Abstract
Ordinary markets allow parties, not the state, to value property and projects. But they do not account for subjective value in such traditional contexts as condemnation. An awareness of these nonmarket values helps overcome any categorical opposition to the use of the contingent valuation method (CVM) to value cultural and environmental resources. But accurate CVM should measure all values, positive or negative, tononowners; it should apply generally to any substitute projects; and it should seek to account for diminishing marginal value of additional resource units. CVM should be used only to aggregate nonmarket preferences, not to skew the political debate to cultural or environmental objectives.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ciriacy-Wantrup, S.V. (1947) “Capital Returns from Soil-Conservation Practices”. Journal of Farm Economics 29: 1181–1196.
Diamond, Peter and Hausman, Jerry (1994) “Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better Than No Number”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4): 45–64.
Epstein, Richard A. (2002) “The Ebbs and Flows in Takings Law: Reflections on the Lake Tahoe Case”. Cato Supreme Court Review 1: 5.
Epstein, Richard A. (1985) Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Haneman, Michael (1994) “Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4): 19–43.
Hayek, Friedrich (1945) “The Uses of Knowledge in Society”. American Economic Review 35(4): 519–530.
Olson, Mancur (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Radin, Margaret Jane (1988) “The Liberal Conception of Property: Cross Currents in the Jurisprudence of Takings”. Columbia Law Review 88: 1667–1678.
Samples, Karl C. and Hollyer, James R. (1990) “Contingent Valuation of Wildlife Resources in the Presence of Substitutes and Complements”, in Rebecca L. Johnson and Gary V. Johnson (eds.), Economic Valuation of Natural Resources: Issues, Theory and Applications. Westview Press, Boulder, 177–192.
Schuster, J. Mark, de Monchaux, John, and Riley, Charles A. II (eds.) (1997) Preserving the Built Heritage: Tools for Implementation. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Tolley, George S. et al. (1983) “Establishing and Valuing the Effects of Improved Visibility in the Eastern United States”, in Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Epstein, R.A. The Regrettable Necessity of Contingent Valuation. Journal of Cultural Economics 27, 259–274 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026375220210
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026375220210