Skip to main content
Log in

A simple system for monitoring biodiversity in protected areas of a developing country

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The achievements of initiatives to strengthen biodiversity conservation in developing countries may be difficult to assess, since most countries have no system for monitoring biodiversity. This paper describes a simple and cost-effective, field-based biodiversity monitoring system developed specifically for areas where ‘specialist staff’ is lacking. We discuss the preliminary lessons learned from protected areas in the Philippines. Whilst the monitoring system aims to identify trends in biodiversity and its uses so as to guide management action, it also promotes the participation of local people in the management, stimulates discussions about conservation amongst stakeholders and builds the capacity of park staff and communities in management skills. In addition, it seeks to provide people with direction regarding the aims of protected areas, and reinforces the consolidation of existing livelihoods through strengthening community-based resource management systems. The field methods are: (1) standardised recording of routine observations, (2) fixed point photographing, (3) line transect survey, and (4) focus group discussion. Both bio-physical and socio-economic data are used and given equal importance. The system can be sustained using locally available resources. The approach is useful in countries embarking on shared management of park resources with local communities, where rural people depend on use of natural ecosystems, and where the economic resources for park management are limited. We hope this paper will encourage other countries to develop their own biodiversity monitoring system, letting its development become a means for capacity building whilst at the same time supporting the creation of ownership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alder D and Synnott TJ (1992) Permanent sample plot techniques for mixed tropical forest. Tropical Forestry Papers 25: 1–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibby CJ, Burgess ND and Hill DA (1992) Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesen J and Lafontaine A (1998) Indicators and monitoring of capacity development in environment initiatives. In: Danida and DANCED International Workshop on Danish Assistance to Capacity Development in Environment, Snekkersten, Denmark 12–14 May 1998, Workshop Proceedings, pp 96–130. Danida and DANCED, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown D (1998) Participatory biodiversity conservation rethinking the strategy in the low tourist potential areas of tropical Africa. ODI Natural Resource Perspectives 33: 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown M and Wyckoff-Baird B (1992) Designing Integrated Conservation and Development Projects. Biodiversity Support Program. WWF, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP and Laake JL (1993) Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP and Anderson DR (1984) The need for distance data in transect counts. Journal of Wildlife Management 48: 1248–1254

    Google Scholar 

  • Coddington JA, Griswold CE, Dávila DS, Pe ñaranda E and Larcher SF (1991) Designing and testing sampling protocols to estimate biodiversity in tropical ecosystems. In: Dudley EC (ed) The Unity of Evolutionary Biology: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, pp 44–60. Dioscorides Press, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmeier F and Comiskey JA (eds) (1998) Forest Biodiversity Research, Monitoring and Modeling: Conceptual Background and Old World Case Studies. Parthenon Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen F and Enghoff M (1999) Fredet natur-mellem udnyttelse og beskyttelse. Den Ny Verden 32 (4): 74–81

    Google Scholar 

  • DENR (1992) National Integrated Protected Area System Act R.A. No. 7586 and Implementing Rules and Regulations DAO 25, Series of 1992. DENR, PAWB, Manila

    Google Scholar 

  • DENR (1998) Medium Term Development Plan for the Protected Area and Wildlife Sector of DENR 1999–2004. DENR, Quezon City, Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  • DENR and UNEP (1997) Philippine Biodiversity. An Assessment and Action Plan. Bookmark, Inc., Makati City, Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller J (1998) Participatory monitoring of forest resources: current methodologies being developed in Thailand. Rural Development Forestry Network 23e: 23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrodette T (1987) A power analysis for detecting trends. Ecology 68: 1364–1372

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrodette T (1991) Models for power of detecting trends-a reply to Link and Hatfield. Ecology 72: 1889–1892

    Google Scholar 

  • Groombridge B (ed) (1992) Global Biodiversity. Status of the Earth's Living Resources. World Conservation Monitoring Center. Chapman and Hall, London

  • Groombridge B and Jenkins MD (eds) (1996) Assessing Biodiversity Status and Sustainability. WCMC Biodiversity Series No. 5. World Conservation Press, Cambridge

  • Harmon D (1994) Coordinating Research andManagement to Enhance Protected Areas. IUCN, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond A, Adriaanse A, Rodenburg E, Bryant D and Woodward R (1995) Environmental Indicators: A Systematic Approach to Measuring and Reporting on Environmental Policy Performance in the Context of Sustainable Development. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellier A, Newton AC and Gaona SO (1999) Use of indigenous knowledge for rapidly assessing trends in biodiversity: a case study from Chiapas, Mexico. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 869–889

    Google Scholar 

  • IBAMA (1998) International Workshop on Biodiversity Monitoring in Federal Protected Areas: Observations and General Remarks. www.erols.com/dsbaker/

  • IUCN (1996) 1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN, Gland

  • Kremen C, Merenlender AM and Murphy DD (1994) Ecological monitoring: a vital need for integrated conservation and development programs in the tropics. Conservation Biology 8: 388–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C, Raymond I and Lance K (1998) An interdisciplinary tool for monitoring conservation impacts in Madagascar. Conservation Biology 12: 549–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Laake JL, Buckland ST, Anderson DR and Burnham KP (1993) Distance User's Guide, v. 2.0. Colorado Cooperation of Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Colorado State University, Fort Collins

  • Margules CR, Austin MP, Davies KF, Meyers JA and Nicholls AO (1998) The design of programs to monitor forest biodiversity: lessons from theWogWog habitat fragmentation experiment. In: Dallmeier F and Comiskey JA (eds) Forest Biodiversity Research, Monitoring and Modelling: Conceptual Background and Old World Case Studies, pp 183–196. Parthenon Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Margoulis R and Salafsky N (1998) Measures of Success: A Systematic Approach to Designing, Managing and Monitoring Community-Oriented Conservation Projects. Adaptive Management Series, Biodiversity Support Program, Washington

  • Nordeco and DENR (1998a) Biodiversity Monitoring System Manual. DENR, Manila; Nordeco, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordeco and DENR (1998b) Integrating Conservation and Development in Protected Area Management in Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park, the Philippines. DENR, Manila; Nordeco, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordeco and DENR (1998c) Integrating Conservation and Development in Protected Area Management in Bataan Natural Park, the Philippines. DENR, Manila; Nordeco, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordeco and DENR (1998d) Integrating Conservation and Development in Protected Area Management in Mt. Kitanglad Range Natural Park, the Philippines. DENR, Manila; Nordeco, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF (1990) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology 4: 355–364

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD/DAC (1997) Capacity Development in Environment: Proceedings of a Workshop held in Rome, Italy, 4–6 December, 1996. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • PAWB-DENR (1998) The First Philippine National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity. PAWB-DENR, Quezon City, Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollisco-Botengan MA (1997) CPPAP Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Framework. DENR and NIPA, Inc., Manila

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollisco W, Danielsen F, Nozawa C, Jensen A and Balete D (1997) Proceedings of Workshop on Monitoring Biodiversity in Protected Areas of the Philippines. SYLVATROP The Technical Journal of Philippine Ecosystems and Natural Resources 7: 101–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Saberwal VK and Kothari A (1996) The human dimension in conservation biology curricula in developing countries. Conservation Biology 10: 1328–1331

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaik CP van, Terborgh T and Dugelby B (1997) The silent crisis: the state of rain forest nature preserves. In: Kramer R, Schaik CP van and Johnson J (eds) Last Stand: Protected Areas & the Defense of Tropical Biodiversity. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1998) Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management pass é in the landscape era? Biological Conservation 83: 247–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson WL, White GC and Gowan C (1998) Monitoring Vertebrate Populations. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Vora RS (1997) Developing programs to monitor ecosystem health and effectiveness of management practices on Lakes States National Forests, USA. Biological Conservation 80: 289–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Wangwacharakul V, Claridge G and Mather R (1996) Biodiversity Monitoring and Evaluation in the Lao PDR: Developing a Protected Area Approach. MIDAS Agronomics Co. Ltd., Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber FR (1990) Preliminary Indicators for Monitoring Changes in the Natural Resource Base. A.I.D. Program Design Evaluation Methodology No. 14. USAID, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells MP (1998) Institutions and incentives for biodiversity conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 815–835

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JG (1994) The Role of Bio-indicators in Estuarine Management. Estuaries 17: 94–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DE, Cole FR, Nichols JD, Rudran R and Foster MS (eds) (1996) Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity. Standard Methods for Mammals. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London

  • World Bank (1992) Guidelines for Monitoring and Evaluation of GEF Biodiversity Projects. The World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1998) Guidelines for Monitoring and Evaluation for Biodiversity Projects. Environment Department Note No. 65. The World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • WRI, UNEP, UNDP and WB (1998) World Resources 1998–99, pp 320–321. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Danielsen, F., Balete, D.S., Poulsen, M.K. et al. A simple system for monitoring biodiversity in protected areas of a developing country. Biodiversity and Conservation 9, 1671–1705 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026505324342

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026505324342

Navigation