Skip to main content
Log in

On the Ownership of Text

  • Published:
Computers and the Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper explores the notions of text ownership and its partial inverse, plagiarism, and asks how close or different they are from a procedural point of view that might seek to establish either of these properties. The emphasis is on procedures rather than on the conventional subject division of authorship studies, plagiarism detection etc. We use, as a particular example, our research on the notion of computational detection of text rewriting, in the benign sense of a standard journalist's adaptation of the Press Association newsfeed. The conclusion is that, whatever may be the case in copyright law, procedural detection and establishment of the ownership is a complex and vexed matter. Behind the paper is an unspoken appeal to return to an earlier historical phase, one where texts were normally rewritten and rewritten again and the ownership of text by an individual was a less clear matter than in historically recent times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bellew R. (1989) Adaptive Information Retrieval: Using a Connectionist Representation To Retrieve and Learn about Documents. In Proceedings of SIGIR.

  • Biber D., Johansson S., Leech G., Conrad S., Finegan E. (1999) The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman Group, Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church K. (2000) Why the likelihood of a second Noriega is not 1/p. In Proceedings ECAI2000, Berlin.

  • Clough P., Gaizauskas R., Scott S., Wilks Y. (2002) MeTeR: Measuring Text Reuse. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics Conference (ACL02), Philadelphia, PA.

  • Dunning T. (1998) Finding Structure in Text, Genome and Other Symbolic Sequences. Sheffield PhD thesis.

  • Kilgarriff A. (1997) Using Word Frequency Lists to Measure Corpus Homogeneity and Similarity between Corpora. In Proceedings Fifth ACL Workshop on Very Large Corpora, Beijing and Hong Kong, August 1997.

  • Shivakumar N., Garcia-Molina H. (1995) SCAM: A Copy Detection Mechanism for Digital Documents. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, Austin, TX.

  • Wise M. (1993) String Similarity via Greedy String Tiling Running Karp-Rabin Matching [ftp://ftp.cs.su.oz.au/michaelw/doc/RKRGST].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilks, Y. On the Ownership of Text. Computers and the Humanities 38, 115–127 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CHUM.0000031184.28781.47

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CHUM.0000031184.28781.47

Navigation