Skip to main content
Log in

The predictive accuracy of population viability analysis: a test using data from two small mammal species in a fragmented landscape

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the predictive accuracy of the population viability analysis package, ALEX (Analysis of the Likelihood of EXtinction). ALEX was used to predict the probability of patch occupancy for two species of small native Australian mammals (Antechinus agilis and Rattus fuscipes) among 13 patches of suitable habitat in a matrix of plantation pines (Pinus radiata). The study was retrospective, running each simulation from 1900 until 1997, and the model parameterised without knowledge of the 1997 observed field data of patch occupancy. Predictions were made over eight scenarios for each species, allowing for variation in the amount of dispersal between patches, level of environmental stochasticity, and size of habitat patches. Predicted occupancies were compared to the 1997 field data of patch occupancy using logistic regression, testing H random, that there was no relationship between observed and predicted occupancy, and H perfect, that there was a perfect, 1:1 relationship between observed and predicted occupancies. Rejection of H random and failure to reject H perfect was taken as a good match between observed and predicted occupancies. Such a match was found for one scenario with R. fuscipes, and no scenarios with A. agilis. In general, patch occupancy was underestimated, with field surveys finding that 9 of the 13 patches were occupied by R. fuscipes and 10 by A. agilis. Nonetheless, PVA predictions were in the ‘right direction’, whereby patches predicted to have a high probability of occupancy were generally occupied, and vice versa. A post hoc search over additional scenarios found few scenarios with a better match than the original eight. The results of this study support the notion that PVA is best thought of as a relative, rather than absolute predictor of the consequences of management actions in threatened populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett J.L., How R.A. and Humphreys W.F. 1977. Small mammal populations in pine and native forests in north-eastern New South Wales. Australian Wildlife Research 4: 233-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger S.R. and Westphal M.I. 1998. On the use of demographic models of population viability in endangered species management. Journal of Wildlife Management 62: 821-841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett A.F. 1987. Conservation of mammals within a fragmented forest environment: the contributions of insular biogeography and autecology. In: Saunders D.A., Arnold G.W., Burbidge A.A. and Hopkins A.J.M. (eds), Nature Conservation: the Role of Remnants of Native Vegetation. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Sydney, Australia, pp. 41-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce M.S. 1992. Population viability analysis. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23: 481-506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook B.W., O'Grady J.J., Chapman A.P., Burgman M.A., Akcakaya H.R. and Frankham R. 1982. Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology. Nature 404: 385-387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn A. 1994. Adaptive sex allocation by brood reduction in antechinuses. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 35: 53-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn A., Lee A.K. and Martin R.W. 1983. Macrogeographic variation in litter size in Antechinus (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae). Evolution 37: 86-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn A., Scott M.P. and Scotts D.J. 1985. Inbreeding avoidance and male-biased dispersal in Antechinus spp. (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae). Animal Behaviour 33: 908-915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day J.R. and Possingham H.P. 1995. A stochastic metapopulation model with variability in patch size and position. Theoretical Population Biology 48: 333-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickman C.R. 1980. Ecological studies of Antechinus stuartii and Antechinus flavipes (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae) in open-forest and woodland habitats. Australian Zoologist 20: 433-446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickman C.R. 1989. Demographic responses of Antechinus stuartii (Marsupialia) to supplementary food. Australian Journal of Ecology 14: 387-398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickman C.R., King D.H., Adams M. and Baverstock P.R. 1988. Electrophoretic identification of a new species of Antechinus (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae) in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology 36: 455-463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickman C.R., Parnaby H.E., Crowther M.S. and King D.H. 1998. Antechinus agilis (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae), a new species from the A. stuartii complex in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology 46: 1-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunstan C.E. and Fox B.J. 1996. The effects of fragmentation and disturbance of rainforest on ground-dwelling small mammals on the Robertson Plateau, New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Biogeography 23: 187-201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding A.H. and Bell J.F. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence / absence models. Environmental Conservation 24: 38-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction: island populations. Conservation Biology 12: 665-675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaona P., Ferreras P. and Delibes M. 1998. Dynamics and viability of a metapopulation of the endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). Ecological Monographs 68: 349-370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldingay R. and Possingham H. 1995. Area requirements for viable populations of the Australian gliding marsupial Petaurus australis. Biological Conservation 73: 161-167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood P.J. 1980. Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Animal Behaviour 28: 1140-1162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton S. and Moller H. 1995. Can PVA models using computer packages offer useful conservation advice? Sooty shearwaters Puffinus griseus in New Zealand as a case study. Biological Conservation 73: 107-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick P.W. and Kalinowski S.T. 2000. Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 139-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner B.E. and Taylor J.M. 1965. Systematic relationships among Rattus in southern Australia: evidence from cross-breeding experiments. Wildlife Research 10: 101-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy R.C. 1993. VORTEX: a computer simulation model for population viability analysis. Wildlife Research 20: 45-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer D.B., Burgman M.A., Akcakaya H.R., Lacy R.C. and Possingham H.P. 1995. A review of the generic computer programs ALEX, RAMAS/ space and VORTEX for modelling the viability of wildlife metapopulations. Ecological Modelling 82: 161-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer D.B. and Lacy R.C. 2002. Small mammals, habitat patches and PVA models: a field test of model predictive ability. Biological Conservation 103: 247-265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer D.B. and Possingham H.P. 1995. The conservation of arboreal marsupials in the montane ash forests of the central highlands of Victoria, south-eastern Australia-VII. Modelling the persistence of leadbeater's possum in response to modified timber harvesting practices. Biological Conservation 73: 239-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer D.B., Lacy R.C. and Pope M.L. 2000. Testing a simulation model for population viability analysis. Ecological Applications 10: 580-597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer D.B., McCarthy M.A., Possingham H.P. and Legge S. 2001. A simple landscape-scale test of a spatially explicit population model: patch occupancy in fragmented south-eastern Australian forests. Oikos 92: 445-458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manel S., Williams H.C. and Ormerod S.J. 2001. Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 921-931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmontel M., Humphrey S.R. and O'Shea T.J. 1997. Population viability analysis of the Florida manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris), 1976-1991. Conservation Biology 11: 467-481.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy M.A., Lindenmayer D.B. and Possingham H.P. 2000. Testing spatial PVA models of Australian treecreepers (Aves: Climacteridae) in fragmented forest. Ecological Applications 10: 1722-1731.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy M.A., Lindenmayer D.B. and Possingham H.P. 2001a. Assessing spatial PVA models of arboreal marsupials using significance tests and Bayesian statistics. Biological Conservation 98: 191-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy M.A., Possingham H.P., Day J.R. and Tyre A.J. 2001b. Testing the accuracy of population viability analysis. Conservation Biology 15: 1030-1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce J. and Ferrier S. 2000. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecological Modelling 133: 225-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Possingham H.P. and Davies I. 1995. ALEX: a model for the viability analysis of spatially structured populations. Biological Conservation 73: 143-150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Possingham H.P., Lindenmayer D.B., Norton T.W. and Davies I. 1994. Metapopulation viability analysis of the greater glider Petauroides volans in a wood production area. Biological Conservation 70: 227-236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press A.J. 1987. Comparison of the demography of populations of Rattus fuscipes living in cool temperate rainforests and dry sclerophyll forests. Australian Wildlife Research 14: 45-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson A.C. 1987. The ecology of the bush rat, Rattus fuscipes (Rodentia: Muridae), in Sherbrooke Forest, Victoria. Australian Mammalogy 11: 35-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart A.P. 1979. Trapping success in relation to trap placement with three species of small mammals, Rattus fuscipes, Antechinus swainsonii and A. stuartii. Australian Wildlife Research 6: 165-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahan R. 1995. The Mammals of Australia. 2nd edn. New Holland Publishers, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suckling G.C. and Heislers A. 1978. Populations of four small mammals in radiata pine plantations and eucalypt forest of north-eastern Victoria. Australian Wildlife Research 5: 305-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland D.R. and Predavec M. 1999. The effects of moonlight on microhabitat use by Antechinus agilis (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae). Australian Journal of Zoology 47: 1-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor J.M. 1961. Reproductive biology of the Australian bush rat Rattus assimilis. University of California Publications in Zoology 60: 1-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warneke R.M. 1971. Field study of the bush rat (Rattus fuscipes). Wildlife Contributions, Victoria, No.14.

  • Wilson B.A., Bourne A.R. and Jessop R.E. 1986. Ecology of small mammals in coastal heathland at Anglesea, Victoria. Australian Wildlife Research 13: 397-406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood D.H. 1970. An ecological study of Antechinus stuartii (Marsupialia) in a south-east Queensland rain forest. Australian Journal of Zoology 18: 185-207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood D.H. 1971. The ecology of Rattus fuscipes and Melomys cervinipes (Rodentia: Muridae) in a south-east Queensland rain forest. Australian Journal of Zoology 19: 371-392.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen J. Ball.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ball, S.J., Lindenmayer, D.B. & Possingham, H.P. The predictive accuracy of population viability analysis: a test using data from two small mammal species in a fragmented landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 2393–2413 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025821506931

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025821506931

Navigation