Gulf War. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 7(2): 91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Stanley (1995). Answering survey questions: The measurement and meaning of public opinion. In Lodge, Milton, and McGraw (eds.), Political Judgment (pp. 249–270. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Susan T., and Shelley E. Taylor (1991). Social Cognition, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc.

  • Fleitas, D. W. (1971). Bandwagon and underdog effects in minimal information elections. American Political Science Review 65: 434–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, Tory, John A. Bargh, and Wendy Lombardi (1985). Nature of priming effects on categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11: 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I. (1954). Effects of the mass media of communication In Gardner Lindzey (ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology.

  • Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague (1987). The social flow of political information. American Political Science Review 81: 1197–1216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, Shanto (1990). Shortcuts to political knowledge: The role of selective attention and accessibility. In John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski (eds.), Information and Democratic Processes (pp. 160–185). Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald Kinder (1987). News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joslyn, Mark R. (1996). Picture made or picture given? The impact of media representations and individual predispositions on political opinion. Dissertation. Washington University, St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joslyn, Mark R., and Steve Ceccoli (1996). Attentiveness to television news and opinion change in the Fall 1992 presidential campaign. Political Behavior 18(2): 141–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel, Daniel Slovic, and Amos Tversky (eds.) (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Cheryl, and Mark Baldassare (1994). Popularity in a freefall: Measuring a spiral of silence at the end of the Bush presidency. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 6(1): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, V. O. (1949). Southern Politics in State and Nation. Knoxvill: The University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, Donald R. (1983). Diversity and complexity in American public opinion. In Ada W. Finifter (ed.), The State of the Discipline (pp. 389–428). Washington DC: American Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapper, Joseph (1960). The Effects of Mass Communication. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavrakas, Paul J. (1993). Telephone Survey Methods: Sampling, Selection, and Supervision, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, Paul, Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Guadet (1944). The People's Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKuen, Michael (1990). Speaking of politics: Individual conversational choice, public opinion, and the prospects for deliberative democracy. In John A. Fereejohn and James H. Kuklinski (eds.), Information and Democratic Processes (pp. 59–99). Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, James (1961). The Federalist No. 49. In Jacob E. Cooke (ed.), The Federalist (pp. 338–347). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondak, Jeffery J. (1993). Source cues and policy approval: The cognitive dynamics of public support for the Reagan agenda. American Journal of Political Science 37: 186–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, Diana C. (1992). Impersonal influence: Effects of representations of public opinion on political attitudes. Political Behavior 14(2): 89–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, Diana C. (1994). The political effects of perceptions of mass opinion. Research in Micropolitics 4: 143–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, N. H., S. Verba, and J. R. Petrocik (1979). The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication 34: 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth (1993). The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion, Our Social Skin, 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro (1992). The Rational Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, K. R., L. L. Kaid, and D. Nimmo (eds.) (1984). Political Communication Yearbook. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, Howard, and L. Bobo (1988). Survey-based experiments on white racial attitudes toward residential integration. American Journal of Sociology 94: 273–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, Howard, and Stanley Presser (1981). Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context. New York: Aademic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, Howard, C. Steech, and L. Bobo (1985). Racial Attitudes in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, Muzafer, and Carl I. Hovland (1961). Social Judgment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Hebert (1957). Models of Man. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman, Paul M. (1993). The new look in public opinion research. In Ada W. Finifter (ed.), The State of the Discipline II (pp. 219–246). Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman, Paul M., and Thomas Piazza (1993). The Scar of Race. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.” Science 185: 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, Robert S., and Thomas K. Scrull (1981). Category accessibility: Some theoretical and empirical issues concerning the processing of social stimulus information. In Tory E. Higgins, Peter C. Herman, and Mark P. Zanna (eds.), Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium, vol 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, John (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, John, and Stanley Feldman (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science 36: 579–616.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joslyn, M.R. The Public Nature of Personal Opinion: The Impact of Collective Sentiment on Individual Appraisal. Political Behavior 19, 337–363 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024847805976

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024847805976

Keywords

Navigation