Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cannibalism among phytoseiid mites: a review

  • Published:
Experimental & Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cannibalism, the killing and consumption of conspecific individuals, is a common and widespread phenomenon in the animal kingdom. Cannibalism in phytoseiid mites has been known for decades but until recently reports were mainly observational and experimental data were lacking. Recently, diverse aspects of cannibalism, such as life stage-related cannibalism and preference, nutritional benefits, the role of diet specialization, species discrimination, and kin discrimination were assessed and compared within and among diverse phytoseiid species. As a result, species of the family Phytoseiidae provide a rather well studied group with respect to cannibalism at the individual level. The present review aims at summarizing and canalizing the wealth of recent experimental data on cannibalistic phytoseiid mites and seeks to emphasize and discuss the behavioral and ecological significance of cannibalism. In an ideal case, it will stimulate studies on topics related to cannibalism that are currently underrepresented such as the consequences of cannibalism for population dynamics and species composition in a given habitat. Partitioned in six sections, the key determinants of cannibalism in phytoseiid mites are treated by extracting features that are common among species and, where applicable, by indicating the circumstances that minimize the costs and maximize the benefits of cannibalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blackwood J.S., Schausberger P. and Croft B.A. 2001a. Prey stage preference in generalist and specialist phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) when offered Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) eggs and larvae. Environ. Entomol. 30: 1103–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwood J.S., Croft B.A. and Schausberger P. 2001b. Jerking in predaceous mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) with emphasis on larvae. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 25: 475–492.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein A.R. and O'Hara R.K. 1986. Kin recognition in tadpoles. Sci. Am. 254: 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castagnoli M., Liguori M. and Simoni S. 2002. Interspecific predation and cannibalism in four phytoseiid species of the Mediterranean area (Acari: Phytoseiidae). In: Bernini F., Nannelli R., Nuzzaci G. and de Lillo E. (eds), Acarid Phylogeny and Evolution: Adaptation in Mites and Ticks. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 341–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft M.B. and Croft B.A. 1993. Larval survival and feeding by immature Metaseiulus occidentalis, Neoseiulus fallacis, Amblyseius andersoni and Typhlodromus pyri on life stage groups of Tetranychus urticae Koch and phytoseiid larvae. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 17: 685–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croft B.A. and Croft M.B. 1996. Intra-and interspecific predation among adult female phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae): effects on survival and reproduction. Environ. Entomol. 25: 853–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft B.A. and MacRae I.V. 1992. Biological control of apple mites by mixed populations of Metaseiulus occidentalis (Nesbitt) and Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten (Acari, Phytoseiidae). Environ. Entomol. 21: 202–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft B.A. and McMurtry J. 1972. Comparative studies of four strains of Typhlodromus occidentalis Nesbitt (Acarina. Phytoseiidae) VI. Life history studies. Acarologia 13: 460–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft B.A. and Zhang Z.-Q. 1994. Walking, feeding and intraspecific interaction of larvae of Metaseiulus occidentalis, Typhlodromus pyri, Neoseiulus fallacis and Amblyseius andersoni held with and without eggs of Tetranychus urticae. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 18: 567–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croft B.A., Kim S.S. and Kim D.I. 1995. Absorption and cannibalism: do phytoseiids conserve egg resources when prey densities decline rapidly? Exp. Appl. Acarol. 19: 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croft B.A., Kim S.S. and Kim D.I. 1996. Intra-and interspecific predation by Metaseiulus occidentalis, Typhlodromus pyri, Neoseiulus fallacis and Amblyseius andersoni on different life stages: effects on survival, oviposition and activity. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 20: 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croft B.A., Luh H.K. and Schausberger P. 1999. Larval size relative to larval feeding, cannibalism on larvae, egg size or adult female size and larval-adult setae patterns among 13 phytoseiid mite species. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 23: 599–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croft B.A., MacRae I.V. and Currans K.G. 1992. Factors affecting biological control of apple mites by mixed populations of Metaseiulus occidentalis and Typhlodromus pyri. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 14: 343–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croft B.A., Monetti L.N. and Pratt P.D. 1998. Comparative life histories and predation types: Are Neoseiulus californicus and N. fallacis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) similar type II selective predators of spider mites? Environ. Entomol. 27: 531–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong Q. and Polis G.A. 1992. The dynamics of cannibalistic populations: a foraging perspective. In: Elgar M.A. and Crespi B.J. (eds), Cannibalism: Ecology and Evolution Among Diverse Taxa. Oxford University Press, UK, pp. 13–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosse G. 1958. Ñber einige neue Raubmilbenarten (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Pflanzenschutzberichte 21: 44–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duso C. and Vettorazzo E. 1999. Mite population dynamics on different grape varieties with or without phytoseiids released (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 23: 741–763.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehler L.E. 1990. Introduction strategies in biological control of insects. In: Mackauer M., Ehler L.E. and Roland J. (eds), Critical Issues in Biological Control. Intercept, Andover, UK, pp. 11–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgar M.A. and Crespi B.J. (eds) 1992a. Cannibalism: Ecology and Evolution Among Diverse Taxa. Oxford University Press, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgar M.A. and Crespi B.J. 1992b. Ecology and evolution of cannibalism. In: Elgar M.A. and Crespi B.J. (eds), Cannibalism: Ecology and Evolution Among Diverse Taxa. Oxford University Press, UK, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraji F. 2001. How Counter-Attacking Prey Influence Foraging and Oviposition Decisions of a Predatory Mite. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraji F., Janssen A., van Rijn P.C.J. and Sabelis M.W. 2000. Kin recognition by the predatory mite Iphiseius degenerans: discrimination among own, conspecific, and heterospecific eggs. Ecol. Entomol. 25: 147–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faraji F., Janssen A. and Sabelis M.W. 2002. The benefits of clustering eggs: the role of egg predation and larval cannibalism in a predatory mite. Oecologia 131: 20–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellowes M.D.E. 1998. Do non-social insects get the (kin) recognition they deserve? Ecol. Entomol. 23: 223–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox L.R. 1975. Cannibalism in natural populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 6: 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton W.D. 1964a. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J. Theor. Biol. 7: 1–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton W.D. 1964b. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J. Theor. Biol. 7: 17–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helle W. and Sabelis M.W. 1985. Spider Mites. Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostiainen T. and Hoy M.A. 1994. Egg-harvesting allows large scale rearing of Amblyseius finlandicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in the laboratory. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 18: 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostiainen T. and Hoy M.A. 1996. The Phytoseiidae as Biological Control Agents of Mites and Insects. A Bibliography. Monograph 17, Department of Entomology and Nematology. IFAS, University of Florida, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing J.E. 1969. Life history and life table of Metaseiulus occidentalis. Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. 62: 978–982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist E.E., Sabelis M.W. and Bruin J. 1996. Eriophyoid Mites. Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann K., Hastings A. and Huxel G.R. 1998. Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature 395: 794–798.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacRae I.V. and Croft B.A. 1993. Influence of temperature on interspecific predation and cannibalism by Metaseiulus occidentalis and Typhlodromus pyri (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Environ. Entomol. 22: 770–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRae I.V. and Croft B.A. 1997. Intra-and interspecific predation by adult female Metaseiulus occidentalis and Typhlodromus pyri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) when provisioned with varying densities and ratios of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) and phytoseiid larvae. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 21: 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry J.A. and Croft B.A. 1997. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 42: 291–321.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry J.A. and Rodriguez J.G. 1987. Nutritional ecology of phytoseiid mites. In: Slansky F. and Rodriguez J.G. (eds), Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites and Spiders. Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 609–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monetti L.N. and Croft B.A. 1997. Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) and Neoseiulus fallacis (Garman): larval responses to prey and humidity, nymphal feeding drive and nymphal predation on phytoseiid eggs. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 21: 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palevsky E., Reuveny H., Okonis O. and Gerson U. 1999. Comparative behavioural studies of larval and adult stages of the phytoseiids (Acari: Mesostigmata) Typhlodromus athiasae and Neoseiulus californicus. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 23: 467–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrella M.P., Hansen L.S. and van Lenteren J. 1999. Glasshouse environments. In: Bellows T.S. and Fisher T.W. (eds), Handbook of Biological Control. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 819–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pels B. and Sabelis M.W. 1999. Local dynamics, overexploitation and predator dispersal. Oikos 86: 573–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pels B., Claessen D. and de Roos A.M. 2001. Eat it or beat it: evolution of cannibalism and predator dispersal in a spatially structured population. In: Pels B. Evolutionary Dynamics of Dispersal in Predatory Mites, Chapter 6. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfennig D.W., Ho S.G. and Hoffman E.A. 1998. Pathogen transmission as a selective force against cannibalism. Anim. Behav. 55: 1255–1261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfennig D.W. 1997. Kinship and cannibalism. BioScience 47: 667–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polis G.A. 1981. The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12: 225–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polis G.A., Myers C.A. and Holt R.D. 1989. The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 297–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt P.D., Schausberger P. and Croft B.A. 1999. Prey-food types of Neoseiulus fallacis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and literature versus experimentally derived prey-food estimates for five phytoseiid species. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 23: 551–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenheim J.A., Kaya H.K., Ehler L.E., Marois J.J. and Jaffee B.A. 1995. Intraguild predation among biological-control agents: theory and evidence. Biol. Cont. 5: 303–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis M.W. 1981. Biological Control of Two-Spotted Spider Mites Using Phytoseiid Predators, Part I. Modelling the Predator-Prey Interaction at the Individual Level. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis M.W. and Janssen A. 1994. Evolution of life-history patterns in the Phytoseiidae. In: Houck M.A. (ed.), Mites: Ecological and Evolutionary Analyses of Life History Patterns. Chapman and Hall, London, UK, pp. 70–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis M.W. and van Rijn P.C.J. 1997. Predation by insects and mites. In: Lewis T. (ed.), Thrips as Crop Pests. CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 259–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P. 1997. Inter-and intraspecific predation on immatures by adult females in Euseius finlandicus, Typhlodromus pyri and Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 21: 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P. 1999a. Predation preference of Typhlodromus pyri and Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari, Phytoseiidae) when offered con-and heterospecific immature life stages. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 23: 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P. 1999b. Juvenile survival and development in Euseius finlandicus, Typhlodromus pyri and Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari, Phytoseiidae) feeding on con-and heterospecific immatures. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 23: 297–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P. and Croft B.A. 1999a. Activity, feeding, and development among larvae of specialist and generalist phytoseiid mite species (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environ. Entomol. 28: 322–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P. and Croft B.A. 1999b. Predation on and discrimination between con-and heterospecific eggs among specialist and generalist phytoseiid mite species (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environ. Entomol. 28: 523–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P. and Croft B.A. 2000a. Cannibalism and intraguild predation among phytoseiid mites: are aggressiveness and prey preference related to diet specialization? Exp. Appl. Acarol. 24: 709–725.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P. and Croft B.A. 2000b. Nutritional benefits of intraguild predation and cannibalism among generalist and specialist predaceous mites. Ecol. Entomol. 25: 473–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P. and Croft B.A. 2001. Kin recognition and larval cannibalism by adult females in specialist predaceous mites. Anim. Behav. 61: 459–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P. and Walzer A. 2001. Combined versus single species release of predaceous mites: predator-predator interactions and pest suppression. Biol. Control 20: 269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens L. 1992. Cannibalism in beetles. In: Elgar M.A. and Crespi B.J. (eds), Cannibalism: Ecology and Evolution Among Diverse Taxa. Oxford University Press, UK, pp. 156–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland K.D., Axelsen J.A., Dromph K., Freier B., Hemptinne J.-L., Holst N.N. et al. 1997. Pest control by a community of natural enemies. Acta Jutlandica 72: 271–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanigoshi L.K. 1982. Advances in knowledge of the Phytoseiidae. In: Hoy M.A. (ed.), Recent Advances in Knowledge of the Phytoseiidae. Div. Agric. Sci. Spec. Publ. 3284. University of California, Berkeley, USA, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walde S.J., Nyrop J.P. and Hardman J.M. 1992. Dynamics of Panonychus ulmi and Typhlodromus pyri: factors contributing to persistence. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 14: 261–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer A. and Schausberger P. 1999a. Cannibalism and interspecific predation in the phytoseiid mites Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus: predation rates and effects on reproduction and juvenile development. BioControl 43: 457–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer A. and Schausberger P. 1999b. Predation preferences and discrimination between con-and heterospecific prey by the phytoseiid mites Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus. BioControl 43: 469–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer A., Blümel S. and Schausberger P. 2001. Population dynamics of interacting predatory mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus, held on detached bean leaves. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 25: 731–743.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yao D.S. and Chant D.A. 1989. Population growth and predation interference between two species of predatory phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiiidae) in interactive systems. Oecologia 80: 443–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z.Q. and Croft B.A. 1994. A comparative life history study of immature Amblyseius fallacis, Amblyseius andersoni, Typhlodromus occidentalis and Typhlodromus pyri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) with a review of larval feeding patterns in the family. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 18: 635–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z.Q. and Croft B.A. 1995. Intraspecific competition in immature Amblyseius fallacis, Amblyseius andersoni, Typhlodromus occidentalis and Typhlodromus pyri (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 19: 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Plant Protection, University of Natural Resources & Applied Life Sciences, Peter Jordanstrasse 82, Vienna, A-1190, Austria

    Peter Schausberger

Authors
  1. Peter Schausberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schausberger, P. Cannibalism among phytoseiid mites: a review. Exp Appl Acarol 29, 173–191 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025839206394

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025839206394

Search

Navigation