Skip to main content
Log in

Multiple Stakeholder Judgments of Employee Behaviors: A Contingent Prototype Model of Dishonesty

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the moral judgments made by various stakeholders in determining whether an event, caused by an organizational employee, constitutes dishonesty. It models person-situation interaction effects of situations in organizational settings and persons making moral judgments to predict judgments of dishonesty. Using a prototype definition of dishonesty, the paper examines the effects of differences in four areas (the prototypicality of the act, the actor's motivation, the potential consequences, and the person judging the event) on the moral judgment of whether the event constitutes dishonesty. The implications for managers and researchers of the resulting contingent prototype model of dishonesty are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Backman, C.: 1976, 'Explorations on Psycho-ethics: The Warranting of Judgments', in R. Harre (ed.), Life Sentences: Aspects of the Social Role of Language (John Wiley & Sons, London), pp. 98-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker and Schmidt: 1998, Washington Post.

  • Baumeister, R. F.: 1996, Evil Inside Human Cruelty and Violence (W. H. Freeman and Company, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J. and T. M. Tripp: 1998, 'Revenge in Organizations: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly', in R. W. Griffin, A. O'Leary-Kelley and J. M. Collins (eds.), Dysfunctional Behavior in Organizations: Non-Violent Dysfunctional Behavior (JAI Press, Stamford), pp. 49-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, S.: 1989, Lying (Random House, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R. M. and T. D. Feehan: 1977, 'The Intent to Deceive', The Journal of Philosophy 74(3) (March), 143-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, L. and P. Kay: 1981, 'Prototype Semantics', Language 57(1), 26-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch, L. L. and W. H. Jones: 1997, 'Measuring Levels of Trust', Journal of Research in Personality 31(3), 319-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., J. A. Epstein and M. M. Wyer: 1993, 'Sex Differences in Lying', in Michael Lewis and Carolyn Saarni (ed.), Lying and Deception in Everyday Life (Guilford Press, Guilford Publications Inc., New York, U.S.A.), pp. 126-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., J. I. Stone and G. D. Lassiter: 1985, 'Deceiving and Detecting Deceit', in B. R. Schlenker (ed.), The Self and Social Life (McGraw-Hill, New York), pp. 323-370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and L. E. Preston: 1995, 'The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications', Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P.: 1988, 'Lying and Nonverbal Behavior: Theoretical Issues and New Findings', Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 12(3) (Fall), 163-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P.: 1992, Telling Lies (W.W. Norton & Company, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. and M. G. Frank: 1993, 'Lies That Fail', in Michael Lewis and Carolyn Saarni (ed.), Lying and Deception in Everyday Life (Guilford Press, Guilford Publications, Inc., New York, USA), pp. 184-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. and M. O'Sullivan: 1991, 'Who Can Catch a Liar?', American Psychologist 46(9) (September), 913-920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elangovan, A. R. and D. L. Shapiro: 1998, 'Betrayal of Trust in Organizations', Academy of Management Review 23(3), 547-566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elm, D. R. and J. D. Teplensky: 1998, 'Three Faces of Honesty: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis', in J. Post (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance (JAI, Greenwich, CT), pp. 107-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J.: 1997, 'A Social Influence Model of Employee Theft: Beyond the Fraud Triangle', in R. J. Lewicki, R. J. Bies and B. H. Sheppard (eds.), Research on Negotiation in Organizations (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 29-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. and K. S. Scott: 1996, 'Why Do Workers Bite the Hands That Feed Them? Employee Theft as a Social Exchange Process', Research in Organizational Behavior 18, 111-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, S. L.: 1993, 'Lying, Deceit, and Subterfuge: A Model of Dishonesty in the Workplace. Focused Issue: The Legalistic Organization', Organization Science 4(3) (August), 478-495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F.: 1958, The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, R. C. and J. P. Clark: 1983, Theft by Employees (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.: 1993, Moral Imagination (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1991, 'Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue Contingent Model', Academy of Management Review 16(2), 366-395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. and L. V. Ryan: 1997, 'The Link Between Ethical Judgment and Action in Organizations: A Moral Approbation Approach', Organization Science 8(6) (November-December), 663-680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G.: 1993, 'The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor', in A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J.: 1983, 'Lying and Deception A Behavioral Model', in M. H. Bazerman and R. J. Lewicki (eds.), Negotiating in Organizations (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), pp. 68-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., T. Poland, J. W. Minton and B. H. Sheppard: 1997, 'Dishonesty as Deviance: A Typology of Workplace Dishonesty and Contributing Factors', Research on Negoatiation in Organizations 6, 53-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J. and R. J. Robinson: 1998, 'Ethical and Unethical Bargaining Tactics: An Empirical Study', Journal of Business Ethics 17, 665-682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J. and N. Stark: 1996, 'What is Ethically Appropriate in Negotiations: An Empirical Examination of Bargaining Tactics', Social Justice Research 9(1), 69-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, R. A. and P. J. Lavrakas: 1976, 'Lying Behavior and Evaluation of Lies', Perceptual and Motor Skills 42, 575-581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. J., J. H. Davis and F. D. Schoorman: 1995, 'An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust', Academy of Management Review 20, 709-734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. R. and S. L. Lee: 1994, 'Personality Variables Related to Integrity Test Scores: The Role of Conscientiousness', Journal of Business & Psychology 8(4) (Summer), 413-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W. T. and D. C. Robertson: 2000, 'Lying: The Impact of Decision Context', Business Ethics Quarterly 10(2) (April), 409-440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, E. D. and K. A. Jehn: 1999, 'Ranking Rank Behaviors: A Comprehensive Situation-Based Definition of Dishonesty', Business and Society 38(3) (September), 299-328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. L.: 1991, 'The Effects of Explanations on Negative Reactions to Deceit', Administrative Science Quarterly 36(4) (December), 614-630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. L., R. J. Lewicki and P. Devine: 1995, 'When Do Employees Choose Deceptive Tactics to Stop Unwanted Organizational Change?: A Relational Perspective', in R. J. Bies, Lewicki Roy J. and B. H. Sheppard (eds.), Research on Negotiation in Organizations (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 155-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R.: 1985, 'The Excuse: An Amazing Grace?', in B. R. Schlenker (ed.), The Self and Social Life (McGraw Hill, New York), pp. 235-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetser, E. E.: 1992, 'The Definition of Lie An Examination of the Folk Models Underlying a Semantic Prototype', in N. Quinn and D. Holland (eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 43-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. and D.: Matza: 1957, 'Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency', American Sociological Review 22, 640-670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K.: 1986, 'Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model', Academy of Management Review 11(3), 601-617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, B. and J. B. Cullen: 1988, 'The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates', Administrative Science Quarterly 33, 101-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P.: 1999, Moral Imagination and Management Decision-Making (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scott, E.D., Jehn, K.A. Multiple Stakeholder Judgments of Employee Behaviors: A Contingent Prototype Model of Dishonesty. Journal of Business Ethics 46, 235–250 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025529504435

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025529504435

Keywords

Navigation