Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Pottery to Politics: An Ethnoarchaeological Study of Political Factionalism, Ethnicity, and Domestic Pottery Style in the Ecuadorian Amazon

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A long-standing assumption in archaeological theory is that pottery in the domestic context represents a form of “passive style” that does not enter into symbolic communication in the political domain. This paper presents ethnoarchaeological data to establish a link between women's active political behavior and pottery style in the domestic context in a small-scale, segmental society in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Analysis of individual variables of style shows that Achuar and Quichua women signify their political alliances in the painted decoration of their domestic pottery more strongly than they signify so-called “passive” processes of learning associated with early enculturation and ethnicity. Furthermore, analysis of women's judgments of pottery as Achuar or Quichua indicates that they decode cues to political alliances in the pottery of other women, including cues to political differences within and between groups. The theoretical implications of these findings are discussed in terms of the principles underlying women's stylistic behavior as part of the political processes involved in the construction and maintenance of social identity and social boundaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES CITED

  • Attwood, D.W. (1974). Patrons and mobilizers: Political entrepreneurs in an agrarian state. Journal of Anthropological Research 30(4): 225–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, F. G. (1968). Parapolitical systems. In Swartz, M. J. (ed.), Local Level Politics, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 281–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, F. (1969). Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organisation of Culture Difference, George Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C. (1996). Emergency decisions, cultural-selection mechanics, and group selection. Current Anthropology 37(5): 763–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon, P. (1954). Tiv Farm and Settlement, H. M. Stationary Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon, P. (1963). Social Anthropology, Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, M. (1982). Decoration as ritual symbol: A theoretical proposal and an ethnographic study in southern Sudan. In Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 80–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfiel, E. M., and Fox, J.W. (eds.) (1994). Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, C. (1995). A unified middle-range theory of artifact design. In Carr, C., and Neitzel, J. E. (eds.), Style, Society, and Person: Archaeological and Ethnological Perspectives, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 171–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, C., and Neitzel, J. E. (1995). Future directions for material style studies. In Carr, C., and Neitzel, J. E. (eds.), Style, Society, and Person: Archaeological and Ethnological Perspectives, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 437–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon, N. A. (1975). Genealogy, solidarity, and relatedness: Limits to local group size and patterns of fissioning in an expanding population. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 19: 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. E. (1996). Comment on agency, ideology, and power in archaeological theory. Current Anthropology 37(1): 51–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. E., and Blake, M. (1994). The power of prestige: Competitive generosity and the emergence of rank societies in lowland Mesoamerica. In Brumfiel, E. M., and Fox, J.W. (eds.), Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. P. (1994). Self Consciousness: An Alternative Anthropology of Identity, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M. (1990). Experimenting with style in archaeology: Some historical and theoretical issues. In Conkey, M., and Hastorf, C. (eds.), The Uses of Style in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M., and Spector, J. D. (1984). Archaeology and the study of gender. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, C. L. (1991). Craft specialization: Issues in defining, documenting, and explaining the organization of production. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 3, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, L. (1999). That Complex Whole: Culture and the Evolution of Human Behavior, Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, N., Sterner, J., and Gavua, K. (1988). Why pots are decorated. Current Anthropology 29: 365–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R., and Krebs, J. R. (1977). Animal signals: Information or manipulation? In Krebs, J. R., and Davies, N. B. (eds.), Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 282–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, W. R. (1990). Interaction, imitation, and communication as expressed in style: The Ucayali experience. In Conkey, M., and Hastorf, C. (eds.), The Uses of Style in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 82–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, W. R., and Lathrap, D. W. (1979). The making and breaking of Shipibo-Conibo ceramics. In Kramer, C. (ed.), Ethnoarchaeology: Implications of Ethnography for Archaeology, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 102–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, W. R., and Moore, J. A. (1982). The measurement and meaning of stylistic diversity. Ñawpa Pacha 20: 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descola, P. (1996). The Spears of Twilight: Life and Death in the Amazon Jungle, The New Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietler, M., and Herbich, I. (1998). In Stark, M. (ed.), The Archaeology of Social Boundaries, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 232–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R., Knight, C., and Power, C. (eds.) (1999). The Evolution of Culture: An Interdisciplinary View, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1940). The Nuer, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, R. (1973). Symbols: Public and Private. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish, Vintage Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, M. H. (1970). Design structure and social interaction: Archaeological implications of an ethnographic analysis. American Antiquity 35(3): 332–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis, MacMillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godelier, M. (1986). Perspectives in Marxist Anthropology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, M.W. (1982). Breaking down ceramic variation: Testing models of White Mountain Redware design style development. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 305–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, M. W. (1994). Community boundaries in late prehistoric Puebloan society: Kalinga ethnoarchaeology as a model for the Southwestern production and exchange of pottery. In Wills, W. H., and Leonard, R. D. (eds.), The Ancient Southwestern Community: Models and Methods for the Study of Prehistoric Social Organization, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 149–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, M. A. (1977). Structure and Creativity: Family Style in Tarascan Greenware Painting, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago.

  • Hardin, M. A. (1983). The structure of Tarascan pottery painting. In Washburn, D. K. (ed.), Structure and Cognition in Art, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 8–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harner, M. J. (1973). The Jivaro: People of the Sacred Waterfalls, Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden City, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegmon, M. (1992). Archaeological research on style. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 517–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegmon, M. (1995). The Social Dynamics of Pottery Style in the Early Puebloan Southwest, Crow Canyon Archaeological Center, Cortez, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegmon, M. (1998). Technology, style, and social practices: Archaeological approaches. In Stark, M. T. (ed.), The Archaeology of Social Boundaries, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 264–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1982). Symbols in Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1984). The Present Past, Batsford Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1986). Reading the Past, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosler, D. (1996). Technical choices, social categories and meaning among the Andean potters of Las Animas. Journal of Material Culture 1(1): 63–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K., and Hegmon, M. (1991). The medium and the message: A survey of information conveyed by material culture in middle range societies. Paper presented at the 56th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans.

  • Karsten, R. (1935). The Head-Hunters ofWestern Amazonas: The Life and Culture of the Jibaro Indians of Eastern Ecuador and Peru, Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 7, Societas Scientarum Fennica, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelekna, P. (1981). Sex asymmetry in Jivaroan Achuara Society: A Cultural Mechanism Promoting Belligerence, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, P., and Orr, C. (1976). Ceramica Quichua de Sarayacu, Instituto Linguistico de Verano, Quito.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintigh, K. W. (1985). Social structure, the structure of style, and stylistic patterns in Cibola pottery. In Nelson, B. A. (ed.), Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, pp. 35–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lathrap, D. W. (1983). Recent Shipibo-Conibo ceramics and their implications for archaeological interpretation. In Washburn, D. K. (ed.), Structure and Cognition in Art, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechtman, H. (1977). Style in technology: Some early thoughts. In Lechtman, H., and Merrill, R. S. (eds.), Material Culture: Styles, Organization and Dynamics of Technology, West Publishing, St. Paul, MN, pp. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. (1977). Politics, sexual and non-sexual, in an egalitarian society. In Leacock, E., and Lee, R. (eds.), Politics and History in Band Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 37–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. A., and Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of Conflict, Ethnic Attitudes, and Group Behavior, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, W. K. (1990). Investigating style: An exploratory analysis of some Plains burials. In Conkey, M., and Hastorf, C. (eds.), The Uses of Style in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, B. (1991). The Language of the Inka Since the European Invasion, University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H. (1986). Space, Text, and Gender: An Anthropological Study of the Marakwet of Kenya, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J. D. (1979). Structural studies of art styles. In Cordwell, J. M. (ed.), The Visual Arts, The Hague, Mouton, pp. 139–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, S. B. (1974). Is female to male as nature is to culture? In Rosaldo, M. Z., and Lamphere, L. (eds.), Woman, Culture & Society, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 67–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, S. B. (1984). Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History 14: 126–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, J. Q. (1996). ThoughtfulWarriors: Status,Warriorship, and Alliance in the Ecuadorian Amazon, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara and University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, J. Q. (2000). Reciprocal altruism and warfare: A case from the Ecuadorian Amazon. In Cronk, L., Chagnon, N., and Irons, W. (eds.), Adaptation and Human Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp. 417–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, P. M. (1987). Pottery Analysis: A Sourcebook, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, P. G. (1980). Art and residence among the Shipibo Indians of Peru: A study in microacculturation. American Anthropologist 82: 42–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, M. Z. (1980). The use and abuse of anthropology: Reflections on feminism and cross-cultural understanding. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 5(3): 389–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, E. B. (1976). The Achuara Jivaro: Cultural Adaptation in the Upper Amazon, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Political Sciences, Columbia University.

  • Ross, J. B. (1984). Effects of contact on revenge hostilities among the Achuara Jivaro. In Ferguson, R. B. (ed.), Warfare, Culture, and Environment, Academic Press, New York, pp. 83–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. B. (1988). A Balance of Deaths: Revenge Feuding among the Achuara Jivaro of the Northwest Peruvian Amazon, Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University.

  • Royce, A. (1983). Ethnic Identity, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, J. R. (1985). Style and ethnicity in the Kalahari: A reply to Wiessner. American Antiquity 50: 154–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, J. R. (1986). Isochrestism and style: A clarification. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5: 266-277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, J. R. (1990). Style and ethnicity in archaeology: The case for isochrestism. In Conkey, M., and Hastorf, C. (eds.), The Uses of Style in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. D. (1961). The segmentary lineage: Instrument of predatory expansion. American Anthropologist 63: 322–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, R. F. (1977). Transactional politics: Factions and beyond. In Silverman, M., and Salisbury, R. F. (eds.), A House Divided? Anthropological Studies of Factionalism, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, R. F., and Silverman, M. (1977). An introduction: Factions and the dialectic. In Silverman, M., and Salisbury, R. F. (eds.), A House Divided? Anthropological Studies of Factionalism, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B. (1999). The Material Life of Human Beings: Artifacts, Behavior, and Communication, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skibo, J. M., and Schiffer, M. B. (1995). The clay cooking pot: An exploration of women's technology. In Skibo, J. M., Walker, W. H., and Nielsen, A. E. (eds.), Expanding Archaeology, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 80–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, M. (1977). Village council and factionalism: Definitional and contextual issues. In Silverman, M., and Salisbury, R. F. (eds.), A House Divided? Anthropological Studies of Factionalism, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 66–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, M. (ed.) (1998), The Archaeology of Social Boundaries, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterner, J. (1989). Who is signaling whom? Ceramic style, ethnicity and taphonomy among the Sirak Bulahay. Antiquity 63: 451–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, M. W. (1938). Historical and Ethnographical Material on the Jivaro Indians, Smithsonian Institution Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 117, United StatesGovernment Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, L. E. (1988). Icanchu's Drum: An Orientation to Meaning in South American Religions, MacMillan Publishing Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessman, G. (1930). Die Indianer Nordost-Perus: Grundlegende Forschungen Für Eine Systematische Kulturkunde, Cram, De Gruyter & Co., Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villacres, N., Pozo, M., Guacho, G., and Santi, B. (1988). Costumbres, Leyendas y Tradiciones del Pueblo Quichua de las Comunidades de Conambo y Morete-Cocha. Bachelor's Thesis, Instituto Normal Superior de Shell, Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, D. K. (ed.) (1983). Structure and Cognition in Art, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, D. K., and Crowe, D. W. (1988). Symmetries of Culture, University of Washington Press, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, S. C., and Romney, A. K. (1988). Systematic Data Collection, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, N. E. (1976). Sacha Runa, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, D. S., and Whitten, N. E. (1988). From Myth to Creation: Art from Amazonian Ecuador, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, D. K., and Whitten, N. E. (1993). The world of the Canelos Quichua: Culture, ceramics, and continuity. In Paymal, N., and Sosa, C. (eds.), Amazon Worlds, Sinchi Sacha, Quito, pp. 96–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiessner, P. (1983). Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity 48: 253–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiessner, P. (1984). Reconsidering the behavioral basis for style: A case study among the Kalahari San. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 3: 190–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiessner, P. (1989). Style and changing social relations between the individual and society. In Hodder, I. (ed.), The Meaning of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression, Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiessner, P. (1997). Seeking guidelines through an evolutionary approach: Style revisited among the !Kung San (Ju/'Hoanis) of the 1990s. In Barton, C. M., and Clark, G. A. (eds.), Rediscovering Darwin: Evolutionary Theory and Archaeological Explanation, Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association No. 7, pp. 157–176.

  • Wobst, H. M. (1977). Stylistic behavior and information exchange. In Cleland, C. E. (ed.), For the Director: Essays in Honor of James B. Griffin, Anthropological Papers of the Museum of Anthropology No. 61, Ann Arbor, pp. 317–344.

  • Wycoff, L. L. (1990). Designs and Factions: Politics, Religion, and Ceramics on the Hopi Third Mesa, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1991). Gender theory and the archaeological record: Why is there no archaeology of gender? In Gero, J. M., and Conkey, M. C., Engendering Archaeology: Women in Prehistory, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, pp. 31–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, J. A. (1983). La etnoarqueologia de una vivienda Achuar y sus implicaciones arqueologicas. Miscelánea Antropológica Ecuatoriana 3: 155–193.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Brenda J. Bowser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bowser, B.J. From Pottery to Politics: An Ethnoarchaeological Study of Political Factionalism, Ethnicity, and Domestic Pottery Style in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7, 219–248 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026510620824

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026510620824

Search

Navigation