Abstract
Ethnoarchaeological studies have longed served as a critical source of hypotheses, comparative data, and explanatory frameworks for archaeologists interested in describing and explaining ceramic production. In this paper, I lay out the central questions addressed by archaeologists studying craft production, discuss how ethnoarchaeology has contributed to our understanding of ancient production systems, and suggest avenues of further research that can benefit archaeological investigation of the organization of ceramic production.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES CITED
Arnold, D. (1985). Ceramic Theory and Cultural Process, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Arnold, D. (1993). Ecology and Ceramic Production in an Andean Community, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Arnold, D. E. (2000). Does the standardization of ceramic pastes really mean specialization? Journal of Archeological Method and Theory 7: pp333-375.
Arnold, P. (1991). Domestic Ceramic Production and Spatial Organization: A Mexican Case Study in Ethnoarchaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Arnold, P. J., III (1998). Ceramic ethnoarchaeology: Caught between “coming of age” and “showing its age”. Reviews in Anthropology 27: pp17-32.
Arnold, P. J., III (1999). On typologies, selection, and ethnoarchaeology in ceramic production studies. In Chilton, E. (ed.), Material Meanings: Critical Approaches to the Interpretation of Material Culture, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 103–117.
Ben-Amos, P. (1971). Social Change in the Organization of Wood Carving in Benin City, Nigeria. Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI.
Bishop, R. L., Rands, R. L., and Holley, G. R. (1982). Ceramic compositional analysis in archaeological perspective. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 5, Academic Press, New York, pp. 275–330.
Bowser, B. J. (1996). Local and regional exchange of ceramic resources in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Paper presented at the 95th annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco, California.
Bowser, B. J. (1998). From pottery to politics: An ethnoarchaeological model of political factionalism and women's domestic pottery in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Paper presented at the 63rd annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Seattle, Washington.
Bowser, B. J. (2000). From pottery to politics: An ethnoarchaeological case study of political factionalism, ethnicity, and domestic pottery style in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 219–248.
Brumfiel, E., and Earle, T. (eds.). (1987). Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Byrne, B. (1994). Access to subsistence resources and the sexual division of labor among potters. Cross-Cultural Research 28: 225–250.
Childe, V. G. (1950). The urban revolution. Town Planning Review 21(1): 3–17.
Clark, J. E. (1995). Craft specialization as an archaeological category. Research in Economic Anthropology 14: 267–294.
Clark, J. E. (1996). Craft production and practice. Ms. in the possession of the author.
Clark, J. E. (1997). Prismatic blademaking, craftsmanship, and production: An analysis of obsidian refuse from Ojo de Agua, Chiapas, Mexico. Ancient Mesoamerica 8: 137–159.
Clark, J. E., and Parry, W. (1990). Craft specialization and cultural complexity. Research in Economic Anthropology 12: 289–346.
Cook, S., and Binford, L. (1991). Obliging Need: Rural Petty Industry in Mexican Capitalism, University of Texas Press, Austin.
Costin, C. L. (1991). Craft specialization: Issues in defining, documenting, and explaining the organization of production. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 3, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 1–56.
Costin, C. L. (1996). Exploring the relationship between gender and craft in complex societies: Methodological and theoretical issues of gender attribution. In Wright, R. P. (ed.), Gender and Archaeology: Essays in Research and Practice, University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 111–142.
Costin, C. L. (1998a). Concepts of property and access to nonagricultural resources in the Inka empire. In Hunt, R., and Gilman, A. (eds.), Property in Economic Context. Monographs in Economic Anthropology, No. 14, University Press of America, Lanham, pp. 119–137.
Costin, C. L. (1998b). Introduction. In Costin, C. L., and Wright, R. (eds.), Craft and Social Identity, Archaeological Papers, No. 8, American Anthropological Association, Washington DC, pp. 3–18.
Costin, C. L. (in press). Craft production systems. In Price, T. D., and Feinman, G. (eds.), Archaeology at the Millenium, Plenum Press, New York.
Costin, C. and Hagstrum, M. (1995). Standardization, labor investment, skill, and the organization of ceramic production in late prehispanic Peru. American Antiquity 60: 619–639.
Costin, C. L., and Wright, R. P. (eds.). (1998). Craft and Social Identity. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association Number 8. Washington DC.
David, N., and Hennig, H. (1972). The ethnography of pottery: A Fulani case seen in archaeological perspective. Modules in Anthropology 21, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Deal, M. (1998). Pottery Ethnoarchaeology in the Central Maya Highlands. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
DeBoer, W. (1991). The decorative burden: Design, medium, and change. In Longacre, W. (ed.), Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 144–161.
Dobres, M.-A., and Hoffman, C. (1999). The Social Dynamics of Technology: Practice, Politics, and World Views. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC.
Donnan, C., and Clewlow, C. W. (1974). Ethnoarchaeology, UCLA Institute of Archaeology, Monograph 4.
Errington, S. (1998). The Death of Authentic Primitive Art and Other Tales of Progress, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Feinman, G. (1985). Changes in the organization of ceramic production in pre-Hispanic Oaxaca, Mexico. In Nelson, B. (ed.), Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL, pp. 195–224.
Gero, J. (1991). Genderlithics: Women's roles in stone tool production. In Gero, J., and Conkey, M. (eds.), Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 163–193.
Gosselain, O. P. (2000). Materializing identities: An African perspective. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 187–217.
Graburn, N. (ed.). (1976). Ethnic And Tourist Arts: Cultural Expressions From The Fourth World. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Hagstrum, M. B. (1989). Technological Continuity and Change: Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology in the Peruvian Andes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.
Hardin, M. A., and Mills, B. J. (2000). The social and historical context of short-term stylistic replacement: A Zuni case study. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 139–163.
Hodder, I. (1982). Symbols In Action: Ethnoarchaeological Studies Of Material Culture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hodder, I. (1991). The decoration of containers: An ethnographic and historical study. In Longacre, W. (ed.), Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 71–94.
Kalentzidou, O. (2000). Discontinuing traditions: Historically informed ethnoarchaeology in the study of Evros ceramics. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 165–186.
Kenoyer, M. K., Vidale, M., and Bahn, K. K. (1991). Contemporary stone beadmaking in Khambhat, India: Patterns of craft specialization and organization of production as reflected in the archaeological record. World Archaeology 23(1): 44–63.
Kleinberg, M. J. (1979). Kinship and Economic Growth: Pottery Production in a Japanese Village. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI.
Kramer, C. (1998). Pottery is Rajasthan. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
Kramer, C. (1991). Ceramics in two Indian cities. In Longacre, W. (ed.), Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 205–230.
Kramer, C. (1985). Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 14: 77–102.
Kramer, C. (1979). Introduction. In Ethnoarchaeology: Implications of Ethnography for Archaeology, Columbia University Press, New York.
Lechtman, H. (1984). Andean value systems and the development of prehistoric metallurgy. Technology and Culture 25(1): 1–36.
Lechtman, H. (1993). Technologies of power: The Andean case. In Henderson, J. S., and Netherly, P. J. (eds.), Configurations of Power: Holistic Anthropology in Theory and Practice, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp. 244–280.
Longacre, W. (1991). Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology. University of Arizona Press. Tucson.
Longacre, W. A., Xia, J., and Yang, T. (2000). I want to buy a black pot. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 273–293.
London, G. A. (1991). Standardization and variation in the work of craft specialists. In Longacre, W. (ed.), Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 182–204.
Mills, B. J. (1995). Gender and the reorganization of historic Zuni craft production: Implications for archaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Research 51: 149–172.
Mills, B. J. (in press). Gender, craft production, and inequality in the American Southwest. In Crown, P. L. (ed.), Sex Roles and Gender Hierarchies in the American Southwest, School of American Research.
Murdock, G., and Provost, C. (1973). Factors in the division of labor by sex: A cross-cultural analysis. Ethnology 12: 203–225.
Nash, J. (ed.). (1993). Crafts in theWorld Market: The Impact of Global Exchange on Middle American Artisans, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Nelson, B. A. (1985). Reconstructing ceramic vessels and their systemic contexts. In Nelson, B. A. (ed.), Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, pp. 310–329.
Nelson, B. A. (1991). Ceramic frequency and use-Life: A highland Mayan case in cross-cultural perspective, In Longacre, W. (ed.), Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology, Tucson University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 162–181.
Neupert, M. A. (2000). Clays of contention: An ethnoarchaeological study of factionalism and clay composition. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 249–272.
O'Brien, R. (1999). Who weaves and why? Weaving, loom complexity and trade. Cross-Cultural Research 33: 30–42.
Pool, C. (1992). Integrating ceramic production and distribution. In Bey, G. J., and Pool, C. A. (eds.), Ceramic Production and Distribution, An Integrated Approach, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 275–313.
Rice, P. (1981). Evolution of specialized pottery production: A trial model. Current Anthropology 22(3): 219–240.
Rice, P. (1991). Women and prehistoric pottery production. In Walde, D., and Willows, N. (eds.), The Archaeology of Gender, Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary, pp. 436–443.
Rice, P. (1996). Recent ceramic analysis 2: Composition, production, and theory. Journal of Archaeological Research 4: 165–202.
Santley, R. S., Arnold, P., and Pool, C. (1989). The ceramic production system at Matacapan. Journal of Field Archaeology 16: 107–132.
Schiffer, M. B. (1987). Methodological issues in ethnoarchaeology. In Gould, R. A. (ed.), Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 229–248.
Schwartz, D. (1978). Forward. In Gould, R. A. (ed.), Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. vii, viii.
Senior, L. M. (in press). A model of gender and craft innovation. In Hurcombe, L., and Donald, M. (ed.), Gender and Material Culture: Archaeological Perspectives, Macmillan, London.
Sinopoli, C. (1988). The organization of craft production at Vijayanagara, South India. American Anthropologist 90(3): 580–597.
Skibo, J. M. and Schiffer, M. B. (1995). The clay cooking pot: An exploration of women's technology. In Skibo, J. M., Walker, W. H., and Nielsen, A. E. (eds.), Expanding Archaeology, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 80–91.
Stark, B. (1985). Archaeological identification of pottery production locations: Ethnoarchaeological and archaeological data in Mesoamerica. In Nelson, B. (ed.), Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, pp. 158–194.
Stark, M. T. (1991). Ceramic production and community specialization:A Kalinga ethnoarchaeological study. World Archaeology 23(1): 64–78.
Stark, M. T. (1995). Economic intensification and ceramic specialization in the Philippines: A view from Kalinga. Research in Economic Anthropology 16: 179–226.
Stark, M. T. (1999). The Archaeology of Social Boundaries. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC.
Stark, M. T., Bishop, R. L., and Miksa, E. (2000). Ceramic technology and social boundaries: Cultural practices in Kalinga clay selection and use. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 295–331.
Tice, K. E. (1995). Kuna Crafts, Gender, and the Global Economy, University of Texas Press, Austin.
Van der Leeuw, S. (1991). Variation, variability, and explanation in pottery studies. In Longacre, W. (ed.), Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 11–39.
Varien, M. D., and Mills, B. J. (1997). Accumulations research: Problems and prospects for estimating site occupation span. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 4: 141–191.
Wright, R. (1991). Women's labor and pottery production in prehistory. In Gero, J., and Conkey, M. (eds.), Engendering Archaeology, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 194–223.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Costin, C.L. The Use of Ethnoarchaeology for the Archaeological Study of Ceramic Production. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7, 377–403 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026523023550
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026523023550